Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Fani Willis is violating the First Law of Holes. When you find yourself in one, the first thing you do is stop digging.
1 posted on 01/26/2024 10:08:36 AM PST by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: CFW

“Look, I’m guilty. But I refuse to help you gather evidence of that.”


2 posted on 01/26/2024 10:09:32 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

Fani Willis needs to be thrown into jail for contempt of Congress.

Just like what happened to Peter Navarro.


3 posted on 01/26/2024 10:11:31 AM PST by MeganC (There is nothing feminine about feminism. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW
Fani Willis is violating the First Law of Holes. >>>>>>>>>>>>

And the Second Law of holes is to only let your husband fill it.( Fani is married, 52 yoa, with two daughters and a hubby she never says anything about).

She is in clear violation of both the First and Second Laws of Holes.



5 posted on 01/26/2024 10:18:17 AM PST by Candor7 (Ask not for whom Trum p Trolls,He trolls for thee!),<img src="" width=500</img><a href="">tag</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

Case dismissed with prejudice.

And, make the documents public.


7 posted on 01/26/2024 10:26:04 AM PST by tired&retired (Blessings )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

The lil skank colluded with the Biden regime, otherwise she would NEVER have brought charges against him..It will be funny as hell when Willis is the one that ends up in prison and NOT Trump


9 posted on 01/26/2024 10:26:27 AM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

She probably has them stuffed up her fat crooked Fannie


11 posted on 01/26/2024 10:32:22 AM PST by NWFree (Sigma male 🤪)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW
Jordan asked for billing records from a public office that billed the federal government.

Where is the confidentiality here?

You can't claim confidentiality to cover up a crime committed by a public official.

-PJ

12 posted on 01/26/2024 10:33:49 AM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

“Pay no attention to my crooked arse...this is about dumping on Trump!”


17 posted on 01/26/2024 10:45:50 AM PST by RckyRaCoCo (Time to throw them out of the Temple...again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

Am I mistaken?

She’s essentially claiming “Attorney Client Privilege”?..........


19 posted on 01/26/2024 11:01:10 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

Fanny be da man, man.


21 posted on 01/26/2024 11:39:32 AM PST by Wdempsey (Democrats and slinkys.. Both useless but fun to push down stairs.v v ely)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

From X:

BREAKING: The Georgia State Senate has voted 30-19 to create a special committee to investigate Fani Willis.

It will have 6 Republicans and 3 Democrats, has full subpoena power, and can require testimony under oath.


24 posted on 01/26/2024 12:47:00 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

At some point she is going to get some confidential dismissal action by her overlords. Don’t put it past FJB to Seth Rich this B*tch.


25 posted on 01/26/2024 12:58:02 PM PST by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

But Trump can’t use Presidential immunity?

This crap is laughable.


27 posted on 01/26/2024 1:13:18 PM PST by Fledermaus (Is it me, or all of a sudden have the buried trolls are coming out on FR like cicadas? All noise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

As an Attorney I can assure you this is not just unethical, it is illegal. The actual legal term for what they did is called “Theft of Honest Services”. The larger liability they face is that for each case she brought against someone that Wade was paid for is another count. It could easily be charged as a RICO case. The systematic charging of crimes by the DA and the subsequent payments to Wade for working on those cases provided illegal benefits to them both. Hence the term, Theft of Honest Services. In essence it is illegal to charge someone with a crime so you or a boyfriend, spouse or relative, etc.. benefit from those charges in any way that would constitute a thing of value, monetarily or otherwise of value.

Comment was posted to this story:

https://nypost.com/2024/01/19/news/fani-willis-and-nathan-wade-traveled-together-amid-trump-probe/

It appears there are elements to honest services fraud:

To be guilty of violating the honest services fraud statute, you must owe a duty of honest service to someone and have deprived that person or entity of the duty owed by accepting a bribe or kickback from another person.

The federal fraud by mail or wire statutes, of which the honest services fraud statute is a part, provide for a fine or a maximum prison sentence of up to 20 years, or both. This prison sentence can be for each instance of mail or wire fraud, specifically each letter, each telephone call, and each email. Conceivably, prison sentences could total up to well over 100 years.

Willis overpaid her boyfriend Wade to prosecute third parties and she received kickbacks — free trips, plane tickets, resorts, etc. — using the stolen taxpayer funds.


29 posted on 01/26/2024 1:27:08 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

“confidentiality interests” mean she can’t hand over any documents.

Decoded: I’ve got nothing to give.


31 posted on 01/26/2024 1:58:39 PM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

Privacy rights, national security and secrecy are often abused to shield government from public scrutiny and culpability.

Why do you think HRC “really” ran her private server?

It’s so she had control over all the information and who gets to see it. Go put in a FOIA request, what’s on her box isn’t visible. The other thing usually done is the verbal meeting, i.e. no record. If it’s really dubious stuff, you meet on a tarmac someplace where no other ears can hear (feed Intel to a political candidate).

That’s our “transparent” government at work, serving the people and defending the Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic. Hahahaha


32 posted on 01/26/2024 7:37:22 PM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson