Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Special counsel Jack Smith argues Trump’s push to hold him in contempt in January 6 case is baseless
CNN ^ | 5 January 2024 | Hannah Rabinowitz

Posted on 01/06/2024 5:36:23 PM PST by Steely Tom

Special counsel Jack Smith pushed back Friday against Donald Trump’s assertions that the prosecutor should be held in contempt for submitting filings while the federal election interference case is paused, calling accusations that he was intentionally violating a court order “false” and “baseless.”

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: contempt; courtorder; jacksmith; prosecutor; specialcounsel; trump
The headline is essentially the article.
1 posted on 01/06/2024 5:36:23 PM PST by Steely Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

“Baseless” has become the key word for the media when “reporting” on any argument a conservative presents.


2 posted on 01/06/2024 5:41:11 PM PST by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

That’s the bun and the hot dog, but there’s the cheese (the government would never violate a court order), the chili ( not using filings to spread political propaganda) and several other lies to smother the whole stinking mess.


3 posted on 01/06/2024 5:46:20 PM PST by sopo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Pot, meet Kettle


4 posted on 01/06/2024 5:54:57 PM PST by Eccl 10:2 (Prov 3:5 --- "Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and lean not on your own understanding")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

I don’t see what is wrong with giving Trump’s lawyers more time to review the filings.

It’s not like someone’s rights or freedom are being further curtailed.


5 posted on 01/06/2024 5:57:22 PM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

The J6 case should have been tossed out within mere days of its initial filing.

There is no law or evidence tendered by Smith that justifies it.


6 posted on 01/06/2024 6:01:50 PM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Revoke prosecutorial immunity NOW!


7 posted on 01/06/2024 6:02:08 PM PST by grumpygresh (Civil disobedience by non-compliance; jury and state nullification. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

smith should be quite familiar with baseless charges
lol


8 posted on 01/06/2024 6:25:01 PM PST by aumrl (let's keep it real Conservatives )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

If I didn’t sign for it, I didn’t receive it.


9 posted on 01/06/2024 6:33:05 PM PST by RetiredTexasVet (We used to be a Republic, we are now a Fascist Klepto-Thugocracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin
I don’t see what is wrong with giving Trump’s lawyers more time to review the filings.

That's because you're an idiot. The whole purpose of filing these now while the case is on hold pending appeal is so they can say Trump's team has had it for weeks/months once the hold is lifted. They want to find Trump guilty before the election.
10 posted on 01/06/2024 6:34:31 PM PST by JoSixChip (2020: The year of unreported truths; 2021: My main take away from this year? Trust no one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Trump has broken him. He may end up in an asylum.


11 posted on 01/06/2024 7:06:29 PM PST by roving (Deplorable Listless Vessel Trumpist With Trumpitis and a Rainbow Bully)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Trump is over the Target.


12 posted on 01/06/2024 7:26:18 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

It’s pretty based, actually.


13 posted on 01/06/2024 8:03:32 PM PST by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
This is from the December Opinion and Order

“ As the D.C. Circuit recently made clear, a former President’s absolute immunity would constitute “an entitlement not to stand trial or face the other burdens of litigation,” such as discovery obligations. Blassingame v. Trump, No. 22-5069, 2023 WL 8291481, at *22 (D.C.Cir. Dec. 1, 2023) (citation omitted). Thus, because Defendant has appealed this court’s denialof that immunity, “whether the litigation may go forward in the district court is precisely what the court of appeals must decide.” Coinbase, 599 U.S. at 741 (quotation omitted).

Consequently, the court agrees with both parties that Defendant’s appeal automatically stays any further proceedings that would move this case towards trial or impose additional burdens of litigation on Defendant. Motion at 1; Gvt.’s Opp’n to Def.’s Mot. to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal at 3, ECF No. 182. Accordingly, and for clarity, the court hereby STAYS the deadlines and proceedings scheduled by its Pretrial Order, as amended. See ECF No. 39; see also Def.’s Reply in Supp. of Mot. to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal at 3, ECF No. 185

14 posted on 01/06/2024 8:56:49 PM PST by thegagline (Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater in 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom; All

FED GOV SCUM TRAITORS

It can’t be stated enough times.

SYSTEMIC.

Oh, and BLACKMAIL.


15 posted on 01/06/2024 10:07:41 PM PST by freepersup (“Those who conceal crimes are preparing to commit new ones.” ~Vuk Draskovic~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepersup

When was the last time JackBoot Smith got elected?

The Meritless Garland?

The Fey Wray?

Kris Krispy, even?


16 posted on 01/06/2024 10:39:59 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

“Baseless”? Didn’t he get the memo? It’s supposed to be “A threat to our democracy”.


17 posted on 01/06/2024 11:13:21 PM PST by FrankRizzo890
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson