UPDATE: Biden Regime Confirms Commitment To “Legally-Binding” Agreement Which Will Surrender U.S. Pandemic Authority To Chinese-Backed World Health Organization “For Generations To Come”

International leaders are meeting this week in Geneva to consider a so-called “Zero Draft” of the agreement.

Read Also: New Research Points To Potential Effects Of “Lion’s Mane” On Promoting Nerve Growth, Improving Memory

As previously covered by The Gateway Pundit, the zero draft gives the WHO the power to declare and manage a global pandemic emergency.

Once a health emergency is declared every signatory, including the United States, must submit to the authority of the WHO. This includes caving to them on treatments, lockdowns and vaccine mandates along with government surveillance.

Even more chillingly, the Biden regime does not feel they need to submit this agreement for Senate approval because they are not calling it an official treaty despite it having the full force of one.

Thank you for referencing that article LoveMyFreedom.

"UPDATE: Biden Regime Confirms Commitment To “Legally-Binding” Agreement Which Will Surrender U.S. Pandemic Authority To Chinese-Backed World Health Organization “For Generations To Come”"

FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

From related thread...

Why aren't House majority, so-called “MAGA Republicans” screaming the following MAJOR constitutional problem with this treaty? (Hint: Trump's first round of primarying state and federal RINOs in 2020 was for practice imo.)

Regarding Biden Administration surrendering US sovereignty to non-elected foreign bureaucrats, the Supreme Court had clarified in Reid v. Covert that federal government power to make treaties cannot be used to bypass constitutional Article V amendment process to force US citizens to comply with foreign laws (my words), the medical edicts of WHO in this example.

"The obvious and decisive answer to this, of course, is that no agreement with a foreign nation can confer power on the Congress, or on any other branch of Government, which is free from the restraints of the Constitution." —Reid v. Covert, 1957.

So since the states have never expressly constitutionally given the post-17th Amendment ratification, unconstitutionally big federal government the specific power to dictate, regulate, tax and spend in the name of peacetime INTRAstate healthcare, not even to try to stop the spread of contagious diseases, corrupt Congress cannot use a treaty to force US citizens to comply with WHO edicts. (The misguided Roberts Court got Obamacare wrong imo.)

The following excerpts are from the writings of constitutional experts who had clarified that the federal government has no express constitutional authority to dictate intrastate healthcare policy.

"10th Amendment: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
"Many are the exercises of power reserved to the States wherein a uniformity of proceeding would be advantageous to all. Such are quarantines, health laws [emphasis added], regulations of the press, banking institutions, training militia, etc., etc." —Thomas Jefferson to James Sullivan, 1807.
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
"They form a portion of that immense mass of legislation, which embrace every thing in the territory of a state not surrendered to the general government. Inspection laws, quarantine laws, and health laws [emphasis added], as well as laws for regulating the internal commerce of a state, and others, which respect roads, fences, &c. are component parts of state legislation, resulting from the residuary powers of state sovereignty. No direct power over these is given to congress, and consequently they remain subject to state legislation, though they may be controlled by congress, when they interfere with their acknowledged powers." —Justice Joseph Story, Article I, Section 10, Clause 2, 1833.
“Inspection laws, quarantine laws, health laws of every description [emphasis added], as well as laws for regulating the internal commerce of a state and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c., are component parts of this mass.” —Justice Barbour, New York v. Miln., 1837.
"From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]." —United States v. Butler, 1936.

Below are excerpts from Supreme Court case opinions and congressional record that don't mention quarantine, but support the constitutional reality that healthcare issues, politically correct (imo) mandating of masks argued to slow spread of contagious diseases for example, is a state power issue, not the business of the feds.

”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphases added]” —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
From the congressional record, clarification by Rep. John Bingham, the main author of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment:
”Simply this, that the care of the property, the liberty, and the life of the citizen, under the solemn sanction of an oath imposed by your Constitution, is in the States and not in the federal government [emphases added]. I have sought to effect no change in that respect in the Constitution of the country.” —John Bingham, Congressional. Globe. 1866, page 1292 (see top half of third column)
“Direct control of medical practice in the states is obviously beyond the power of Congress [emphases added].” –Linder v. United States, 1925.

Patriots, the bottom line is this imo. What is your threshold of “pain” for peacefully stopping unconstitutionally big state and federal governments controlled by bully, constitutionally undefined political parties, from oppressing the people under their boots?

The inevitable remedy for ongoing, post-17A ratification, corrupt political party treason (imo)...

All MAGA patriots need to wake up their RINO federal and state lawmakers by making the following clear to them.

If they don’t publicly support either a resolution, or a Constitutional Convention, to effectively "secede" ALL the states from the unconstitutionally big federal government by amending the Constitution to repeal the 16th (direct taxes) and 17th (popular voting for federal senators) Amendments (16&17A), doing so before the primary elections in 2024, that YOU will primary them.

If the proposed amendment was limited strictly to repealing 16&17A, relatively little or ideally no discussion would be needed before ratification of the amendment imo.

With 16&17A out of the way, my hope is that Trump 47 becomes the FIRST president of a truly constitutionally limited power federal government.

In the meanwhile, I'm not holding my breath for significant MAGA legislation to appear in the first 100 days of new term for what may still prove to be another RINO-controlled House.

Again, Trump will hopefully do another round of primarying RINOs for 2024 elections.

Government is ungovernable. ABOLISH!

In order to take back control of the extent of the world you do have a say so over, repatriate to the common law land and soil jurisdiction of your birth nation state. For example:

Declaration of Political Status.

I the living man, (your name here), affirm and declare that I have returned to my lawful birthright political status as a (Coloradan or other appropriate declared birth state), and I claim my exemptions as stated in Federal Code 8 USC 1101 (a) 21.

This I declare and affirm under penalty of perjury under the public law of The United States of America.

By: script signature in blue ink from center of document to right (your name here) copyright red ink seal.

Without Prejudice.

MANDATORY NOTICE.

Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act Sections 1605 and 1607 NOTICE OF LIABILITY: 18 USC 2333, 18 USC 1341 and 1342.

This MANDATORY NOTICE is provided to all Territorial United States District and State and County Courts, their officers, clerks, bailiffs, sheriffs, deputies, and employees and all Municipal Appointees including their DISTRICT, STATE, and COUNTY COURTS, their OFFICERS and EMPLOYEES: The vessels doing business as (your name here) together with all derivatives and permutations and punctuations and orderings of these names, are not acting in any federal territorial or municipal capacity and have not knowingly or willingly acted in any such capacity since the day of nativity: (declared birth month, day, year). All vessels are duly claimed by the Holder in Due Course and held under published Common Law Copyright since declared birth month, day, year.

These vessels are publishing MANDATORY NOTICE that they are Foreign Sovereigns from declared birth state a member State of The United States of America. This is your MANDATORY NOTICE that these above-named vessels are owed all material rights, duties, exemptions, insurances, treaties, bonds, agreements, and guarantees including indemnity and full faith and credit; you are also hereby provided with MANDATORY NOTICE that these vessels are not subject to Territorial or Municipal United States law and are owed The Law of Peace, Department of the Army Pamphlet 27-161-1, from all Territorial and Municipal Officers and employees who otherwise have no permission to approach or address them. Any harm resulting from trespass upon these vessels or the use of fictitious names or titles related to them shall be subject to full commercial liability and penalties: 18 USC 2333, 18 USC 1341 and 1342.

So said, so signed, and so sealed this declared day of declared month in the year declared year.

Instructions here:

https://tasa.americanstatenationals.org/chart-your-course/

ACT OF EXPATRIATION AND OATH OF ALLEGIANCE.

Whereas (all caps your name here) is a naturalized “citizen of the United States” under the Diversity Clause of the Constitution(s) and is the age of majority and whereas such citizenship was never desired nor intended nor willingly nor voluntarily entered into under conditions of full disclosure (all caps your name here) willingly and purposefully renounces all citizenship or other assumed political status related to the United States defined as “the territories and District of Columbia” (13 Stat. 223, 306, ch. 173, sec. 182, June 30, 1864) and its government, a corporation doing business variously as the (all caps) UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Municipal Corporation of the District of Columbia, etc. formed under the Act of 1877,

and does repatriate to the land of HIS birth known as (declared birth state) and does freely affirm HIS allegiance to the same actual and organic state of the Union and does accept and reclaim HIS true Nationality as an American State National and an American State Vessel in all international trade and commerce owned and operated by (your name here), declared street address, declared town, declared state Postal Code Extension.

This action, I validate, certify, Witness and affirm this (numbered) day of (declared month), (declared year):

By: (script signature in blue ink from center of document to right (your name here) copyright red ink seal.

Every president of the United States has recited the oath of office as the official start of their presidency.

The oath is found in Article II of the Constitution. It contains 35 words and goes as follows:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

The vice president-elect takes a slightly different, longer oath, which is also utilized for members of Congress and some other federal employees:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God."

Note that POTUS does NOT say anything about the ENEMIES of our country.

However, the VICE president does. So unless Joe has disavowed his previous OATH; it is STILL binding.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

CHOICE?