Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Rains Could Have Supplied State’s Needs for 10 Years — If Stored
Breitbart ^ | 01-19-2023 | JOEL B. POLLAK

Posted on 01/19/2023 12:39:41 PM PST by ChicagoConservative27

The rain that fell on California in recent weeks could have supplied the state’s water needs for 10 years — if it had been captured and stored. Unfortunately, most of the water is being left to drain to the Pacific Ocean.

California received some 32 trillion gallons of water in three weeks of “atmospheric river” storms across the state, according to Fox News. In 2014, the state used 42 million acre feet, or about 1.4 trillion gallons, annually, according to the Desert Sun, citing the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (A more recent figure from USGS suggests the state withdraws up to 28,800 gallons per day, or about 1 trillion per year, from the environment.)

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: california; rains; supplied; years
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
California is too worried about who used what bathroom and illegals coming over the border for free BEEP. California is full of stupid.
1 posted on 01/19/2023 12:39:41 PM PST by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

“California is too worried about who used what bathroom and illegals coming over the border for free BEEP. California is full of stupid.”

But more importantly, they are worried about trucks that run on combustion engines picking up goods at the docks, leaving ships berthed in the harbor for weeks on end.


2 posted on 01/19/2023 12:43:09 PM PST by EQAndyBuzz (“Racist” is the new “Nazi”.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Every farmer says at some point during the growing season, “If only ...”


3 posted on 01/19/2023 12:44:54 PM PST by gloryblaze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Maybe they were afraid of impacting the Delta Smelt, or whatever insignificant animal is the endangered-of-the-week at the moment?


4 posted on 01/19/2023 12:45:36 PM PST by Little Pig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

We’ll get more water in the spring when the snows melt. Whether we capture and store it is an entirely different question. It isn’t something I’ve studied in depth but I have no doubt that water resource management is screwy. They are busy tearing down dams and releasing water to save fish and I don’t think we have any new aqueducts or expansion projects for the existing reservoirs.


5 posted on 01/19/2023 12:47:38 PM PST by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

......putting Liberals in charge of a whole state is like putting a child in the pilot seat of a deceased pilot of an airbus loaded with 500 people midway across the Atlantic...................


6 posted on 01/19/2023 12:49:13 PM PST by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

the state withdraws up to 28,800 gallons per day, or about 1 trillion per year, from the environment

``````````````````````````````````````

Is that “woke” math??

28,800 X 365 = 10,512,000


7 posted on 01/19/2023 12:49:58 PM PST by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

10 million
A trillion

My, aren’t you nit-picky today!


8 posted on 01/19/2023 12:53:59 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (Once you get people to believe that a plural pronoun is singular, they'll believe anything - nicollo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Democrats are organized criminals disguised as a political party and their primary
weapons are ineptitude and gross mismanagement as demonstrated at both the
state and federal levels.
9 posted on 01/19/2023 12:55:45 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Even if the reservoirs are filled and overflowing like in 2019, within 2 years they will be drained just like Newscum did in 2020-2021. There is no way in hell they will give up the power to Control that the Permanent Emergency Drought Orders give them.


10 posted on 01/19/2023 12:57:24 PM PST by eyeamok (founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

The manufactured crisis must be perpetuated.


11 posted on 01/19/2023 12:58:06 PM PST by Openurmind (The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

But how is California supposed to store all of this water? You can’t possibly mean using dams especially constructed for this and other purposes? What about the Indians, the salmon and the delta smelt? C’mon man! Dams are bad. The electricity they generate is bad and flood control they provide is bad as well since ‘communities of color’ are more affected by floods than ‘communities of non-color’.
/s


12 posted on 01/19/2023 1:04:32 PM PST by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Joel Pollak should stick to politics. He’s way out of his lane here.

It’s beyond amateurish for Breitbart to post this kind of crap without getting a single quote from a real hydrologist who knows how water resource management works.

13 posted on 01/19/2023 1:09:16 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("It's midnight in Manhattan. This is no time to get cute; it's a mad dog's promenade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

If they build a 500’ tall dam at the Carquinez Strait then they can turn the entire central valley into a reservoir for Los Angeles and San Francisco.

Bonus: It’ll flood out Sacramento!


14 posted on 01/19/2023 1:17:08 PM PST by MeganC (There is nothing feminine about feminism. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Politicians are all about bribes and kickbacks. They do not care about the drought or building dams or desalination plants. If they can get a bribe for any reason then that’s all that matters to them.


15 posted on 01/19/2023 1:20:19 PM PST by George J. Jetso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

“if it had been captured and stored. “

A stupid article for stupid people.

If all the water is captured and stored, all the rivers will be dust.

And NOBODY wants that, left...right...or stupid green.

Well, except for COMMERCIAL, CORPORATE FARMS AND THE LACKYS IN THEIR EMPLOY...LIKE JOEL B. POLLAK .


16 posted on 01/19/2023 1:28:10 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

See my #16


17 posted on 01/19/2023 1:30:30 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Thank you. It is absolutely true that the green leaders don’t care a whit about water storage. But the 32 T gallons and ten years’ use is just plain silly. There is no way to store the water that falls on what I’ll call for lack of a better term the narrow coastal plain. Likewise the lands around SF Bay. The Central Valley,
20,000 square miles, is essentially flat and much quite low: Sacramento is 30 feet above sea level; Stockton 13. Much of the desert is very flat. How do you store water on what is essentially a table top?

The central point could have been made without resorting to silly hyperbole.


18 posted on 01/19/2023 1:31:24 PM PST by j.havenfarm (22 years on Free Republic, 12/10/22! more then 6500 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine

Probably a good bit of that storage would also have worked its way into the ground aquifers.


19 posted on 01/19/2023 1:46:13 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Exactly.

It's like telling people they should put a 1,000-gallon gasoline storage tank in their yards so they can pay a discounted price for 1-2 years worth of gasoline at a time.

20 posted on 01/19/2023 2:31:56 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("It's midnight in Manhattan. This is no time to get cute; it's a mad dog's promenade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson