Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge orders attorneys in Trump documents case to get security clearance
The Center square ^ | 7/7/23

Posted on 07/07/2023 9:56:54 AM PDT by CFW

A federal judge ordered all the attorneys involved in former President Donald Trump's classified documents case to move forward with the process to get security clearance.

U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon told all the attorneys to "complete all outstanding applicant tasks required to obtain the requisite security clearances in this matter" by July 13.

Cannon, who was appointed by Trump, previously ordered all the attorneys to begin the process by reporting to the Litigation Security Group of the Department of Justice.

Trump pleaded not guilty to 37 counts that allege he kept sensitive military documents, shared them with people who didn't have security clearance, and tried to get around the government's efforts to get them back. He is charged with 31 counts of willful retention of national defense information along with conspiracy to obstruct justice, withholding a document or record, corruptly concealing a document or record, concealing a document in a federal investigation, scheme to conceal and false statements and representations.

(Excerpt) Read more at thecentersquare.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: aileencannon; attorneys; clearance; courts; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 07/07/2023 9:56:54 AM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CFW

Yet another contrived stumbling block meant to postpone or prevent a state of readiness for the defense.


2 posted on 07/07/2023 10:00:10 AM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Well, once they get clearances, their billing rate and future client prospects will go up. Though losing Trump’s case might not be good for their careers.


3 posted on 07/07/2023 10:00:42 AM PDT by Reno89519 (DeSantis 2024. Successful Governor, Honorable Veteran, Respectful, Respected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

I’m sure it’s a ploy to favor the deep state.. like more milage and closer to nov. ‘24


4 posted on 07/07/2023 10:02:02 AM PDT by Track9 (You are far too inquisitive not to be seduced…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Hunter has one. Get one like that.


5 posted on 07/07/2023 10:02:24 AM PDT by Libloather (Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

This is denying Trump the right to counsel of his choice.


6 posted on 07/07/2023 10:03:05 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Depending on the amount of past foreign travel, a top-secret background investigation can take 6 or more months - higher clearances may take longer. Does anyone find it odd that no elected officials need to pass any background checks?


7 posted on 07/07/2023 10:03:36 AM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iontheball

no elected officials need to pass any background checks?

***********

Voters said okay so no further checks needed.


8 posted on 07/07/2023 10:10:10 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CFW

When you get your security clearance, if you then reveal the contents of a classified document, I think you are subject to vastly increased penalties. I think this new requirement is to ensure the lawyers can’t talk about any of the evidence to the press.


9 posted on 07/07/2023 10:12:28 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (We live in a time where intelligent people are being silenced so stupid people won’t be offended)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

What lawyer hasn’t got something to hide from a security clearance backround check?

Good luck finding one cleaner than Caesar’s wife.

This will scare off anyone with anything to hide who doesn’t want their dirty laundry aired for all to see.


10 posted on 07/07/2023 10:14:49 AM PDT by mewzilla (We will never restore the republic if we don't first secure the ballot box.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Yeah, to get security clearance from the very entity that is attempting this rogue prosecution.

Everything at Mar A Lago was declassified and no clearance should be needed to see it. Period


11 posted on 07/07/2023 10:15:43 AM PDT by meyer (FBI = KGB for the DNC; IRS = Gestapo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW; All

Pathetic joke. Even so, maybe they shoulda done this months ago. Meanwhile, everyone and their Keystone Cops brothers have been fussing through dozens of unsecured boxes.


12 posted on 07/07/2023 10:27:05 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn’t common anymore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport

Voters said okay so no further checks needed.
_______________________
But when a voter wants to challenge one of the SOBs in court, the courts say the voter lacks ‘standing.’ The mother of all Gordian knots.


13 posted on 07/07/2023 10:34:49 AM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CFW

And who OK’s the security clearances? The same government officials who are prosecuting the defendant. Wonder what they will do?????


14 posted on 07/07/2023 10:36:37 AM PDT by vivenne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Clearances take months, sometimes over a year to get.

And what if his lawyer can’t get one?


15 posted on 07/07/2023 10:38:12 AM PDT by AAABEST ( NY/DC/CA media/political/military industrial complex DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

Not necessarily. This may be a good thing for Trump. Now the DOJ can’t hide anything in discovery by claiming it’s “classified”. They’ll have to show it to Trump’s attorneys once they get the TS-SCI.


16 posted on 07/07/2023 10:47:05 AM PDT by TallahasseeConservative (Isaiah 40:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CFW

This is old news .
Cannon a Trump judge ordered this .
The Pentagon files were highly classified and
she was startled by these Pentagon files .
These classified should not have been left in a FL Resort left open to the Public.
Trump former WH Cook/ Valet had no business moving these files.


17 posted on 07/07/2023 10:52:42 AM PDT by ncalburt ( Gop DC Globalists are the evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

Will the jury also need to do this? If I can’t see what the Gov Lawyers are claiming is so sensitive as a juror, I am acquitting.


18 posted on 07/07/2023 10:54:27 AM PDT by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Considering the materials were declassified as soon as Trump took possession of them, there is no need for anyone to have a security clearance. Cannon is not giving off good vibes in this case.


19 posted on 07/07/2023 11:07:32 AM PDT by usafa92 (Donald J. Trump, 45th and 47th President of the United States of America!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

First Mr. Off is prosecuting Trump aides and staff to get them t9o tutrn states evidence,

he calls Trumps attorneys to testify making them witnesses so they have to resign representing Trump,

and now Mr. Off insists that the lawyers for Trump get security clearance so as to get them knocked off the case for failure to obtain security clearance.

Mr. Off indicted TRump knowing that ALL of the documents he was going to use would have to be declassified. Now he is trying to keep the public from seeing theevodence he does noty have?

I’d say Mr. Off has no case.

Or he would not be committing these acts of prosecutorial misconduct.

Mr. Off is fishing for a case as he g0es along. This is a case that could be summarily dismissed.


20 posted on 07/07/2023 11:20:46 AM PDT by Candor7 (( Ask not for whom THE Trump trolls...He trolls for thee!)<img src=""width=500></img>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson