Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: randita

Did the judge in the Clinton sock drawer case draw that distinction?

No.


17 posted on 06/14/2023 4:39:40 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: odawg

The judge in the Clinton socks case dismissed the case because the redress the plaintiffs requested was not available. There was no decision on the merits of the case, so no precedent. Also, there was no claim from the plaintiffs that the tapes were agency records and not presidential records, so the issue wasn’t even addressed in the dicta of the opinion.


61 posted on 06/14/2023 5:42:30 PM PDT by CA Conservative (Free at last, free at last, thank God Almighty, I am free at last!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson