Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

5th Circuit Rules Government Violated Speech Rights of Americans
UncoverDC ^ | 9/11/23 | Tracy Beanz

Posted on 09/11/2023 9:54:55 AM PDT by CFW

We have been waiting for almost a month for the decision from the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in this groundbreaking government censorship case. Its implications touch every single American citizen, and enormous precedent was set with this ruling. The following is a detailed analysis of the decision, and I hope that you will spend the time to read it.

First, a brief review.

The case, Missouri v. Biden, was filed last May by the states of Missouri and Louisiana, along with private plaintiffs, against numerous agencies in the federal government. Plaintiffs alleged that the government (including the FBI, White House, Surgeon General, and CISA, among many others) was forcing social media companies to censor speech by threat.

The Plaintiffs wanted a temporary injunction to STOP this activity as their case moved to trial. Judge Terry Doughty granted them expedited limited discovery and deposition to get the information they needed to prove a temporary injunction was warranted.

Of course, the government fought this the entire way but ultimately was widely unsuccessful. The information the plaintiffs received was absolutely mind-blowing. For certain, the government was coercing social media companies to censor—the discovery proved that beyond a shadow of a doubt.

[snip]

So, quickly, what we are about to go through is the 5th circuit decision on whether or not to UPHOLD the ruling that Judge Doughty made barring the government agencies listed from the actions listed above in the 4 set screenshot or to REVERSE that ruling. It isn’t about the entire case—ONLY the temporary injunction.

(Excerpt) Read more at uncoverdc.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: 5thcircuit; censorship; corruption; defunddhs; dhs; dissent; freespeech; internet; missourvbiden; socialmedia; technotyranny
Since corporate media is portraying the 5th Circuit's decision as mostly a win for the government, I thought others might enjoy the dissection of the Order by Tracy Beanz.
1 posted on 09/11/2023 9:54:55 AM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CFW
corporate media is portraying the 5th Circuit's decision as mostly a win for the government

Wouldn’t that be “misinformation” and shouldn’t the media not printed that... 🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐

2 posted on 09/11/2023 10:14:20 AM PDT by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show hosts to me.... Sting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

what is the penalty for violating the Constitution?


3 posted on 09/11/2023 10:14:37 AM PDT by joshua c (to disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives, cut the cable tv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lockbox

Here is ABC’s headline and reporting on the Fifth Circuit’s opinion.

“Appeals court scales back order squelching Biden administration contact with social media platforms”

https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/appeals-court-scales-back-order-squelching-biden-administration-103043331

“A federal appeals court Friday significantly whittled down a lower court’s order curbing Biden administration communications with social media companies over controversial content about COVID-19 and other issues.”


4 posted on 09/11/2023 10:31:44 AM PDT by CFW (I will not comply!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Maybe they should of used the “matter is under investigation” so no comment scam......


5 posted on 09/11/2023 10:34:24 AM PDT by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show hosts to me.... Sting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: joshua c

Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.

For the purpose of Section 242, acts under “color of law” include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official’s lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.

The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.

TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.


6 posted on 09/11/2023 10:39:11 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: joshua c

Oddly, there doesn’t seem to be one.


7 posted on 09/11/2023 10:51:31 AM PDT by pingman (It's a Clown World, and we're paying for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

These control freaks need to be reminded of this 10 times a day until they get it.

Life in prison or the death penalty for depriving a citizen of their rights is serious business.


8 posted on 09/11/2023 11:37:35 AM PDT by Boomer (X-Twitter is NOT a free speech platform. The scummy Marxists are back in charge. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pingman

There is one but it isn’t enforced like it should be.


9 posted on 09/11/2023 11:38:29 AM PDT by Boomer (X-Twitter is NOT a free speech platform. The scummy Marxists are back in charge. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Just another decision to be ignored, government will just be more discreet and continue having corporations do their bidding.


10 posted on 09/11/2023 11:48:53 AM PDT by itsahoot (Many Republicans are secretly Democrats, no Democrats are secretly Republicans. Dan Bongino.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

If we hang one, we’d have to hang ‘em all. I just got suspended on FB for saying so. “Inciting violence” or some such balderdash. Wait.... Someone’s knocking at my doo..........CRASH!.........BAM!............


11 posted on 09/11/2023 12:58:19 PM PDT by pingman (It's a Clown World, and we're paying for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CFW

BFL


12 posted on 09/11/2023 6:29:35 PM PDT by VTenigma (Conspiracy theory is the new "spoiler alert")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson