Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChicagoConservative27

That’s also the eventual fate of the ridiculous proposed Communist regulations from CA energy utilities (taxing users based on their income, rather than on actual consumption).


4 posted on 04/17/2023 4:11:03 PM PDT by rfp1234 (E Porcibus Unum )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rfp1234

I think that story has been misreported. I could be wrong, but there is no possible way that energy costs will be capped at $15-$180 a month. People would run their air conditioners all day long! They’d do laundry during peak usage hours!
That proposed fee has got to be about what they charge for the access to energy, a separate line item on the bill apart from the price you pay for kWh usage.


9 posted on 04/17/2023 4:22:54 PM PDT by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: rfp1234
The income-dependent fees are in addition to paying for actual use
14 posted on 04/17/2023 4:43:31 PM PDT by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson