Posted on 08/11/2023 11:48:54 AM PDT by navysealdad
Whenever someone starts telling the truth about the globalist/rino/rat narrative, they get shut down. It has happened to me and will continue to happen to anyone who doesn’t tow the Marxist line.
Section 230 needs to go away so these tech companies can be sued in class action suits. Millions of people have been censored, banned, suspended without good cause on social media platforms just to silence them.
And we see this daily...
Alex said that there would be distraction attacks.
Note that the maximum Ukie propagandist on this thread has got nothing good about the Great Spring-Summer-Fall-Winter Counteroffensive, so he's launching attacks on Ritter and the ruble [tatters! it's in TATTERS, I tell you!!].
Sad when that's all they've got. But Alex predicted it. 
This thread lends support to the fact that people with unpopular views on Washington’s war in Ukraine are being censored, insofar as people are making completely irrational arguments to justify censoring him.
Scott Ritter, the Putin stooge, convicted of:
-Indecent exposure
-Unlawful conduct with a minor (3 charges)
-Criminal attempt to corrupt a minor
-Criminal use of a communications device
Sentenced to 5 1/2 years in prison
He’s a convicted pedo. Choose a better spokesman for your cause.
The defense calls Jeffery Toobin to the stand...
LOL!
“I’ve listened to many of his segments.”
That explains it all.
I may not agree with his pedophilia.
Defending a homoglobalist Ukrainian dictator is not a good look.
Ukraine takes money from the pedo in the white house and his trafficking spawn.
NAFO bots routinely report and harass on all platforms. At least on twit there’s some recourse now
Um, I basically agree with what Ritter says, but fellow high school students are NOT the same thing.
If there is a difference in age of three years or less, I believe that is much different.
That said, Ritter is right about some things.
Just for clarity, Scott Ritter was 40 when he was arrested for soliciting a 16 year old for sex the first time. He was 48 when he was arrested for soliciting a 15 year old for sex the second time.
His defense was not that he wasn't attracted to 15 year old girls, but that he knew the police officer posing as a 15 year old, whom he sent a video of himself beating his meat to, was at least 18 and he was just getting his kicks by sending a video of himself beating his meat to a person pretending to be 15 somehow.
If I understand your "further clarity" statement correctly, what he did is not just illegal in 17 states, it's probably illegal in more than 17 states. In his second arrest for soliciting a minor for sex, he was nearly fifty, and he sent a video of himself masturbating to a police officer posing as a 15 year old girl.
Is this really what you want to hitch your horse to? That even under the most charitable of interpretations of the circumstances, was that Scott Ritter was a man over the age of 45 who got his kicks filming and then sending a video of himself masturbating to a person pretending to be a 15 year old girl?
Unless there's some sort of entrapment situation that hasn't come out even in conspiracy channels in the last decade to explain the situation away in a plausible fashion, Scott Ritter is, at its absolute most charitable best, a guy who gets his rocks off by cosplaying as a pedophile but hasn't actually diddled a child.
That was mainly my point, that his sexual past was not as important as the fact the the Deep State was trying to silence him over his opinions about Ukraine.
No, he’s not, as others have pointed out above. You guys are making dishonest attacks on him rather than addressing the issues he raises. It shows how thoroughly Washington trolls are forfeiting the debate.
In 1880, the ages of consent were set at 10 or 12 in most states, with the exception of Delaware where it was 7.
You need to cool your jets and take a pill if needed. I am not advocating anything. I am just saying perspective is something to might consider. Only a couple of generations ago things were much different. I say a couple of generations ago, because my Grandfather was born in 1870.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.