Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OPEC to slash output in November
AFP ^ | October 27, 2001 | AFP

Posted on 10/27/2001 12:18:17 PM PDT by relee

Saudi: OPEC to slash output in November

Global oil supply was excessive, according to Saudi oil minister

October 27, 2001, 01:19 PM
ABU DHABI (AFP)

- The world's top oil producer Saudi Arabia and two other Gulf nations announced Saturday that OPEC will shortly reduce production in order to push prices up.
Non-OPEC Oman said there was a need to reduce "current (global) production" by at least one million barrels a day in order to boost the price of a barrel to 25 dollars from current 19 to 20 dollar level.

"We (OPEC) have already reduced our production three times. I cannot see what prevents us from doing it again in order to preserve the price band" of 22 to 28 dollars per barrel, Saudi Oil Minister Ali Nuaimi said.

"OPEC will take all necessary measures to maintain the band," he added, at the end of a meeting with his counterparts Obeid Al-Nassiri from fellow OPEC member UAE, and Mohammad bin Hamad Al-Romhi of independent producer Oman.

Nuaimi said global oil supply was excessive and, asked if this meant the oil cartel was going to reduce production or, instead, decide to tighten members' compliance with their quotas, he replied "All of the above".

"There is an agreement in principle to change the production ceiling," added United Arab Emirates Oil Minister Obeid al-Nasseri at a press conference.

Romhi said a "one million bpd (cut) would be a good start, from current production." The Middle East Economic Survey (MEES) reported Saturday that a proposal to cut output by 750,000 to one million bpd will be on the agenda of the November 14 ministerial meeting of OPEC.

A joint statement issued after the Abu Dhabi meeting set the stage for broad agreement.

"The ministers have agreed to intensify their contacts and to continue their consultations with all parties concerned to ensure their support and cooperation in order to take the proper measures to balance the global oil market and stabilize prices, including measures to reduce excess crude supply from world oil markets," it said.

"The Sultanate of Oman has expressed its readiness to cut production and to cooperate with the rest of the producing countries from OPEC and non-OPEC in order to maintain the price band target," the statement said.

"The ministers noted with great concern the continued deterioration in crude oil prices to levels unseen since two years, caused by the most recent downward revision in world demand for the current year as well as next year and the excess supply and growing commercial stocks as compared to last year." Asked if he agreed that the excess volume was in the range of 700,000 to one million bpd, Nuaimi said the experts meeting on October 29 at the OPEC headquarters in Vienna "will hopefully distil that number and advise were it should be." The conclusions of the experts' meeting is supposed to weigh heavily on the decision to be taken by OPEC at the crucial ministerial conference on November 14.

Nuaimi warned that unless action is taken, the oil producers would find themselves in a situation similar to 1997, when a barrel of crude touched seven dollars.

Hemi hoped that agreements could be reached with the independent producers, such as Russia and Mexico, before the 11-member organisation's ministerial meeting.

Venezuela and Iraq have led calls for a snap reduction in OPEC output by one million bpd.

However OPEC has faced a dilemma in how to respond to the market slump.

Usually it would simply cut production to prop up prices but OPEC has been wary of sparking a political storm by trying to force prices higher at a time when the world`s major industrialized economies are heading into recession in the aftermath of the September 11 terror attacks on the United States.

The cartel has not triggered an automatic cut of 500,000 bpd foreseen by a price-band mechanism, even though its own basket price has remained under the price-band's floor for four weeks.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Too bad, I was just getting used to cheaper gas prices.
1 posted on 10/27/2001 12:18:17 PM PDT by relee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: relee
Can anyone spell ANWR?
2 posted on 10/27/2001 12:20:29 PM PDT by facedown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: relee
I was wondering when they'd drive prices up!
3 posted on 10/27/2001 12:26:45 PM PDT by ET(end tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: facedown
Can anyone spell ANWR?

ANWR is a four letter word to Tom Daschle.

4 posted on 10/27/2001 12:30:18 PM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: relee
I'd like to suggest that we try and put ourselves on self imposed gas rations.

Some of the Islamic nations have called for boycotts of American products. I think its time we did the same, and that goes for oil, too.

Be as economic as you can with your gas usage. It's time they found out that we CAN survive without them. We CAN find other ways of heating homes..wood burning stoves and fireplaces, steam heat, solar.... we CAN cut back on needless driving.... I'm sure there are other ways but these will help for starters.

Each time you choose to not drive, consider that you are preventing them from making a dollar. It will add up.

5 posted on 10/27/2001 12:37:23 PM PDT by ET(end tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ET(end tyranny)
Self-imposed gas rations sounds too much like the Carter administration.

VP Cheney revealed the mindset of this administration when he derided conservation measures a few months ago.

If you are an oilman, you want people to use oil—period.

This mentality is not going to change at the top, no matter what. Grassroots movements might make a fleeting impact in terms of reducing consumption, but this is not the game plan of those in charge.

The plan is to subdue Central Asia and make it safe for investment of the majors and be on standby to seize the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia at a moment's notice if the KSA should fall.

I just hope our military is up to the tasks being assigned it. It is a tall order to stabilize a petroleum empire and keep it that way.

6 posted on 10/27/2001 12:43:39 PM PDT by longleaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: longleaf
Self-imposed gas rations sounds too much like the Carter administration.

I remember the rations of the Carter administration, and have no problem with it.

VP Cheney revealed the mindset of this administration when he derided conservation measures a few months ago. If you are an oilman, you want people to use oil—period.

Yeah I know.... made me chuckle when he said it! Gee, I wonder why he wants to promote buying over priced oil????? Could it be that someone he knows might have a vested interest in oil??????

This administration has tried to cutback the amount of funds the terrorists have by freezing their assets. Bring them to their knees via lack of funds. So, why is this theory not good for OPEC????

7 posted on 10/27/2001 12:51:23 PM PDT by ET(end tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ET(end tyranny)
OK now is the time to STOP these b*st*Rds and developed alternate sources. Do we like being gouged by these yahoos? Our goal should be to make Saudi Arabia's biggest and only export Cat Litter.
8 posted on 10/27/2001 12:56:14 PM PDT by L`enn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ET(end tyranny)
I'd like to suggest that we try and put ourselves on self imposed gas rations.

Own a van or SUV? Park it unless you're doing something which requires it. Get a dodge neon or a motorcycle for all the bombing around with just yhou in the vehicle.

9 posted on 10/27/2001 1:11:27 PM PDT by medved
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: relee
So what? This has been a fact of life since the seventies. If you don't like it, cut out your driving. Only liberals whine about high gas prices. Any knowledgeable person knows that cartels price increases cannot be sustained, simply because it is anathema to what they want: HI OUTPUT, HI PRICES. The market ALWAYS will overrule any cartel actions in the longer run. Cartel pricing is a pyrrhic victory.
10 posted on 10/27/2001 1:20:49 PM PDT by DebtsPaid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L`enn
Our goal should be to make Saudi Arabia's biggest and only export Cat Litter.

After making my last post I wondered, 'When is trading with the enemy NOT trading with the enemy?' When you want something they have. Could this be why we haven't or WON'T declare war on some of these nations? Because then if we bought their oil we'd be technically trading with the enemy? Granted only 'some' of the people from these nations have declared war on the US, but what does that tell you when the host nation doesn't DO anything about these 'people'?? That they quietly sanction the idea?

11 posted on 10/27/2001 1:23:54 PM PDT by ET(end tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dane
ANWR is a four letter word to Tom Daschle.

Selfsufficiency is a four letter word to Tom Daschole.
12 posted on 10/27/2001 1:23:55 PM PDT by facedown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DebtsPaid
HI OUTPUT, HI PRICES

And when they 'cutback' output???? Higher prices still! LOL

13 posted on 10/27/2001 1:25:31 PM PDT by ET(end tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: relee
Too bad, I was just getting used to cheaper gas prices.

Yeah, unleaded regular was as low as 97.9 cents at a few stations around here yesterday. Georgia has a low state tax on gasoline.

14 posted on 10/27/2001 1:29:01 PM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: facedown
Can anyone spell ANWR?

Yes... Drillnowdammit.

15 posted on 10/27/2001 1:32:59 PM PDT by oust the louse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: relee
It's their oil, they can do what they want. Of course, it will be seen as a hostile act to the American people who are already looking askance at the ME.
17 posted on 10/27/2001 1:52:30 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abwehr
Spot on!
18 posted on 10/27/2001 1:53:55 PM PDT by facedown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
It's their oil, they can do what they want.

If this war escalates it could all soon be OUR oil.

19 posted on 10/27/2001 2:02:18 PM PDT by RickyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: relee
Anyone who is opposed to drilling in ANWR or anywhere else there is oil in the USA is not only a terrorist supporter, but a terrorist themselves. Remember, no distinction is made between the terrorist and those who harbor them.
20 posted on 10/27/2001 2:06:51 PM PDT by GuillermoX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson