Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NUCLEAR WAR LOOMS IN SOUTH ASIA
Wednesday on the Web ^ | December 30, 2001 | Eric Margolis

Posted on 01/02/2002 9:51:11 PM PST by L,TOWM

For the first time since the October, 1962 Cuban missile crisis, two nuclear-armed powers, India and Pakistan, are in a direct military confrontation that could lead to a massive conventional war - and even to full-scale nuclear conflict. The armed forces of both old foes are on high alert and deploying to forward positions. India and Pakistan said last week their nuclear-armed missiles were ready to strike.

When `War at the Top of the World,' my book on Afghanistan and the Kashmir conflict first came out in 1999 (2000 in the USA, UK, and India), people asked, `who cares about that region?' I sought to explain, usually in vain, that this little-known, but highly strategic, part of the globe was about to erupt. A nuclear war between India and Pakistan, according to CIA studies, would kill 2 million people immediately, and injure 100 million. Equally apocalyptic, a nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan, and attacks on one another's nuclear power reactors, would send a cloud of radioactive dust around the planet.

India and Pakistan have already fought three wars over Kashmir. For the past twelve years, a score of Kashmiri Muslim insurgent groups have waged a fierce guerilla war against some 600,000 Indian soldiers and paramilitary troops in Indian Kashmir. India calls the Muslim insurgents `Pakistani-supported terrorists,' a position lately adopted by the United States. Pakistan calls them legitimate `freedom fighters' battling for the independence of Kashmir. India's has long rejected UN demands for a plebiscite to determine Kashmir's future.

The Kashmir insurgency has been an extremely dirty war. Some 50,000 have died, mainly civilians. Indian forces have resorted to brutal reprisals, arson, torture, murder of suspects, and gang rape of Muslim women. Kashmir insurgents have slaughtered Hindus, causing 250,000 to flee the Jammu region, and assassinated many state officials. Indian forces disguised as Kashmiri mujihadin have even attacked Sikhs in an effort to turn them against Muslims.

India has long threatened to attack Pakistan, which it accuses of arming and supporting the Kashmiri mujihadin. In fact, Pakistani intelligence, ISI, has quietly backed some - but not all - of the militant groups, as well as Sikh separatists and Christian insurgents in India's eastern hill states. India, in turn, stirs up sectarian violence inside Pakistan.

For India, the last straw came just before Christmas, when as yet unidentified militants attacked India's parliament building in New Delhi. This assault followed attacks against Delhi's trademark Red Fort and against the Kashmir parliament in Srinagar. India accused two new Pakistan-based Kashmiri insurgent groups - Lashkar-e-Toyiba and Jash-e-Mohammed - of staging the attacks with Pakistani backing. Interestingly, according to my information, neither of these extreme groups are run by Pakistani intelligence. But Pakistan was plunged into confrontation with an outraged India.

The attack on parliament in Delhi was an intolerable outrage. India's cautious prime minister, Atal Vajpayee, is under intense pressure to strike Pakistan - or at least Kashmiri insurgent bases in the Pakistani portion of divided Kashmir. Hindu fundamentalists, led by Home Minister L.K.Advani and Defense Minister George Fernandes, are beating the war drums. Even India's usually conservative generals are itching to `teach those bloody Paks a lesson.'

Pakistan is issuing its own threats and massing troops. The confrontation with India is a boon for Pakistan's military strongman, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, diverting public anger over Pakistan's recent debacle in Afghanistan and its unpopular new role as an American base. Unfortunately for Pakistan, Musharraf retired or sidelined the army's best generals under American pressure just before the confrontation with India.

India is massing troops, armor, and aircraft to forward attack positions along its 1,000-mile border with Pakistan. India's three powerful armor-heavy `strike corps' are poised to sever Pakistan's vulnerable waist in the Bahawalpur-Rahimyar Khan sectors. India's increasingly potent navy is ready to blockade Karachi, Pakistan's main port and entry point for oil. India's 1.2-million man armed forces, with 3,400 tanks and 738 combat aircraft, outnumber and outgun Pakistan's 620,000 troops, 2,300 tanks and 353 warplanes. India's arsenal is mostly modern Russian equipment, while Pakistan's is obsolescent. Equally important, Pakistan's limited industrial base allows only a short war, while India's much larger economy can sustain a long conflict.

The US is leading frantic diplomatic efforts to prevent war. But passion are running very high. The most likely war scenario: Indian commando and air attacks on insurgent bases in Pakistani Kashmir which could escalate to full-scale war. Pakistan probably cannot halt a massive Indian invasion without using tactical nuclear weapons. This, in turn, could trigger nuclear strikes against military and civilian targets. Hopefully, both nations will pull back from the brink, but a false report, or another militant raid, could set off a huge, devastating war with unimaginable consequences.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Interesting take. Somewhat alarmist for my tastes, but considering that these two countries have as bloody a history as the Mid-East players, and now have nukes, a situation well worth watching.

Also a cogent analysis. Pakistan would (most likely) not enjoy the trip to the woodshed India could put on them if it came to full scale hostillities. India would have to pull some punches to make sure that mushroom season does'nt come to their sub-continent.

