Anyhow, links at the source and pics can be found on Twitter. I'm not going to post any here. You can use your imagination.
Imagine that these were images of Donald Trump…… think there would be this outrage?
“The development and dissemination of fake images — especially those of a lewd nature — without someone’s consent must be made illegal,”
My first reaction to that was laughter.
The AI genie is already out of the bottle, SAG-AFTRA.
The article doesn’t even explain who SAG-AFTRA is.
Or not. :-P
As vile as those images might be, this is a First Amendment issue. The only possible exception might be if such images are clearly presented as genuine, when they are not.
You don’t want to be the target of such filth? Fine. Fair enough. Then don’t be a famous actor or singer. Go be a plumber or forest ranger.
I believe Breitbart already posted one or two of them. I’m surprised they were able to at all.
Well court already ruled ai kiddie porn is not kiddie porn.
So good luck if they didn’t have an issue with kiddie porn getting them to take Taylor more seriously
Someone can create the images...they just can’t profit from them.
I vaguely remember seeing cartoon images of famous actresses nude in National Lampoon back in the day. Later on, any idiot with Photoshop could superimpose someone’s head on a nude body. So this is only a refinement to an existing issue. Ms Swift is not the first or last victim, and there’s no way to stop the creation of the images. Only thing they can do is make it illegal to distribute or sell them. This will anger the porn industry, which, like it or not, is a huge money maker for a lot of democrats. Can’t anger a key constituency, so nothing will be done.
Thank God I didn’t click on any of that exceptionally erotic and realistic Taylor Swift AI porn. REAL MEN IMMEDIATELY AVERT THEIR EYES.
Nobody cares about the thousands of fake djt images though.