The first demonstrates the PCR "test" was not based on the Covid Virus because no isolated sample was available:
The CDC's own documentation dated 12/1/2020 says the PCR 'test' was developed without isolated samples because none was available:
*CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel - Instructions for Use (fda.gov)
Another version of this image is here:
The second excerpt features quotes from the highly informative FReeper Magic Bullet which I found highly informative - it details how China claimed to define Covid as an illness and more detail about complete lack of scientific integrity comprising the 'scamdemic'.
Post #1
The CDC only made a cell culture of ONE PATIENT, its a mix of many biological materials, not purified, ie never did a density gradient, its not a biologic isolation. BEI Resources sells many Sars Cov 2 so-called isolates, but they are unpurified cell cultures (I asked them, did you?). Neither Metagenomic study nor EM photos tells you what is really in a mix of soup.
The first case was ONE PATIENT from Wuhan, whose lung wash had a metagenome analysis. This is based on a few primers referencing a data base filling in most of the rest of the genome from a computer generated database RNA sequence, easily fudged, and sent to a gene bank that day with a lengthy complex paper by Zhang et al sent for publication in 2 days (really?) to Nature. Metagenomics are only supposed to be done only on well-characterized organisms, and the NOVEL corona virus is not one of these.
This gene accession number was then used as the template for the PCR (see FDA pcr manual that stated no isolates were available), and the Pfizer etc vaccines (see on line FOIA requests stating the vax was not based on the RNA of an isolated virus from a living patient). See, the head of the China CDC also said the problem is the virus has never been isolated.
So the test finds the same genome its based on, because thats how its programmed. Now, lets just vax 8 bil people based on this baseless data with mRNA made to a spike protein the computer made up, just coincidentlly also maps to a placenta protein.
There cant be an isolate to find or purify because then the whole narrative of the virus and later mutations, PCR, and Vaxes, would fall apart. Thats why there are many papers doing cell culture, metagenomic or PCR testing, and EM photos but NO DENSITY GRADIENT purification. Do you get whats happening?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Post #2
They say they have used metagenomics to sequence (by a co called Illumina) the sample of sludge (lung wash) they say they got from patient one in Wuhan. Nature paper:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2008-3
This paper at top says it was submitted on Jan 7th 2020 and was accepted on Jan 20th 2020-only 9 business days later.A later paper in March in Cell (published just to repeat the story of the first paper),
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32220310/
says:âÂÂFortunately, next-generation metatranscriptomic sequencing enabled us to obtain a complete viral genome from this patient on January 5, 2020âÂÂ.
Looking at the dates, they wrote up the Nature paper and submitted it and a gene accession no to a gene bank within 2 days. I personally suspect this paper is just written up and not real because this long paper must have been written in advance, and it is the first train car in train that all the others must follow because they made the gene sequence as the base.The entire PCR and then the Vax genome was determined from this ONE CASE based on the same gene accession no. The FDA said there were no isolates available in its PCR spec paper, the Chinese NIH Head said on video âÂÂwe did not isolate the virusâÂÂ, and Pfizer replied to FOIA requests the genome it uses as base for the Vax did not come from an isolate from an infected person? I omit the links here as they are easy to look up yourself.
To determine the exact pathogen, and where any lab would be able to INDEPENDENTLY reproduce isolation and confirm the pathogen claims and vax makers contents are appropriate, we need an isolate where the whole genome can be sequenced and the isolates can be shown to be from patients with similar pathology, and that these PURIFIED isolates can cause the same histologic changes in tissue cultures (preferably in humans or an animal similar to a human as study in humans is an ethical problem-not to mention that vaccinating the entire world with an experimental vaccine is a much bigger ethical problem), but there are no purified isolates....
Metagenomic problems:
1. Metagenomic sequencing of a mixed sample uses primers and then fills in the rest of the genome âÂÂin-silicoâ meaning in a computer program (i.e. on paper) based on a gene library (this is the part that can be fudged). Now you can get any sequence you like and set your PCR test based on the genes in that which may actually cross-react with other things (see links in my posts above).
2. Because of this, Metagenomic sequencing is only supposed to be done on organisms that have already been well characterized. How can a novel Corona be well characterized? Scroll to the image on the left about 1/3 way down from this top link:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/metagenomics
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41564-019-0637-9So now you can have labs reproduce cell cultures and define the pathogen based on a metagenome, and/or a PCR based on the metagenome now matched to the gene library you have yourself made up. If there were purified isolates on the market or reproduced independently then the whole story would crumble because the fudged part leads to faulty PCRs and vaxes that can have mRNA or DNA that leads to certain effects that would not be in a virus but could be in a genome you make in silico. Nobody makes isolates because there is no virus to make an isolate from, its just a positive PCR test or metagenome primers looking at a bunch of gook or cell-cultures you can buy that will lead you to the same place in the gene bank that you made up to begin with, and now you can make variants in-silico, and on and on.
BEI Resources makes and sells a few dozen covid âÂÂisolatesâÂÂ. I asked them if they isolated and purified the viruses, they replied the isolates are only cell culture lysates. Bacteria and fungi are usually killed off. Mix of viruses are left. If you use PCR on these you will of course find Covid because thatâÂÂs the only place on the map the pcr leads.
Maybe they have other corona’s in them for the E-M photos and to detect primers that lead to the gene bank for sars cov 2, this part is my conjecture.Reply from BEI Resources, biggest US maker of so called isolates:
âÂÂâÂÂâÂÂâÂÂâÂÂâÂÂâÂÂ
None of these products are really purified. Each of the virus strains are provided as cell lysate and supernatant. They definitely will not have been separated into density gradients and this is not something we would have tested for during the course of the normal QC and Authentication testing for these items.Walter Usener
BEI Resources
Customer/Technical Services
Administered by ATCC
10801 University Blvd
Manassas Virginia, 20110-2209
Email: Contact@BEIResources.org
Phone: 800-359-7370
âÂÂâÂÂâÂÂâÂÂâÂÂâÂÂâÂÂâÂÂâÂÂThey also told me they have no info on anyone who ever isolated and purified the virus from these cell cultures that only have inactivated viruses they say. Now you know that the word ISOLATE can be corrupted to any meaning you want.
Metagenomics is the bionic man of genetics, Part biology (but can still be faked), mostly made from silicon.
So supposedly 'everybody had isolated samples, all the time, everywhere, all day, everyday' but no one was actually using them, and researchers not on the inside can't get samples, ever. Still.
Excerpts for this post were taken from my debate with Minority Republican in the following thread (April 2021).
Dr. Andrew Kaufman refutes "isolation" of SARS-Cov-2; he does step-by-step analysis of a typical claim of isolation; there is no proof that the virus
Link to post from which I excerpted the above.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3953055/posts?page=29#29