1 posted on 01/02/2002 9:51:11 PM PST by L,TOWM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: L,TOWM
bttt and my apologies for a post and run, but it is my bedtime. Check in tomorrow; G'night all...
2 posted on 01/02/2002 9:53:26 PM PST by L,TOWM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L,TOWM
It's a very good analysis, especially the part that notes that Vajpayee is cautious. He is very cautious and that combined with US pressure in my mind is one of the factors that will help stop a war.
3 posted on 01/02/2002 10:05:35 PM PST by ChicagoRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L,TOWM
I was under the impression that tensions were ratcheting down in the Kashmir region. Are these countries actually backing down from conflict, or is this the proverbial "calm before the storm?"
4 posted on 01/02/2002 10:08:31 PM PST by Billy_bob_bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob
India would be all over Pakistan like hair on an ape if it wasn't for China threatening on its border. This is a case of three nations tied together with their own ambitions and afraid to move against the other two. A three-way knife fight never happens. A lot of bluster and threats but about all.
5 posted on 01/02/2002 10:25:37 PM PST by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: L,TOWM
I have been reading Eric Margolis' column for several years, since he often has something intelligent and interesting to say about areas of the world that I know a fair amount about (unlike most other "geopolitical" columnists, who tend to be liberal morons rehashing the Party line).

If Mr Margolis, with his miltary and journalistic experience, believes that another India-Pakistan War is probably on the way, then I tend to believe him.

This will be the real test for the Colin Powell State Department.

6 posted on 01/02/2002 10:31:49 PM PST by RANGERAIRBORNE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meenie
Did anyone see "The good, the bad and the ugly"? A three way fight quickly becomes a two way fight if one of the players is a lot weaker than the others, or caught in a disadvantaged position.
7 posted on 01/02/2002 10:34:06 PM PST by Billy_bob_bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: meenie
"A three-way knife fight never happens"

LOL! Actually, though, I have seen a couple of three-way knife fights, as well as a memorable five-way!! (Drugs and alcohol may have been involved...)

But you are correct that China is critical in restraining India- if it were only India and Pakistan, there would now be a very large depression where Pakistan used to be.

9 posted on 01/02/2002 10:36:29 PM PST by RANGERAIRBORNE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: L,TOWM
What if, just for grins, we (by which I mean the US,) just sat this one out? In effect, if the Indians and the Pakistanis start lobbing nukes at each other, the US gets all of our Military out of the area, leaves all the tourists seeking enlightenment behind, expresses outrage and horror, strongly condemns both sides, and lets two enemies of Western culture obliterate each other? If either side shoots at us, we throw a few cruise missles, ala clinton, at the offending side, but otherwise NOT TAKE SIDES! What If...?
10 posted on 01/02/2002 10:36:55 PM PST by jonascord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meenie
Islam is out of control...they may curb this stand-off..but Sons of Ishmael will put a match to it again and again. Same with the mid-east..Even if Israel gives the "Gargoyle of Gaza" his state...nothing changes...the unimaginable will occur...it's a terminal path...only way to stop it is to detonate Neutronics in the deserts of Saudi Arabia... Syria..Iran...and Egypt....radiation will dissapait...loss of life will be low..but with that action..a one time deal..Democracy...no more Islamic /religious state...or bye..bye. Its radicall..would scare the world half to death..but that factor would work in everyones favour... alas..I am dreaming..for the resolve is not there..and the conflagration referenced in the Bible and other prophetic writings will undoubtadly happen.. I have this bad feeling..Sept 11th was a warning from the Almighty to get off our assess and deal with this..for the planets sake...there is a time limit on dealing with Islam.. failure to reign them in..will cost the planet millions later. Some think I have discernment..some tell me to adjust the tin foil on my head!
11 posted on 01/02/2002 10:43:46 PM PST by Light Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Light Speed
Avoiding war with the hell-bent mohammedan animals is nothing more than dumping it on the next generations. What an evil and cowardly thing to do to our children. We must take up the burden and wipe out, or at least decimate the enemy for the sake of human civilization.
12 posted on 01/02/2002 11:17:42 PM PST by Thorondir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob
Did anyone see "The good, the bad and the ugly"? A three way fight quickly becomes a two way fight if one of the players is a lot weaker than the others, or caught in a disadvantaged position.

Or who has an unloaded gun.

13 posted on 01/02/2002 11:46:45 PM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob; Tuco Bad
Did anyone see "The good, the bad and the ugly"? A three way fight quickly becomes a two way fight if one of the players is a lot weaker than the others, or caught in a disadvantaged position.

Speaking of which, whatever happened to Tuco Bad?

14 posted on 01/02/2002 11:47:21 PM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Speaking of which, whatever happened to Tuco Bad?

You mean Eli Wallach? As far as I know, he is still alive and kicking, though Lee Van Cleef died some years ago.

15 posted on 01/02/2002 11:50:13 PM PST by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RANGERAIRBORNE
But you are correct that China is critical in restraining India- if it were only India and Pakistan...

The Chinese are not stupid. I'd bet that they're sitting back, rubbing their hands over a hot kettle of tea, just waiting to see the unfolding events between Inja and Paki.

China will pick its teeth on the survivors' bones.

W, C, P, R, R better be on mental full alert for a long time.

16 posted on 01/02/2002 11:50:31 PM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mark17; Tuco Bad
You mean Eli Wallach? As far as I know, he is still alive and kicking, though Lee Van Cleef died some years ago.

NO, I mean Tuco Bad. He promised to leave Free Republic if Bush lost California but won the election. He's still here though.

17 posted on 01/03/2002 12:01:13 AM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mark17; Tuco-bad
You mean Eli Wallach? As far as I know, he is still alive and kicking, though Lee Van Cleef died some years ago.

NO, I mean Tuco Bad. He promised to leave Free Republic if Bush lost California but won the election. He's still here though.

18 posted on 01/03/2002 12:01:40 AM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Hark Hark!

Do I hear a ping?

19 posted on 01/03/2002 5:59:12 AM PST by Tuco-bad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
NO, I mean Tuco Bad. He promised to leave Free Republic if Bush lost California but won the election. He's still here though.

Let's be more accurate here!

I promised not to post (though I sin once in a while), but I still lurk.

20 posted on 01/03/2002 6:01:03 AM PST by Tuco-bad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson