Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DogByte6RER

If the cameras on public property, I guess the government, including the Navy, has a bit of a say over whether it shows things. That picture doesn’t show any thing beyond ships moving around out of context. If it’s a Camera on private property, that’s a whole different matter. Maybe the guy can go find himself a spot on private property, get permission to post it and be done with it.


5 posted on 05/09/2023 1:19:04 PM PDT by Reno89519 (Go Woke, Go Broke. Every Time Trump Says Something, I'm Closer to Anyone But Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Reno89519

“If the cameras on public property, I guess the government, including the Navy, has a bit of a say over whether it shows things.”

Nah, legally, anything on public property, or easily visible from public property, means there is no expectation of privacy. That’s why people can record you with their cell phone when you are out in public and saying “I didn’t give you permission to film” is irrelevant.


10 posted on 05/09/2023 1:57:30 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Reno89519

public means citizens own said national park.. its a 1st amendment issue, geez did the navy have an issue when the same web cams showed the ship that caught fire a few years ago??


16 posted on 05/09/2023 3:33:37 PM PDT by markman46 (engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson