Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal Agencies Already Prepping to Sabotage a Potential Trump Presidency - "The rule could serve as a vital defense for federal employees if Trump wins."
Front Page Magazine ^ | 20 Feb, 2024 | Daniel Greenfield

Posted on 02/20/2024 6:55:26 AM PST by MtnClimber

The “resistance” is at it again.

President Joe Biden’s allies are getting antsy about his administration’s pileup of unfinished environmental rules — especially with the threat that a second Trump presidency could undo them all.

Biden’s agencies are facing a deadline this spring to finish some of their most important regulations to ensure that a Republican Congress and White House can’t erase them next year, including a crackdown on power plants’ climate pollution, protections for endangered species and a bid to protect federal employees from politically motivated firings.

That last one is an understandable priority for federal bureaucrats and appointees worried that they’ll be fired.

This obviously raises the question of who actually runs the federal government, but if you still don’t know the answer to that, try running for office and actually passing a law. The folks who actually run things are busy insulating themselves from being subjected to the rigors of democratic change in the name of protecting democracy from the people who vote for things that they shouldn’t.

The scramble to finish the regulations is crucial to determining how much of Biden’s ambitious legacy may survive past the November election, as the two likely nominees promote sharply contrasting views on climate change, green energy and the power of federal agencies.

The Biden administration has promised action on a lot of fronts, and how soon it rolls those rules out could determine how easy they are for a future administration to unravel. Policy insiders and Biden administration allies are urging agencies’ rule writers to keep their eye on the clock.

The polite fiction is that the feds are supposed to write rules objectively and impartially. This is a press release stating that the opposite is true and that the rules are being rushed out for purely partisan reasons.

Considering that this was the exact claim used to undermine the Trump administration’s executive orders and other decisions in court, including those that involved setting aside executive orders and other debris from the Obama administration which had somehow acquired the force of law by the mere fact that Obama wanted them done, it ought to be an important argument used when challenging some of these same rules in court.

On the table is Biden’s car ban.

EPA rule writers are hustling behind the scenes to wrap up work on a suite of big Biden regulations on climate, water and chemicals this year…

Closely watched climate rules, such as revamped tailpipe pollution limits for cars and trucks, are expected in March as well. Those rules, under review at the White House, could lead to electric vehicles making up two-thirds of car and light truck sales as soon as 2032, the EPA has estimated.

Nah, they won’t. It’ll just mean that the majority of Americans won’t be able to afford to buy new cars.

But the real meat of it is the bureaucratic resistance protecting itself from the consequences of its coup.

Last year, the Office of Personnel Management proposed stronger guardrails for the civil service. The regulation says career employees keep their civil service protections unless they voluntarily accept a political appointee job and adds requirements when reclassifying career positions as political appointments.

The rule could serve as a vital defense for federal employees if Trump wins in November.

That allows Dems to protect the activists they’ve embedded into the federal government and allow them to continue undermining America from within.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: danielgreenfield; deepstate; election; greenfield; leftism; sabotage; sedition; sultanknish; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: MtnClimber

Of COURSE they are…

Suppose, for some odd reason, that Trump actually can overcome the steal in 2024 and wins the election..

Do we REALLY think they’re gonna just back off, roll over and say - “okay.. we lost..”???

They are shoring up EVERY last agency they can to make his (possible) Presidency absolutely null and void. They plan on keeping him so busy with nonsense (as they are doing now) that he will get nothing accomplished.


41 posted on 02/20/2024 7:58:20 AM PST by joethedrummer (We can't vote our way out of this, folks..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Fire them anyway


42 posted on 02/20/2024 8:13:15 AM PST by chuckb87
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EvilCapitalist

This should be considered Treason.
_________________________
Of course, it’s treason, but where is the recourse? Once tyranny gets a hold of a country, the slope into the dark abyss gets steeper and grows swifter by the day. Given the backdrop of the Communist Left’s persecution of Trump and their near-total control of the country, there is no way in hell that Trump will be recognized as having won the coming election. By hook or crook, they will nullify the results, fraudulently claim Trump stole the election, and the courts will go along with it. Abject chaos will ensue. There is a better way to restore normalcy and that is through a carefully planned and executed declaration of martial law with court-martials before the election. Some have indicated that Trump planned for this contingency before leaving office by signing executive orders that presently give him the power to declare martial law.


43 posted on 02/20/2024 8:26:18 AM PST by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: spankalib

This is because the definition of “democracy” has changed.

Mike Benz makes this quite clear in his interview with Tucker Carlson.

“Democracy” is now consensus-building within elite, government sponsored intuitions. If they spend a lot of energy coming up with an idea then the public is to rubber stamp it in the next “election”.

If not the public is destroying “democracy”.


44 posted on 02/20/2024 8:46:28 AM PST by packagingguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

“Democracy” is now consensus-building within elite, government sponsored intuitions. If they spend a lot of energy coming up with an idea then the public is to rubber stamp it in the next “election”.


Just as it was in the German “Democratic” Republic.


45 posted on 02/20/2024 8:47:50 AM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
Federal Feral Agencies...
46 posted on 02/20/2024 8:50:25 AM PST by RckyRaCoCo (Time to throw them out of the Temple...again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bk1000

That’s something they would bury or explain away as an ‘accident’. They don’t want the ‘little people’ aka proles getting ideas and then have a bunch of copycats join in. That would be unmanageable.

The figureheads/front-men aren’t the ones plotting this out, since they’re not that bright (an example is BiteMe), the staff and outside ‘agencies’ are who are causing this attack on the constitution and the Republic


47 posted on 02/20/2024 9:12:35 AM PST by curious7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

The hysteria can stop. You can always undo a rule. Easiest way is through personnel. People will just not enforce, plus courts will eradicate.

After a while the doomers just get ridiculous.


48 posted on 02/20/2024 10:03:12 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packagingguy

That makes complete sense.


49 posted on 02/20/2024 10:48:00 AM PST by spankalib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Those who shoot at the king...


50 posted on 02/20/2024 3:01:18 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 100American; 21twelve; 2nd amendment mama; A Conservative Thinker; Absolutely Nobama; ...
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam and leftism.

The polite fiction is that the feds are supposed to write rules objectively and impartially. This is a press release stating that the opposite is true and that the rules are being rushed out for purely partisan reasons.

Ping out to the Daniel Greenfield Ping! List.

As always, please FReepmail me if you want on or off the esteemed Daniel Greenfield ping list.

Daniel Greenfield's website: The Sultan Knish blog

51 posted on 02/20/2024 8:36:36 PM PST by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

One of my favorite movies! Ha!


52 posted on 02/20/2024 8:52:53 PM PST by Mama Shawna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Manuel OKelley

This case is more than likely why they are trying to get this done. They may be seeing the writing on the wall..


53 posted on 02/20/2024 8:55:57 PM PST by Mama Shawna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: shotgun

I’ll have what you’re having.Sounds like good stuff.


54 posted on 02/20/2024 9:26:40 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mama Shawna

what’s it’s title?


55 posted on 02/21/2024 4:24:34 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Mars Attacks. Here’s a link to a short YouTube clip, ack ack! https://youtu.be/7vSCJ9vKICQ?si=1q-g4nI6mSudnVm4


56 posted on 02/21/2024 6:26:11 AM PST by Mama Shawna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: texas booster

No surprise here


57 posted on 02/21/2024 12:04:00 PM PST by Milagros (Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Mama Shawna

I’ve seen it, but didn’t remember the scene.


58 posted on 02/21/2024 5:35:20 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Any rule that one party can make, the next one can find a way around it.


59 posted on 02/22/2024 2:13:06 PM PST by oldbrowser ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber; All

Plot thickens


60 posted on 02/23/2024 12:50:12 PM PST by Milagros (Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson