Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Jersey Introduces Annual EV Fee, Punishing Owners Who Go Green
Inside EVs ^ | Apr 2, 2024 | Tom Moloughne

Posted on 04/09/2024 7:49:07 AM PDT by Red Badger

The new "EV Tax" is the highest in the nation and will likely put the brakes on EV adoption in the Garden State.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

With the stroke of a pen, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy has unplugged the state's pro-electric-vehicle position, signing into law a new EV road tax that is the highest of its kind in the nation.

Starting in July, New Jersey EV owners must pay an annual $250 road tax fee in an effort to offset the state's loss in fuel tax revenue. The new fee will increase by $10 each of the next four years until it reaches $290 in 2028. To make matters worse, New Jersey requires buyers and leases of all new vehicles to pay four years of registration fees upfront and the new EV fee will be included in that initial payment.

Therefore, beginning in July, any new electric vehicle purchased or leased in New Jersey will cost $1,060 more than it does today. That's considerably damaging since the higher initial cost of an electric vehicle is one of the biggest impediments to EV adoption.

As a lifelong resident of New Jersey as well as a long-time EV owner, it pains me to see the state initiate what I consider an unreasonable tax on clean-energy vehicles so prematurely.

I say prematurely because I have always maintained that electric vehicles should pay their fair share of road taxes, which help fund the state's infrastructure repair and development. However, I believe that should only start once electric vehicles have reached a point of being 5% of the total light vehicle fleet in the state. Estimates have that figure currently at about 1.8%.

Additionally, once such a fee was imposed, I would support the amount to be similar to what the average combustion vehicle in its class pays per year through the state's gasoline tax. Murphy's current law will have many EV owners paying twice as much as the owners of a comparable combustion vehicle pay in the gasoline tax.

And the pain doesn't stop there. Since 2004, battery electric vehicles (BEVs) have enjoyed a sales tax exemption in New Jersey, and that luxury will now begin a three-year phase-out period. The sales tax exemption has been an enormous incentive to Garden State residents wanting to ditch the pump, helping to close the gap between the cost of a comparable combustion vehicle and the more expensive EV.

I understand the sales tax exemption wouldn't—or shouldn't go on forever. I figured that by the end of this decade EVs would have near cost-parity with combustion vehicles and the incentives wouldn't be needed anymore. However, today, and for the next few years, the incentives are still important in helping many that want an EV, afford it. The fact that the sales tax announcement was made at the same time the new EV road tax was signed into law made the news for New Jerseyians even harder to swallow.

I would also be remiss if I didn't mention the state's ChargeUp EV incentive program, which offers up to a $4,000 point of sale incentive on electric vehicles. Signed into law in 2020, ChargeUp is funded by the Board of Public Utilities which has $30 million set aside every year for 10 years to pay for the rebates. Each year since its inception, the fund runs out well before the year does, and the program gets suspended until the following year's funding is in place.

While the program's intentions were great, the way it has been administered has made it very difficult for dealers and EV buyers, because there are many months of the year when there is no rebate and no clear date when the program will receive its next traunch of funding.

I think that what's disappointed me most is that with the recent changes the state is going from one of the best states to buy an EV, to one where, over time, it will cost more to own one.

As a lifelong resident of New Jersey as well as a long-time EV owner, it pains me to see the state initiate what I consider an unreasonable tax on clean-energy vehicles so prematurely.

I say prematurely because I have always maintained that electric vehicles should pay their fair share of road taxes, which help fund the state's infrastructure repair and development. However, I believe that should only start once electric vehicles have reached a point of being 5% of the total light vehicle fleet in the state. Estimates have that figure currently at about 1.8%.

Additionally, once such a fee was imposed, I would support the amount to be similar to what the average combustion vehicle in its class pays per year through the state's gasoline tax. Murphy's current law will have many EV owners paying twice as much as the owners of a comparable combustion vehicle pay in the gasoline tax.

And the pain doesn't stop there. Since 2004, battery electric vehicles (BEVs) have enjoyed a sales tax exemption in New Jersey, and that luxury will now begin a three-year phase-out period. The sales tax exemption has been an enormous incentive to Garden State residents wanting to ditch the pump, helping to close the gap between the cost of a comparable combustion vehicle and the more expensive EV.

I understand the sales tax exemption wouldn't—or shouldn't go on forever. I figured that by the end of this decade EVs would have near cost-parity with combustion vehicles and the incentives wouldn't be needed anymore. However, today, and for the next few years, the incentives are still important in helping many that want an EV, afford it. The fact that the sales tax announcement was made at the same time the new EV road tax was signed into law made the news for New Jerseyians even harder to swallow.

I would also be remiss if I didn't mention the state's ChargeUp EV incentive program, which offers up to a $4,000 point of sale incentive on electric vehicles. Signed into law in 2020, ChargeUp is funded by the Board of Public Utilities which has $30 million set aside every year for 10 years to pay for the rebates. Each year since its inception, the fund runs out well before the year does, and the program gets suspended until the following year's funding is in place.

While the program's intentions were great, the way it has been administered has made it very difficult for dealers and EV buyers, because there are many months of the year when there is no rebate and no clear date when the program will receive its next traunch of funding.

I think that what's disappointed me most is that with the recent changes the state is going from one of the best states to buy an EV, to one where, over time, it will cost more to own one.

I'm certainly not the only person who shares these opinions. I reached out to Pam Frank, the CEO of ChargEVC, a non-profit coalition that promotes the sustainable growth of the electric vehicle market in New Jersey for her thoughts on the recent developments.

Frank sent me a copy of a letter the organization sent to members of the New Jersey Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee a few weeks ago along with a request to amend the new EV tax, and hopefully lower the annual fee to something more reasonable.

Below is an excerpt from the letter:

There are three main reasons supporting this position: First and foremost, it is imperative that we keep our eye on the ball. New Jersey has set aggressive statewide clean energy and EV adoption goals to combat the emissions that harm our environment and harm people’s health. The Murphy Administration and the New Jersey Legislature have prioritized efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and fight climate change.

This has included implementing a range of incentives to support the purchase of EVs and the charging infrastructure necessary to charge these vehicles. Imposing an EV fee of $250 would negate the impact of these rebates and tax credits. It would also slow progress towards achieving our statewide goals. In fact, a 2020 nationwide survey of current EV owners by UC Davis concluded that a $100 annual registration fee on EVs would reduce sales by over 10%.

At $250, New Jersey would have the highest, most punitive EV fee in the country. We must ensure that New Jersey remains a national leader in the fight against climate change.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: automotive; electric; fee; green; newjersey; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: z3n

Don’t forget more expensive for insurance.


21 posted on 04/09/2024 8:02:45 AM PDT by volare737 (Diversity is something to be overcome, not celebrated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Recall that the development of nuclear energy was hamstrung by what to do with nuclear waste. I think EV manufacturing should be curtailed until there’s plan to handle the disposal of the giant EV batteries.


22 posted on 04/09/2024 8:03:58 AM PDT by DeplorablePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
< Nelson>Ha ha!< /Nelson>

Statists gotta state.

(I'm not anti EV at all. Interesting tech, just with its own peculiar plusses and minuses. And won't do what the innumerate true believers in "Climate Change!(R)" think it will.)

23 posted on 04/09/2024 8:05:13 AM PDT by Lee N. Field ("And if you are Christ's, then you are Abraham's offspring, heirs according to promise" Gal 3:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: volare737

“more expensive for insurance”

When your ev spontaneously combusts in your garage and burns your house down who do you call first, your homeowners insurance company or your auto owners?


24 posted on 04/09/2024 8:05:58 AM PDT by V_TWIN (America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

We will pave the roads using recycled EV tires. They eat them up, so plenty of supply. (Don’t ask what tires are made from.)


25 posted on 04/09/2024 8:06:19 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> --- )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DeplorablePaul

They can be recycled. It’s not cheap, nor environmentally friendly. But it can be done.

Solid state batteries won’t need recycling nearly as often................


26 posted on 04/09/2024 8:09:12 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Saw this coming a mile away!

Also, this being New Jersey, do they require someone to plug in your EV as well?


27 posted on 04/09/2024 8:12:45 AM PDT by catman67 (14 gauge?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

It’s not that they hate EV’s, it’s that they LOVE taxes....


28 posted on 04/09/2024 8:14:18 AM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The masses have been made so devoid of the ability to think that they will grumble, and vote Dem anyway.


29 posted on 04/09/2024 8:14:40 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's going to take real, serious, hard times to wake the American public.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Also check the fees on EVs and Hybrids’ license plates.


30 posted on 04/09/2024 8:15:58 AM PDT by combat_boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fhayek

This tax is actually a good one. Roads and bridges need constant repairs and that is what the gasoline taxes support. Theses EV drivers have to pay for that as well, it’s just done all at once instead of a gallon at a time............... 😎


31 posted on 04/09/2024 8:16:16 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Get woke, go broke!


32 posted on 04/09/2024 8:18:03 AM PDT by VideoPaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Like others have said, roads require funding to be maintained. The funding source traditionally is based on who uses the roads and thereby the fuel tax was created. EVs are heavier than equivalent cars and wear roads more. EVs should be charged more than the equivalent gasoline / diesel powered vehicle if the principle of taxing based on usage.


33 posted on 04/09/2024 8:18:08 AM PDT by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

if the world cannot procure roadway materials it’s their own asphalt. “Soylent Green! it’s the new asphalt replacement...and ITS GREEN”.


34 posted on 04/09/2024 8:18:37 AM PDT by Qwapisking ("IF the Second goes first the First goes second" L.Star n )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: VideoPaul

Their ‘Free Ride’ is OVER, it’s time to pay the fiddler...............


35 posted on 04/09/2024 8:19:40 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Qwapisking

Kinda mushy after about a week, though..................


36 posted on 04/09/2024 8:20:16 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
At the rate these coal and NG powered cars are dropping in sales NJ won't get much in revenue anyway.  Added to that the drop-off in sales is on a exponential trajectory anyway - like earthquakes, orders of magnitude LOL.
 
And since Google acquired Youtube coverage has gotten even worse.  I made and posted the below video with a prescient and humorous dialogue, some 13 years ago and was shadowbanned some 50 hours later.  They also made the crystal clear video rather grainy, I hate them.

BTW, I was 100% correct but you have to click my 'creator page' for the video:

Electric cars for dummies

37 posted on 04/09/2024 8:23:17 AM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I understand, and I get it. You see, I live in New York State. We have gasoline taxes, and tolls, and mileage use taxes, and vehicle registration fees - and you can still lose the fillings in your teeth driving on our roads. Sure you need taxes to maintain your roads, but the people in charge are such poor managers of the taxpayer’s money, that they will squander it on non-transportation pet projects, and then when the roads and bridges are practically crumbling away, they will float a bond issue to ‘fix them’. So yes, tax the EV’s, but I just am skeptical of new taxes wherever they arise.


38 posted on 04/09/2024 8:23:29 AM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

All that virtue shouldn’t come for free. And no, I don’t feel your pain.


39 posted on 04/09/2024 8:24:08 AM PDT by ComputerGuy (Heavily-medicated for your protection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

EVs use the road, too. Pay up.


This. They are also heavier.


40 posted on 04/09/2024 8:28:06 AM PDT by cuban leaf (2024 is going to be one for the history books, like 1939. And 2025 will be more so, like 1940-1945.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson