Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIVE: Fulton County Judge Hears Evidence on Motion to Disqualify Fani Willis DAY TWO
Right Side Broadcasting | 2/16/24 | staff

Posted on 02/16/2024 5:40:14 AM PST by CFW

Fulton County Judge hearing Evidence on Motion to Disqualify Fani Willis - Day Two

YouTube link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAh1zCg0sXQ

Rumble link:

https://rumble.com/v4dnbvl-live-fulton-county-judge-hears-evidence-on-motion-to-disqualify-fani-willis.html

Links to Threads of Day One of Hearing:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4217635/posts

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4217521/posts

Other articles regarding the testimony:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4217616/posts

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4217690/posts

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4217682/posts


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: adamabbate; anarodriguez; annacross; ashleighmerchant; austindabney; bimalchopra; bradley; craiggillen; durantepartridge; fani; fanilive; faniwillis; fultoncounty; jeffdisantis; jenniferlittle; jocelynwade; johnbmerchantiii; johncfloydiii; johnmerchant; johnmerchantiii; michaelroman; nathanwade; princessdie; robinyeartie; roybarnes; scottmcafee; stevesadow; terrencebradley; trump; wade; willis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500501-514 last
To: SteveH

Here is princess “DIE” in a short clip with her tips for women.

https://freebeacon.com/democrats/pro-tips-with-fani-willis/


501 posted on 02/17/2024 6:06:10 PM PST by CFW (I will not comply!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 499 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Jason Whitlock

Fani Willis Embarrasses Black Women, Emasculates Men, Turns Courtroom into Beauty Shop | Ep 622

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnE9mLbDlug


502 posted on 02/17/2024 6:32:00 PM PST by Texan4Life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

> Kemp talking about Fani pre hearing.

Aug 31, 2023


503 posted on 02/17/2024 6:33:16 PM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies]

To: All

Fani Willis’ Testimony in Trump Georgia Case: Behavior and Body Language

Dr. G explains
2/17/2024

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgGQr6id_YY

this guy despite his bona fides seems intent on portraying willis as being truthful. however, read the following comment from a viewer:

“Narcissists and pathological liars lie with confidence. They convince themselves that it doesn’t matter if something is actually true if they think “you can’t prove I am lying”. If you don’t think lying is wrong you won’t be nervous about it. I’m not saying she is those things, just that these indicators only work if the person is ashamed or afraid of getting caught.”


504 posted on 02/18/2024 4:26:28 AM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Agree.


505 posted on 02/18/2024 4:53:30 AM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel (No weapon formed against me shall prosper! (Isaiah 54:17))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

Agree


506 posted on 02/18/2024 4:56:12 AM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel (No weapon formed against me shall prosper! (Isaiah 54:17))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Chewbarkah

Great point


507 posted on 02/18/2024 8:12:00 AM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel (No weapon formed against me shall prosper! (Isaiah 54:17))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 493 | View Replies]

To: All

‘We’ve opened up a whole area’: Judge, lawyers stunned as Trump RICO special prosecutor attacks witness who was helping them all day, opening door for new revelations

COLIN KALMBACHER
Law and Crime
Feb 16th, 2024, 6:15 pm

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/weve-opened-up-a-whole-area-judge-lawyers-stunned-as-trump-rico-special-prosecutor-attacks-witness-who-was-helping-them-all-day-opening-door-for-new-revelations/#disqus_thread

from a comment:

“Fulton County code (Willis & Wade are such) has policies regarding the hiring of relatives (which includes romantic partners), requiring disclosure and approval (precisely to avoid conflict of interest).

“...it is the responsibility of the applicant to fully disclose the relationship to the Appointing Authority before the offer of employment is accepted. The intentional failure to disclose a relative relationship constitutes a violation of this Policy and may be grounds for rescission of the offer of employment, non-selection and/or discipline, up to and including termination.””


508 posted on 02/18/2024 6:40:11 PM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

why fani willis is not disqualified under georgia law
richard painter, et al
jan. 21, 2024
just security

https://www.justsecurity.org/91368/why-fani-willis-is-not-disqualified-under-georgia-law/

(note: recommends wade voluntarily step aside)

step aside, fani willis
richard painter
the atlantic (paywall)
fe. 18, 2024

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/02/fani-willis-fultun-trump/677506/


509 posted on 02/18/2024 10:18:02 PM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Fani Willis Hearing Could Be Upended by Nathan Wade Texts

Published Feb 19, 2024 at 7:19 AM EST
Updated Feb 19, 2024 at 8:35 AM EST
Newsweek

https://www.newsweek.com/fani-willis-georgia-hearing-nathan-wade-texts-1871102


510 posted on 02/19/2024 6:42:14 AM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The Georgia case against Trump may be fatally compromised

BY ANDREW FLEISCHMAN, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR
02/20/24 12:00 PM ET
The Hill

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/4477515-the-georgia-case-against-trump-may-be-fatally-compromised/


511 posted on 02/20/2024 10:32:06 PM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Fani Willis Faces Double Whammy in Fight to Keep her Job

Natalie Venegas
Newsweek
Published Feb 21, 2024 at 4:04 PM EST
Updated Feb 21, 2024 at 5:04 PM EST

https://www.newsweek.com/fani-willis-faces-double-whammy-fight-keep-her-job-1872196


512 posted on 02/21/2024 11:01:53 PM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

the state tried to attack bradley as a witness by attempting to call ana rodriguez and the man bun guy. judge mcafee disallowed most testimony under the premise that it fell under an exemption described in “Rule 608(b).” I wanted to try to find out where this rule is described and why it applies.

Using a web search, I found something called the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE for short). Under FRE, I found a Rule 608 as follows:

Rule 608. A Witness’s Character for Truthfulness or Untruthfulness
(a) Reputation or Opinion Evidence. A witness’s credibility may be attacked or supported by
testimony about the witness’s reputation for having a character for truthfulness or
untruthfulness, or by testimony in the form of an opinion about that character. But evidence
of truthful character is admissible only after the witness’s character for truthfulness has
been attacked.
(b) Specific Instances of Conduct. Except for a criminal conviction under Rule 609, extrinsic
evidence is not admissible to prove specific instances of a witness’s conduct in order to
attack or support the witness’s character for truthfulness. But the court may, on crossexamination, allow them to be inquired into if they are probative of the character for
truthfulness or untruthfulness of:
(1) the witness; or
(2) another witness whose character the witness being cross-examined has testified about.
By testifying on another matter, a witness does not waive any privilege against selfincrimination for testimony that relates only to the witness’s character for truthfulness

I can understand the concern about limiting the number of secondary issues in a hearing to a minimum for time reasons, and that this Rule 608(b) might be used to disqualify the testimony of witness Rodgriguez in the alleged state attempt to impeach state witness Bradley.

However, what I am wondering is whether this Rule 608(b) (if I have found the correct Rule 608(b)) could be used to deny entry of the cellhawk cell phone tower analysis affidavit provided by Mittelstadt. Does the affidavit fall into a different category of evidence than extrinsic evidence as used in Rule 608(b)? My legalese is rudimentary.


513 posted on 02/27/2024 12:56:19 AM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

Guy is lying.


514 posted on 02/27/2024 11:19:32 AM PST by CWW (Pray for God's Protection!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 513 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500501-514 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson