Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: odawg

The judge in the Clinton socks case dismissed the case because the redress the plaintiffs requested was not available. There was no decision on the merits of the case, so no precedent. Also, there was no claim from the plaintiffs that the tapes were agency records and not presidential records, so the issue wasn’t even addressed in the dicta of the opinion.


61 posted on 06/14/2023 5:42:30 PM PDT by CA Conservative (Free at last, free at last, thank God Almighty, I am free at last!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: CA Conservative

“There was no decision on the merits of the case, so no precedent.”

All the legal experts I have heard who discussed the case said the judge ruled, as Trump himself quoted, the records that a president has are his to keep. That was the decision on the merits of the case.

No, the issue of what type records was not brought up because that is an issue that McCarthy pulled out of his ass.


64 posted on 06/14/2023 5:50:37 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson