Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reno89519

“If the cameras on public property, I guess the government, including the Navy, has a bit of a say over whether it shows things.”

Nah, legally, anything on public property, or easily visible from public property, means there is no expectation of privacy. That’s why people can record you with their cell phone when you are out in public and saying “I didn’t give you permission to film” is irrelevant.


10 posted on 05/09/2023 1:57:30 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman

The cameras were permanently mounted on NPS administered property. NPS is under no obligation to extend permission for fixed-mounted cameras in their parks.

A good lawyer might argue that past history constitutes a right by waiver but then you’re up against the Gubmint.


12 posted on 05/09/2023 2:14:04 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Freedom isn't free, liberty isn't liberal and you'll never find anything Right on the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson