Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Will Not Immediately Hear Presidential Immunity Case Despite Jack Smith’s Plea for Speed
Breitbart ^ | Dec 22, 2023 | Hannah Bleau Knudsen

Posted on 12/22/2023 1:38:19 PM PST by libstripper

The Supreme Court of the United States will not immediately hear former President Donald Trump’s case for presidential immunity, siding with Trump, who argued the court should reject Special Counsel Jack Smith’s request for a speedy review and decision.

The high court on Friday declined Smith’s request for a quick review, meaning that the case will go through the normal process in the appeals court and likely make its way to the SCOTUS from there.

This is a significant victory for Trump and a major setback for Smith, who is racing against the clock to put Trump on trial in front of a heavily Democrat jury before the election.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: certiorari; immunity; scotus; smith; trial; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
A really big win for Trump. This means his partial immunity claim and his accompanying appeal in the DC case of the judge's ruling against him will have to be litigated before the DC Court of Appeals before either Trump or Smith can appeal that court's decision to the Supreme Court. It's going to take a long time for that to happen and all the proceedings in DC are now stayed until it does happen and the Supreme Court reaches its decision on this massively important issue. Since the partial immunity claim affects just about all of the other cases that have been brought against Trump, those cases are also frozen until this decision and issue are finally litigated. In other words he's home free and running all the way through the election.

I might sound overoptimistic, but this also shows the Supreme Court probably has very serious doubts about the whole frivolous concept that Trump should be excluded from ballots because he "committed insurrection" on and around January 6.

1 posted on 12/22/2023 1:38:19 PM PST by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: libstripper
Jack just got a zoom call from George.

That's his law clerk who prepared the Supreme Court filing there on the left.


2 posted on 12/22/2023 1:46:16 PM PST by WeaslesRippedMyFlesh (Wake me up when somebody tells the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Jack Smith has a prime directive and only one job. He must convict Trump by any means necessary in that kangaroo court before November 7, 2024. his life will not be as charmed as his idol, Stalin’s chief prosecutor in the Moscow show trials, Andrey Vyshinsky. The Left is not very forgiving. Nor is Trump.


3 posted on 12/22/2023 1:48:21 PM PST by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

More here:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4205252/posts

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4205254/posts

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4205253/posts

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4205255/posts

😂👍


4 posted on 12/22/2023 1:52:40 PM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this💩? 🚫💉! 🇮🇱👍!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

And Roberts punts as he did in 2020 because he knows it would be 5-4 for Trump.


5 posted on 12/22/2023 2:08:36 PM PST by Waverunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper
That there was NO DISSENT in the decision should tell Jack Smith the following:

1. The USSC thinks he's a lousy POS who doesn't understand the judicial process AT ALL;

2. It's a huge signal to Smith that should the case make it up to the USSC, he's going to lose;

3. Emphasis on "should the case make it up to the USSC" is because Smith was never confirmed by the House as a Special Prosecutor, and therefore has about as much legal authority to bring any charges against Legit President Trump as my goldfish does.

6 posted on 12/22/2023 2:12:01 PM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale
May Jack Smith end up like this guy:

If you don't recognize him, click on the image

7 posted on 12/22/2023 2:18:11 PM PST by Vigilanteman (The politicized state destroys aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

To me this seems like SCOTUS dodged the issue and kicked the can down the road.

In my humble opinion they could have / should have taken the case and ruled in Trump’s favor.

But I am not very knowledgeable about intricate constitutional legalities.

Could someone here with that kind of expertise explain why this was not SCOTUS dodging the issue?


8 posted on 12/22/2023 2:23:49 PM PST by Iron Munro (Sun Tzu: "An evil man will burn his own nation to the ground to rule over the ashes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

Here’s a somewhat fictionalized clip of the arrest of Beria. The guy who played Marshal Zhukov steals the show.

https://youtu.be/EDOIzK8NuoU?si=0E9humJOz8KJhpN8


9 posted on 12/22/2023 2:24:59 PM PST by Leaning Right (The steal is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Jack’s under more stress than Nancy’s forehead. Fun to watch.


10 posted on 12/22/2023 2:36:54 PM PST by lurk (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper
mika and rachel madcow's reaction... jHxgthB
11 posted on 12/22/2023 2:38:05 PM PST by cuz1961 (USCGR Vet, John Adams Descendant , deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

I was thinking the same thing.

I hope someone responds to you inquiry.


12 posted on 12/22/2023 2:39:58 PM PST by kinsman redeemer (The real enemy seeks to devour what is good. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Does this include the GA case as well?


13 posted on 12/22/2023 3:08:39 PM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel (No weapon formed against me shall prosper! (Isaiah 54:17))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

It’s going to go like this:

SCOTUS: So, are you familiar with the Special Counsel statute?

Smith: Yes, Justice Alito.

SCOTUS: And you understand that any action brought by the government is dependent on that statute being fully realized.

Smith: Ah, yes, certainly, Justice Alito, it comports.

SCOTUS: So what would you call any action brought by the government which acts under color of authority but in fact is purveyed by someone who is not eligible to be a special counsel? Isn’t that fraud?

Smith: Well, Justice Alito, that seems theoretical.

SCOTUS: Is it? So you see yourself as having taken this role in full compiance and eligibility with the statute?

Smith: (coughs) Ah, the government requests a recess.


14 posted on 12/22/2023 3:09:06 PM PST by Thawtam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

Jack Smith can’t jump past state courts and go straight to the USSC. That’s not the proper procedure.


15 posted on 12/22/2023 3:12:45 PM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel (No weapon formed against me shall prosper! (Isaiah 54:17))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Why did he do it? He knows procedure well what the hell are they up to then? There was nothing to gain here by bypassing the other courts. Something stinks here….doesn’t seem right. They knew the outcome…there’s more here than meets the eye! EVIL SOB’s!! Be ready for more surprises tomorrow…they want trump and family to have a miserable Christmas and New Year’s Day! THEY ARE EVVVVIIILLL and from the pit of hell!


16 posted on 12/22/2023 3:41:45 PM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: WeaslesRippedMyFlesh

Why do you have to insult Darth Vader like that. Smith isfa4 more evil.


17 posted on 12/22/2023 3:42:55 PM PST by cowboyusa (YESHUA IS KING OF AMERICA! DEATH TO MARXISM AND LEFTISM! AMERICA, COWBOY UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: allendale

18 posted on 12/22/2023 3:56:16 PM PST by chief lee runamok ( Le Flâneur @Large)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

Presidential immunity would help Biden as much as Trump.


19 posted on 12/22/2023 4:03:53 PM PST by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel
Jack Smith can’t jump past state courts and go straight to the USSC

It's not a state case; it's federal case in progress in district court, though now paused pending appeals. The premise of the case was appealed to the DC Circuit, and Jack Smith tried to short-circuit that with an appeal directly to SCOTUS (kind of signalling that he expected to lose in the DC Circuit). Unusual but theoretically not improper.

20 posted on 12/22/2023 4:20:53 PM PST by SFConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson