1 posted on
03/18/2024 1:09:29 PM PDT by
bitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...
2 posted on
03/18/2024 1:09:50 PM PDT by
bitt
(<img src=' 'width=30%>)
To: bitt
3 posted on
03/18/2024 1:12:12 PM PDT by
rktman
(Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this๐ฉ? ๐ซ๐! ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐!)
To: bitt
โ My biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the governmentโ
thatโs the whole purpose of the bill of rights.
To: bitt
Just in?? I don’t know much about the case, but it does not take a genius to know how that idiot will vote. Nor the other three liberals.
5 posted on
03/18/2024 1:15:31 PM PDT by
odawg
To: bitt
The woman is the poster child for the expression โelections have consequencesโ.
6 posted on
03/18/2024 1:15:47 PM PDT by
sjmjax
To: bitt
Does she really have so little understanding of what the Bill of Rights is about?!
7 posted on
03/18/2024 1:16:01 PM PDT by
utahb52
To: bitt
Yes, Justice Brown, the whole point of the First Amendment is a constraint AGAINST so called government approved speech. If the government is allowed to designate approved speech for one reason, justices will in time extend that to any reason the government chooses. In the end, by judicial fiat alone the SCOTUS wll have redcated out the First Amendment to the Constitution.
9 posted on
03/18/2024 1:18:28 PM PDT by
Wuli
(ena)
To: bitt
There’s that pesky constitution again...
11 posted on
03/18/2024 1:20:13 PM PDT by
LeoTDB69
To: bitt
To: bitt
“your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the government in significant ways at the most important time.
I mean, what would you have the government do?”
Sit down, shut up and celebrate the wisdom of the founding fathers in establishing free speech into our Constitution.
To: bitt
So the government can be stopped from uttering a word?
15 posted on
03/18/2024 1:23:58 PM PDT by
Az Joe
(Live free or die)
To: bitt
But she’s not a biologist!
17 posted on
03/18/2024 1:26:20 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(The worst thing about censorship is โโโโโ โโ โโโโ โโโโโโโโ โ โโโโโโโ โโโโ. FJB.)
To: bitt
Ketanji Brown Jackson was appointed to the SC just for cases like this. She will help hold down the liberal female trio token appointees.
And yes, her comments are chilling.
If the SC sides with the government, then it's a no brainer that ALL websites that do not tow the government line will be attacked and closed down.
18 posted on
03/18/2024 1:26:46 PM PDT by
ducttape45
(Proverbs 14:34, "Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.")
To: bitt
This woman has to be the most dangerously stupid human being to ever by on the court.
20 posted on
03/18/2024 1:27:44 PM PDT by
Dave911
To: bitt
Jackson also said that the government can outright ban all firearms.
21 posted on
03/18/2024 1:27:57 PM PDT by
Thunder90
(All posts soley represent my own opinions)
To: bitt
24 posted on
03/18/2024 1:30:13 PM PDT by
Pajamajan
(Pray for our nation. Never be a slave in a new Socialist America..)
To: bitt
To a leftist, it isn’t government censorship if THEY don’t like the speech!
*rolls eyes*
They are too blinded by Trump hate to see how silly their argument is!
To: bitt
To a leftist, it isn’t government censorship if THEY don’t like the speech!
*rolls eyes*
They are too blinded by Trump hate to see how silly their argument is!
To: bitt
She’s not really a judge - She’s a community organizer in a black robe.
27 posted on
03/18/2024 1:34:59 PM PDT by
ProudDeplorable
(Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty. ~ Ronald Reagan)
To: bitt
She’s a f***ing idiot and the democrats put her on the SC?
We’re doomed if we can’t get rid of these democrat morons.
28 posted on
03/18/2024 1:35:45 PM PDT by
Bullish
(...And just like that, I was dropped from the ping-list)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson