Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE VERDICT IS IN! Dog owners guilty on all counts...
Yahoo! News ^ | 03-21-02 | AP

Posted on 03/21/2002 1:18:25 PM PST by CPI News

A woman whose two huge dogs mauled a neighbor to death in a San Francisco apartment building was convicted of murder and manslaughter Thursday. Her husband was found guilty of manslaughter.

Marjorie Knoller, 46, could get 15 years to life in prison for the second-degree murder conviction in the death of 33-year-old Diane Whipple. She looked stricken upon hearing the verdict, taking several deep breaths.

Her 60-year-old husband, Robert Noel, showed no reaction. Both were also convicted of involuntary manslaughter and having a mischievous dog that killed someone.

The sentencing date was not immediately announced.

Murder charges are rare in dog mauling cases, but prosecutors said the husband-and-wife lawyers knew their two powerful Presa Canarios were "time bombs." The prosecution brought in more than 30 witnesses who said they had been terrorized by the dogs, Bane and Hera.

The defense contended that Knoller and Noel could not have known their animals would kill, and that Knoller tried to save Whipple by throwing herself between her neighbor and the enraged Bane. They also disputed the witnesses' accounts of being menaced by the dogs.

The jury reached decisions on four of the counts Wednesday afternoon, but the verdicts were sealed until the final charge was settled Thursday. In all, the jury deliberated for about 111/2 hours.

The trial was moved to Los Angeles because of concern that overwhelming publicity would prevent a fair trial in San Francisco. The attack so traumatized the pet-friendly city that police tightened enforcement of leash laws and city officials briefly considered a muzzle law.

The case made legal history even before the trial began when Whipple's lesbian partner, Sharon Smith, claimed the same right as a spouse to sue for damages. The Legislature enacted a law to allow such lawsuits by gay partners.

Pretrial hearings were explosive, with the prosecutor alleging at one point that Knoller and Noel practiced bestiality with their dogs. Evidence relating to that claim was barred from the trial by the judge along with most evidence about the Aryan Brotherhood.

The trial itself was grim: The jurors were shown 77 bloody photos of Whipple's wounds, many of them blown up to wall size on a movie screen. The prosecutors said the 110-pound college lacrosse coach had been bitten everywhere except the top of her head and the soles of her feet.

Experts said the 120-pound Bane delivered the fatal wounds. They could not say for certain whether the other dog took part in the attack. Both dogs were later destroyed.

Knoller testified for three days, crying, shouting and insisting she never suspected her beloved dogs could be killers.

"I saw a pet who had been loving, docile, friendly, good toward people, turn into a crazed, wild animal," she sobbed, referring to Bane.

Her lawyer, Nedra Ruiz, contributed to the courtroom drama by crawling on the floor, kicking the jury box and crying during her opening statement. In closing arguments, she accused prosecutors of trying to "curry favor with the homosexual and gay folks."

Noel did not testify and contended through his lawyer that he had no warning the dogs would kill. But his letters to the couple's adopted son were read to the jury. Two weeks before the attack, Noel wrote about an incident in which Whipple was frightened by the dogs as she entered the building's elevator.

In the letter, Noel referred to Whipple as a "timorous little mousy blond."

After the attack, he wrote another letter bemoaning the death of Bane and vowing to fight for the life of Hera.

"Neighbors be damned," he wrote. "If they don't like living in the building with her, they can move."

The second-degree murder charge against Knoller was unusual, since there had never been a conviction on that charge in a dog mauling case in California. In fact, murder appears to have been proven only twice in U.S. dog mauling cases.

Sabine Davidson of Milford, Kan., was convicted of second-degree murder in 1997 after her three Rottweilers killed an 11-year-old boy and was sentenced to 11 years in prison. Jeffrey Mann of Cleveland was sentenced to 15 years to life in 1993 after he knocked his wife unconscious and ordered his pit bull to attack her.

Two years ago, James Chiavetta of San Bernardino County was charged with second-degree murder but convicted instead of involuntary manslaughter after his pit bull mix killed a 10-year-old boy. He had left the dog unleashed in the yard with an open gate while he napped.

He was sentenced to four years in prison.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: counts; dog; guilty; jury; knoller; mauling; noel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-185 next last

1 posted on 03/21/2002 1:18:25 PM PST by CPI News
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CPI News
A face that only a dog could love.
2 posted on 03/21/2002 1:21:41 PM PST by Uncle Sausage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sausage
I thought that was the dog. Yikes!
3 posted on 03/21/2002 1:22:17 PM PST by Charles Martel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel
YEEHAW!
4 posted on 03/21/2002 1:23:36 PM PST by hawaiian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CPI News
I guess I don't get how she could be convicted on both manslaughter and murder for one event. Isn't manslaughter a "lesser included charge" usually? - Not a separate charge? Anyone clear this up for me?
5 posted on 03/21/2002 1:24:36 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CPI News
Wow, its been tough for the bad guys lately.

First yates and now this, are the OJ Clinton days through?

6 posted on 03/21/2002 1:25:57 PM PST by liberalism=failure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CPI News
Is it just me or does she look quite a bit older than 46?
7 posted on 03/21/2002 1:26:22 PM PST by inflorida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CPI News
Good. When she blamed the victim for being at fault when the dog killed her, I almost lost it. What an evil person! Good riddance -- no parole, ever.
8 posted on 03/21/2002 1:26:42 PM PST by swampfox98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: inflorida
No, it's not just you. Could they have meant 56?
10 posted on 03/21/2002 1:32:31 PM PST by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: swampfox98
"...she blamed the victim ..."

Could the pendulum be swinging slowly back in the right direction? Or was this a case of ugly defendant/ugly lawyer and ugly dog? If the defendant and her attorney had looked Meg Ryan, do you think the verdict would have come out the same? Hmmmmm...

11 posted on 03/21/2002 1:33:00 PM PST by steenkeenbadges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: swampfox98
"...she blamed the victim ..."

Could the pendulum be swinging slowly back in the right direction? Or was this a case of ugly defendant/ugly lawyer and ugly dog? If the defendant and her attorney had looked Meg Ryan, do you think the verdict would have come out the same? Hmmmmm...

12 posted on 03/21/2002 1:33:36 PM PST by steenkeenbadges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
That's what I'm wondering...maybe it was a typo.
13 posted on 03/21/2002 1:34:15 PM PST by inflorida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
I don't know either. I think manslaughter is without malice nor premeditation and murder is with malice and premeditation.
I yelled at a lawyer leaving the building here now, and she shouted back "Get me a copy of the specific counts, the charges....."
Isn't that just like a lawyer? Ask her a question and she tasks me to go get me more information!
I have no idea what the counts are. I was downloading boring data on cattle info.
T
14 posted on 03/21/2002 1:34:57 PM PST by AzJP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel
I think she looks like a bull dog.....
15 posted on 03/21/2002 1:36:20 PM PST by CPI News
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CPI News
Dog owners are liberal jokesters

Asked about his seemingly contradictory client list, Noel, who considers himself liberal, joked:

"As an attorney, I've come in contact with all sorts of people. I'd represent a Republican."

16 posted on 03/21/2002 1:37:23 PM PST by monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
The question you are asking about "lesser included" is being asked by others also. I'm not a lawyer, but it seems that it has to be one charge or the other. My guess is that the D.A decided to file both, hoping for a conviction on the manslaughter charge at least, but rolling the dice and hoping for a conviction on the more serious charge of 2nd degree murder. BOOMBA! The jury came back with GUILTY on both! I would think at some point that the manslaughter will be dropped, or at sentencing it will be run "concurrent" with the sentence for the 2nd degree murder.
17 posted on 03/21/2002 1:38:00 PM PST by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CPI News
This verdict is total Barbra Streisand. And so is the charge.

"Murder" involves intent. Did she intend for her dogs to kill the woman? Of course not. Involuntary manslaughter should have been the charge. And she's guilty of that.

How her husband got convicted when he wasn't even there beats the heck outta me.

Oh, wait! This was California, right? Silly me. It makes perfect sense there.

18 posted on 03/21/2002 1:38:07 PM PST by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inflorida
Is it just me or does she look quite a bit older than 46?

I don't know...but having sex with a large killer type dog might age you a bit.....JMHO.

FMCDH!

19 posted on 03/21/2002 1:38:54 PM PST by nothingnew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: steenkeenbadges
If the defendant and her attorney had looked Meg Ryan, do you think the verdict would have come out the same? Hmmmmm

Had she looked like O.J. she'd have gone free, and the prosecuting attorney would have been jailed.

20 posted on 03/21/2002 1:39:57 PM PST by swampfox98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-185 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson