Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/05/2001 10:08:02 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JohnHuang2
The professor at the University of California at Berkeley said preliminary evidence indicates the structures withstood the impacts of the planes.

Ah. That would explain why they didn't fall down right away.

Whatever they pay this guy, it just isn't enough...

2 posted on 10/05/2001 10:14:39 PM PDT by Interesting Times
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Astaneh-Asl said he hopes his work might one day be used to help design a different structure perhaps using different materials that would keep a plane from piercing the core of a building and spilling its explosive cargo of jet fuel, he said.

It's unlikely that we will be plagued with more incidents of this kind, now that we have a radically different attitude -- keep the cockpit at all costs -- towards attempted jet hijackings. It wouldn't be cost effective to armor-shield all tall buildings this way.

Something which might make marginal sense would be a means of quickly delivering Halon to several floors of a building. Halon is used in fire extinguishing systems in computer rooms; it is expensive but it is not harmful to equipment or to people. A sufficient quantity of Halon would have put out the jet fuel fires from the 9/11 attacks.

3 posted on 10/05/2001 10:18:44 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
We put an middle easterner in charge of this? I hope this guy is being checkout. I didn't notice one sentient remark.
10 posted on 10/05/2001 10:38:00 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Damn, I must be a pretty good structural engineer. Although I've never studied structural engineering or architecture, I knew everything that this professor did. And I didn't spend two weeks looking at scrap metal.
12 posted on 10/05/2001 10:43:02 PM PDT by Koblenz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
If they was to rebuild the WTC I think they would be wise to use Space Shuttle like ceramic heat tiles to protect all vital structual supports if it is affordable.

My guess about the reason of the stuctural failure would be that thousands of gallons of burning jet fuel flowed down the elevator shafts into the basement and weakened the supports at that level. Take out the load bearing supports in the basement and you have an implosion effect, take out the supports on the 42nd floor and more likely your columns would fail earlier at the point of impact that other points and the tower would fall to one side like a tree cut down.

I am no engineer but I think this sad event will change the design of skyscrapers in the future.

29 posted on 10/05/2001 11:24:43 PM PDT by Swiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
The Physics of Turning a Tower Into a Cloud of Dust and Rubble
42 posted on 10/06/2001 12:06:17 AM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
so are they collecting evidence for a big trial in the hague? i wonder if johnny cochran will defend bin laden?

'if bin wasn't in the cockpit, then you must acquit'!

45 posted on 10/06/2001 12:26:23 AM PDT by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson