Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OPEC to slash output in November
AFP ^ | October 27, 2001 | AFP

Posted on 10/27/2001 12:18:17 PM PDT by relee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Too bad, I was just getting used to cheaper gas prices.
1 posted on 10/27/2001 12:18:17 PM PDT by relee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: relee
Can anyone spell ANWR?
2 posted on 10/27/2001 12:20:29 PM PDT by facedown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: relee
I was wondering when they'd drive prices up!
3 posted on 10/27/2001 12:26:45 PM PDT by ET(end tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: facedown
Can anyone spell ANWR?

ANWR is a four letter word to Tom Daschle.

4 posted on 10/27/2001 12:30:18 PM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: relee
I'd like to suggest that we try and put ourselves on self imposed gas rations.

Some of the Islamic nations have called for boycotts of American products. I think its time we did the same, and that goes for oil, too.

Be as economic as you can with your gas usage. It's time they found out that we CAN survive without them. We CAN find other ways of heating homes..wood burning stoves and fireplaces, steam heat, solar.... we CAN cut back on needless driving.... I'm sure there are other ways but these will help for starters.

Each time you choose to not drive, consider that you are preventing them from making a dollar. It will add up.

5 posted on 10/27/2001 12:37:23 PM PDT by ET(end tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ET(end tyranny)
Self-imposed gas rations sounds too much like the Carter administration.

VP Cheney revealed the mindset of this administration when he derided conservation measures a few months ago.

If you are an oilman, you want people to use oil—period.

This mentality is not going to change at the top, no matter what. Grassroots movements might make a fleeting impact in terms of reducing consumption, but this is not the game plan of those in charge.

The plan is to subdue Central Asia and make it safe for investment of the majors and be on standby to seize the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia at a moment's notice if the KSA should fall.

I just hope our military is up to the tasks being assigned it. It is a tall order to stabilize a petroleum empire and keep it that way.

6 posted on 10/27/2001 12:43:39 PM PDT by longleaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: longleaf
Self-imposed gas rations sounds too much like the Carter administration.

I remember the rations of the Carter administration, and have no problem with it.

VP Cheney revealed the mindset of this administration when he derided conservation measures a few months ago. If you are an oilman, you want people to use oil—period.

Yeah I know.... made me chuckle when he said it! Gee, I wonder why he wants to promote buying over priced oil????? Could it be that someone he knows might have a vested interest in oil??????

This administration has tried to cutback the amount of funds the terrorists have by freezing their assets. Bring them to their knees via lack of funds. So, why is this theory not good for OPEC????

7 posted on 10/27/2001 12:51:23 PM PDT by ET(end tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ET(end tyranny)
OK now is the time to STOP these b*st*Rds and developed alternate sources. Do we like being gouged by these yahoos? Our goal should be to make Saudi Arabia's biggest and only export Cat Litter.
8 posted on 10/27/2001 12:56:14 PM PDT by L`enn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ET(end tyranny)
I'd like to suggest that we try and put ourselves on self imposed gas rations.

Own a van or SUV? Park it unless you're doing something which requires it. Get a dodge neon or a motorcycle for all the bombing around with just yhou in the vehicle.

9 posted on 10/27/2001 1:11:27 PM PDT by medved
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: relee
So what? This has been a fact of life since the seventies. If you don't like it, cut out your driving. Only liberals whine about high gas prices. Any knowledgeable person knows that cartels price increases cannot be sustained, simply because it is anathema to what they want: HI OUTPUT, HI PRICES. The market ALWAYS will overrule any cartel actions in the longer run. Cartel pricing is a pyrrhic victory.
10 posted on 10/27/2001 1:20:49 PM PDT by DebtsPaid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L`enn
Our goal should be to make Saudi Arabia's biggest and only export Cat Litter.

After making my last post I wondered, 'When is trading with the enemy NOT trading with the enemy?' When you want something they have. Could this be why we haven't or WON'T declare war on some of these nations? Because then if we bought their oil we'd be technically trading with the enemy? Granted only 'some' of the people from these nations have declared war on the US, but what does that tell you when the host nation doesn't DO anything about these 'people'?? That they quietly sanction the idea?

11 posted on 10/27/2001 1:23:54 PM PDT by ET(end tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dane
ANWR is a four letter word to Tom Daschle.

Selfsufficiency is a four letter word to Tom Daschole.
12 posted on 10/27/2001 1:23:55 PM PDT by facedown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DebtsPaid
HI OUTPUT, HI PRICES

And when they 'cutback' output???? Higher prices still! LOL

13 posted on 10/27/2001 1:25:31 PM PDT by ET(end tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: relee
Too bad, I was just getting used to cheaper gas prices.

Yeah, unleaded regular was as low as 97.9 cents at a few stations around here yesterday. Georgia has a low state tax on gasoline.

14 posted on 10/27/2001 1:29:01 PM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: facedown
Can anyone spell ANWR?

Yes... Drillnowdammit.

15 posted on 10/27/2001 1:32:59 PM PDT by oust the louse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: relee
It's their oil, they can do what they want. Of course, it will be seen as a hostile act to the American people who are already looking askance at the ME.
17 posted on 10/27/2001 1:52:30 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abwehr
Spot on!
18 posted on 10/27/2001 1:53:55 PM PDT by facedown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
It's their oil, they can do what they want.

If this war escalates it could all soon be OUR oil.

19 posted on 10/27/2001 2:02:18 PM PDT by RickyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: relee
Anyone who is opposed to drilling in ANWR or anywhere else there is oil in the USA is not only a terrorist supporter, but a terrorist themselves. Remember, no distinction is made between the terrorist and those who harbor them.
20 posted on 10/27/2001 2:06:51 PM PDT by GuillermoX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson