Posted on 02/22/2024 5:58:37 AM PST by Miami Rebel
How do you explain Mike’s IT guy who hacked and changed votes inside the courtroom? The machine is a glorified copier that can change votes and has been shown to numerous times.
I watched them last election and the holes are so big you can drive a train through them. No real signature verification, no chain of custody, can easily be hacked and changed. Just a simple way to steal.
Nope...Pillow guy.
I think it might have been both though. This was an attack from multiple vectors.
There was the data feed from Edison Research on election night, used and presented by most media outlets, that showed data between updates making no sense. As they went through the round-robin updates of each State there were multiple instances of the vote count barely changing (e.g. 1,500,000 to 1,550,000) but the percentages changing from Trump being up by 1 or 2%, only to suddenly be behind by the same amount. The math was impossible without votes being switched.
I have the raw data feed from that night somewhere, along with a python script that goes through the data to find these instances. There were several of them. This was shared in some circles online. I always thought it’d make it to the courtroom - never did.
See Post #17. I'm not saying it's impossible to hack a voting computer and change vote totals. I'm saying it's unnecessary to do it when the whole election-rigging process is built on dumping (potentially) millions of fraudulent ballots in the mail or in drop boxes.
In fact, the ballot-dumping process really only works if the vote-counting machines work as they are designed to work.
We need to buy more pillows, sheets, towels and whatever else he has for sale. I do need a new pillow. I found a “my pillow” for $20 and I like it.
2. I would dismiss any assessment of election results based on changes in vote tallies posted by the media. They are notoriously inaccurate and prone to errors -- not just by the media, but by the election precincts that report them in real time.
Rapin’ Bill stooge John R. Tunheim, senior feral “judge” from the district of Minnesota, so it was political.
Yeah those “live numbers” are such a game of telephone. Some dude tells some other dude to call this office and tell them these numbers, and then eventually the office they’re all calling adds all the numbers and shoots them out to where the TV guys pull them from, who then have some guy read them to some other guy that puts them in the graphics, and then the talking head will say them when they land on the screen, often just repeating what the producer is saying in his ear. The whole process is basically a random number generator. IMHO there should be no “live results”, no projections, nothing. Everybody gets a week to do their counting, nothing goes public until the following Tuesday. Instant results are just chaos that encourages people to think it’s rigged.
Wrong, they duplicate everything. In Oregon we have had fraud by mail for decades and hackable machines. They do both.
Using multiple methods to rig an election is like sending three crews of bank robbers to hold up the same bank. It's not just overkill ... the multiple methods add unnecessary complications and opportunities for disruption.
They have owned the state for 40 years, they have nothing to worry about.
Re: 2 - Not at all.
Lindell made a challenge to CISSPs at the Cyber Symposium and someone took him up on it.
FYI
Actually it was demonstrated in open court with a pen borrowed from state prosecutor that the machines could easily be set to allow further programming of election results. So yes, it is the machines.
Further, not a single state has announced a successful audit of their Voter Registration Rolls to remove obsolete and illegal 'registered' voters.
Opinion and Order - https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24437140-zeidmanlindell022124
WARNING: Don’t you dare go against the Democrats.
Fractal real time voting
Omega4ameica
It’s multiple avenues. Packets, ai, cyber, erasing tracks, machines, suitcases, hand counts.
It’s a web
“It’s a web”
I think of it as a very large and evil oak tree. With lots and lots of little “ACORNs”.
Another lying/corrupt/idiot Federal Judge. We have far too many of them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.