This Ping List is for all news pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from this Ping List.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
More from the order:
“People have heard about the Robb Elementary School shooting in Uvalde, Texas. They have heard about Sandy Hook, Parkland, the Pulse nightclub, and other tragic mass shootings. But they do not hear of the AR-15 used in Florida by a pregnant wife and mother to defend her family from two armed, hooded, and masked home intruders. As soon as the armed intruders entered the back door of her home they pistol-whipped her husband — fracturing his eye socket and sinus cavity. Then they grabbed the 11-year old daughter. The pregnant wife and mother was able to retrieve the family AR-15 from a bedroom and fire, killing one of the attackers while the other fled.”
Again he idiot lawmakers can’t decipher “shall not be infringed”.
ABOUT TIME !!!!!!!
He is working his way to becoming a SCOTUS candidate...
Although, when moochelle is in the WH, the SCOTUS will probably be expanded to 30 in order to represent all sex labels and Islamic law...
The plan by the 9th Circus is to ignore Bruen, overrule Benitez and force the decision to SCOTUS to drag it out another couple years, probably hoping Thomas or another conservative will die.
“the legislature hoped to keep these modern weapons out of the hands of mass shooters”
False.
The legislature hoped to keep these modern weapons out of the hands of law abiding citizens.
Now we await the 7th circuit’s decision on the filthy Pritzker’s outrageous ban.
I always say to the Democrats that voting is a right and so is owning a firearm.
And applying their beloved 14th Amendment it should be no harder to vote than it is to buy a firearm.
Meaning I want the same strictures on voting that are applied to buying and owning firearms.
Any specifics? Does this ruling eliminate the fixed magazine requirement and the previous “bullet button” requirement?
Several years back the Cali ban was put on hold. Magpul then shipped thousands of magazines to California in cardboard boxes that looked like they were giving California the “finger”. Maybe they will do it again.
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSIGc3B6QXzG45nMDl6eTjgKjK1hNiXfgBSyhBAoGYbUpR5IE3Cqh2L6c_D-vFhd3gfesM&usqp=CAU
This Ping List is for all news pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from this Ping List.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
But they look really scary to children...
What I'd like to point out is a quote by the judge...
United States v. Miller held that sawed-off shotguns were not protected because there was no evidence that they were useful for military purposes.32 The obvious corollary was that weapons that could be useful for military purposes would be protected by the Second Amendment. It would be a mistake to think Heller and Miller are inconsistent.
This is the most clear reading I have ever seen in a legal opinion of the Miller decision. Almost everyone misses the point of the whole "absent any evidence" bit of the Miller decision. What it basically means, is that if the court had been informed that sawed off shotguns had been used during WWI in trench warfare, the decision would absolutely have gone the other way.
Almost everyone misses this.
God Bless This Judge
One honest judge !