Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China’s Growing Nuclear Arsenal Is A Bigger Threat Than A Spy Balloon, And The U.S. Helped Make It Possible
The Federalist ^ | 02/09/2023 | Helen Raleigh

Posted on 02/09/2023 8:02:09 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Hopefully, the Chinese spy balloon incident will become a turning point, a wake-up call for a divided nation.

The sight of a Chinese spy balloon last week has forced many Americans to confront the security threat the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) poses to America’s homeland. Unfortunately, the CCP possesses something far scarier and deadlier than balloons: a rapidly growing stockpile of nuclear weapons.

Measured by the number of nuclear warheads, China has at least 350 as of June 2022, far less than Russia’s 5,977 and the United States’ 5,428. Still, the speed at which China is building up its nuclear arsenal is worrisome.

Last year, a U.S. Department of Defense report predicted that “China would field a stockpile of about 1,500 warheads by 2035.” At the end of last month, right before the balloon became national news, the Pentagon told Congress, “The number of land-based fixed and mobile ICBM launchers in China exceeds the number of ICBM launchers in the United States.” ICBM stands for intercontinental ballistic missile, which can reach a target more than 5,000 miles away. Whether by coincidence or design, during the balloon’s week-long “tour” in the U.S., it flew by Montana, where more than 100 U.S. ICBMs are stationed.

One explanation of the CCP’s motive for rapidly growing its nuclear weapons stockpiles is that the CCP has witnessed how Russia’s possession of nuclear weapons has deterred Western democracies and the United States from directly engaging in a military conflict between Russia and Ukraine. Should China’s People’s Liberation Army invade Taiwan, the CCP probably hopes its growing nuclear weapon stockpiles will also deter Taiwan’s allies, including Japan and the U.S., from coming to Taiwan’s rescue. Undoubtedly, China’s nuclear weapons threaten the security of the U.S. and its allies in Asia.

What’s even more depressing is that the U.S. helped China build its nuclear weapons. The Wall Street Journal reported that the China Academy of Engineering Physics (CAEP), the nation’s top nuclear weapons research institute, has been able to acquire U.S.-made advanced semiconductor chips on the open market in the last two years to assist Chinese scientists’ research, which can have applications to China’s nuclear weapons program.

This revelation shocked many because the U.S. government has put such advanced semiconductor chips on its export restriction list and blacklisted CAEP on an entity list, aiming to prevent American firms from selling semiconductor chips to CAEP. The Bureau of Industry and Security, a U.S. Department of Commerce division, has administered most of the export controls for decades. Yet Georgetown University’s Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET) analysis found that U.S. semiconductor exports to China increased between 2014 and 2018. The CSET’s research and the WSJ report prove that the Bureau of Industry and Security needs to administer and enforce export controls more effectively.

Equally depressing is the Biden administration’s blind faith in denuclearization through an arms-control treaty. President Obama signed an arms control pact, known as a New START, with Russia in 2010. The treaty limits the United States and Russia to deploying no more than 1,550 strategic nuclear warheads each.

New START has many flaws, one of which is that it doesn’t address how to limit Russia’s capacity to pursue other nuclear weapons outside the treaty. Predictably, Russia has been taking advantage of this loophole by modernizing its existing nuclear weapons and developing new ones while claiming compliance with the treaty.

Rather than addressing New START’s many defects, President Biden extended it to another five years on his second day in office. His administration tried to cap China’s nuclear weapon buildup by bringing it into New START’s framework, and China adamantly refused. 

A few days ago, Russia reportedly breached the New START treaty by refusing to allow on-site inspection of its nuclear arsenal. The treaty risks falling apart right in front of our eyes. 

While the New START treaty has failed to limit Russia’s nuclear weapon buildup, according to Rep. Mike Rogers, a Republican from Alabama who chairs the House Armed Services Committee, it “has inhibited the U.S. from building up its arsenal to deter Russia and China.”

The Biden administration’s approach risks putting America in a perilous situation. There is no ending in sight of the Russia-Ukraine war, and the Biden administration has gotten the U.S. more profoundly involved with the conflict by throwing enormous military resources into Ukraine “every two weeks, like clockwork,” according to John Kirby, the spokesman for the Pentagon.

Suppose China’s Xi Jinping decides to invade Taiwan as soon as 2025, as predicted by four-star Air Force Gen. Mike Minihan. In that case, the United States may be forced to involve itself in two military conflicts against two adversaries backed by nuclear weapons, and it will be a nightmare scenario.

Hopefully, the Chinese spy balloon incident will become a turning point, a wake-up call for a divided nation. We must stop infighting and self-imposed decline and destruction. Instead, we ought to focus our energy and resources on how to protect our homeland. 


Helen Raleigh, CFA, is an American entrepreneur, writer, and speaker. She's a senior contributor at The Federalist. Her writings appear in other national media, including The Wall Street Journal and Fox News.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: brics; ccp; china; clintoncrimefamily; clintonlegacy; demsunitedagainstusa; demsunitedforukraine; nukes; sco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 02/09/2023 8:02:09 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Not “the US”....Libs forcing manufacturing out of the country, and selling tech to the Red Chinese.


2 posted on 02/09/2023 8:08:08 AM PST by gundog (It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“China’s Growing Nuclear Arsenal Is A Bigger Threat Than A Spy Balloon, And The U.S. Helped Make It Possible”

But China doesn’t have Putin, so they CANNOT be threat to all things Western. So why worry about them?


3 posted on 02/09/2023 8:12:12 AM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

so how much of their country are they contaminating ?


4 posted on 02/09/2023 8:13:38 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

The CCP doesn’t care as long as other countries are just as miserable and more than they are. See [Pandemic, Coronavirus ] for the most recent example.


5 posted on 02/09/2023 8:19:20 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

Think Loral. Bottom line is we created a monster. The US never needed China. Corporate America did. Lured us in with a billion potential customers and took the jobs instead. They’re pretty smart.


6 posted on 02/09/2023 8:19:49 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BobL

Yea, but the way we are meddling, China and Putin may decide to “pool their resources”. But seeing as we are the world’s superpower, they would not dare.


7 posted on 02/09/2023 8:19:50 AM PST by CodeJockey ("The duty of a true Patriot is to protect his country from its government.” –Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CodeJockey

“Yea, but the way we are meddling, China and Putin may decide to “pool their resources”. But seeing as we are the world’s superpower, they would not dare.”

Great point! And thanks for reminding me - I had forgotten that we had declared ourselves as the world’s ONLY superpower 30+ years ago, and therefore we are INVINCIBLE and even Russian/Chinese nukes will disintegrate before hitting US cities.

So, no need to worry - we’re safe! We’re so safe that we can replace our soldiers with Drag Queens!


8 posted on 02/09/2023 8:27:55 AM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We have to stop using China as a trading partner, it’s all take take take from them, with no reciprocation. And what they don’t acquire legally, they steal.
Has to stop.


9 posted on 02/09/2023 8:33:14 AM PST by telescope115 (My feet are on the ground, and my head is in the stars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gundog

What “libs” forced manufacturing out of the country?

Libs like G H W Bush and family? The Rockefellers? The Koch family? Buffett? All of Wall Street?

The transfer of factories to China was advocated as early as 1972 to break the power of the Unions in the US. Which party do you think was behind that?


10 posted on 02/09/2023 8:34:05 AM PST by Regulator (It's fraud, Jiim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Nuclear Arsenal Is A Bigger Threat Than A Spy Balloon”

Well, in one way, it is not, since the nuclear arsenal will never be used, and the spy balloon already has been used.


11 posted on 02/09/2023 8:34:17 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
“ Well, in one way, it is not, since the nuclear arsenal will never be used…”

Why do you think that? I am curious.

12 posted on 02/09/2023 8:39:00 AM PST by untenured
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

Throw Nixon in there, too.


13 posted on 02/09/2023 8:39:09 AM PST by gundog (It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Never forget that YOUR federal gov sold out your manufacturing to make a country of 3rd world peasants your near-peer and greatest opponent…. Then, ~25 years after that, they gave them a bunch of your missile tech.


14 posted on 02/09/2023 8:40:38 AM PST by Levy78 (Reject modernity, embrace tradition. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We should nuke china now. I’m not saying our hair won’t get mussed...


15 posted on 02/09/2023 8:40:57 AM PST by Sirius Lee (They intend to murder us. Prep if you want to live and live like you are prepping for eternal life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gundog

Yeah, sorry, how could I forget him and Kissinger selling us out?

Ostensibly to counter the USSR but the covert plan was to do the bidding of the emerging multi-nationals who needed to cut mfg costs.


16 posted on 02/09/2023 8:42:06 AM PST by Regulator (It's fraud, Jiim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Yes. Local. What was the name of that traitor who sold us out?


17 posted on 02/09/2023 8:54:51 AM PST by CletusVanDamme (The breaking point will be reached soon. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CletusVanDamme

*Loral.


18 posted on 02/09/2023 8:55:20 AM PST by CletusVanDamme (The breaking point will be reached soon. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“The capitalists will sell us the rope that we will hang them with.”


19 posted on 02/09/2023 8:56:52 AM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: untenured

“Why do you think that?”

Because a nuclear arsenal becomes completely worthless the second you use it, in the modern world. It only has value if you don’t use it, but everyone thinks you are willing to.


20 posted on 02/09/2023 8:57:29 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson