Federal judge rules $1.7 trillion spending bill passed by Congress in 2022 is unconstitutional

Fox News via MSN ^ | 2/27/24 | Greg Wehner

[kiryandil]

When Republicans took control of the House in 2022, they ditched the proxy rule after challenging it in court unsuccessfully.

Ah!

But which court, and which judge? This appears to matter greatly in our phony, cr@p third world banana republic "justice" system.

In this case, James Wesley Hendrix is a Trump judge.

[Brown Deer]

So, can we garnish the paychecks of Congress for the next million years?

[Openurmind]

“You want the federals govt to define reasonable? and redefine it and.”

I have been a businessman and employer all my life. And some addictions absolutely need a forced intervention or they kill innocent souls.

The most deadly of those addictions is radical extremist greed to the point of killing human beings like flies.

[Bonemaker]

So what’s the penalty for these criminal filth?

[Svartalfiar]

So, if voting by proxy instead of in person makes a spending bill invalid,

That's not the argument. Proxy is a different issue, but the main this here is that there weren't even enough Reps physically present to have a quorum to do business at all.

[Bonemaker]

“But which court, and which judge?”

Judge Dredd.

[ProtectOurFreedom]

Close enough in principal to make my argument.