Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Activist investors sue Shell for not fighting 'climate crisis'; lawsuit demands company change business model to 'cleaner energy'
The Blaze ^ | 2/9/23

Posted on 02/09/2023 11:16:05 AM PST by Impala64ssa

A group of institutional investors are suing energy and gas giant Shell for allegedly not properly preparing to shift away from fossil fuels, as reported by Reuters.

Client Earth, investors and activist group in Shell, are taking the board of directors to court over allegations that they are harming the company's future by not properly shifting toward green energy. The environmentalists say it is the company's duty to shift away from fossil fuels and pivot in order to fight the "climate crisis."

"Shell’s Board is legally required to manage risks to the company that could harm its future success, and the climate crisis presents the biggest risk of them all," Client Earth says in a statement regarding the lawsuit.

"Ensuring the company stays competitive in the energy markets of the future, as countries and customers worldwide choose cheaper, cleaner energy, means Shell needs to move away from fossil fuels towards an alternative business model," the group continues, adding that "we’re arguing that the plan Shell’s Board currently has for making that shift is simply unreasonable."

Shell just shared news of record profits a week before, taking in $40 billion due to price increases stemming from the Russian and Ukrainian war.

Shell rejected allegations made by the activist group, claiming its climate targets are on track and in compliance with the law and with shareholders.

"ClientEarth's attempt ... to overturn the board's policy as approved by our shareholders has no merit," a spokesperson said.

Shell plans to reduce its emissions by 20% by 2030, 45% by 2035, and 100% by 2050 from 2016 levels.

However, the plaintiffs claim is that Shell is failing to reduce emissions, which "threatens efforts to protect the planet, further increasing the risk to the company."

"The future consequences of Shell’s flawed climate plans could cause the company’s value to plummet, costing jobs and running the risk of shareholders and investors losing significant amounts of money, including people’s pension funds," the statement concludes.

A group of pension funds have written letters support of the claims against Shell, including "London CIV and Nest, Swedish pension fund AP3, French asset manager Sanso IS, Degroof Petercam Asset Management in Belgium and Denmark's Danske Bank Asset Management and Danica Pension and AP Pension."

The group owns a relatively small portion of Shell's company, making up about 12 million out of 7 billion shares.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: fossilfuels; shelloil; treehuggers
An uncorrupt, FTC would be keeping their eyes on these "activist investors", paying particular attention to how much short selling, covered put buying, etc is occurring within these groups. Pretending to care about our "fragile planet" for fun and profit
1 posted on 02/09/2023 11:16:05 AM PST by Impala64ssa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

Shell should have their lawyers respond with a letter telling the investors they first need to burn all the money they made from their stock to show they are serious about change.


2 posted on 02/09/2023 11:19:37 AM PST by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

The right needs to fight as hard and as dirty as the left. Sue companies for having a business model that increases prices that hurts the minorities and the children.

But we are too fat and lazy to fight.


3 posted on 02/09/2023 11:22:04 AM PST by Chgogal (Welcome to Fuhrer Biden's Weaponized Fascist Banana Republic! It's the road to hell..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

This is a shakedown racket, not unlike that negro poverty pimp Al Sharpton runs.


4 posted on 02/09/2023 11:30:19 AM PST by ConservativeInPA (Stupidly is a moral problem, not an intellectual problem. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

Did Shell divest themselves of all of the ‘green’ power production they invested in during the latter 90s on?

They and other oil companies tried to get ahead of the game into newer technologies, wind and solar farms, and those largely flopped because none of that was ready.


5 posted on 02/09/2023 11:35:48 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa
again with the "climate crisis"


6 posted on 02/09/2023 11:37:39 AM PST by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shotgun

You know they are probably leftist radicals who bought a few shares of stock each in order to sue and mess up the company. Heard this tactic from a Dem politician as his go to strategy. Ugh.


7 posted on 02/09/2023 11:38:44 AM PST by vivenne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

There is no such thing as “cleaner energy” it’s a myth


8 posted on 02/09/2023 11:40:03 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

Such insanity


9 posted on 02/09/2023 11:42:35 AM PST by Nifster ( EI see puppy dogs in the clouds )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

Has the EPA declared CO2 toxic?


10 posted on 02/09/2023 11:44:37 AM PST by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

The kooks aren’t satisfied that there are hundreds of “green” energy companies from small mom & pops to huge giants like GE, Siemens and Vesta doing the “green” work. No, they won’t be satisfied until they have put conventional fossil fuel companies completely out of business.

Or they are looking for an easy payday.


11 posted on 02/09/2023 11:49:38 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (Once you get people to believe that a plural pronoun is singular, they'll believe anything - nicollo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vivenne

Some nuns did this to DuPont over napalm in the 1960’s. Pure theater.


12 posted on 02/09/2023 11:52:02 AM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

I guess these “activists” do not know who is the majority shareholder is and who controls the BoD. Its the House of Saud. I represented a dealer a few years back who sued Shell for underhandedly running him out of the business. They settled with him for $600k.


13 posted on 02/09/2023 11:58:15 AM PST by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpp113

Saudi Aramco, LLC is the Saud Royal family.


14 posted on 02/09/2023 11:59:16 AM PST by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

Royal Dutch Shell

I used to own their stock but the government always snatched some of my dividends so I dumped them

Now they’re at the mercy of the euroturds


15 posted on 02/09/2023 12:13:15 PM PST by NWFree (Somebody has to say it 🤪)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sasquatch

I hope not. I wouldn’t put it past the Biden EPA to do so, however.


16 posted on 02/09/2023 12:48:03 PM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

Activist investors receive memo from Shell: Our business our name here’s you finger sign.


17 posted on 02/09/2023 1:33:36 PM PST by Vaduz (LAWYERS )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa
Damn the BEE!!!

18 posted on 02/09/2023 2:39:07 PM PST by Chode (there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. #FJB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

How do you sue make believe?


19 posted on 02/09/2023 3:04:15 PM PST by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson