Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House GOP divided over whether McCarthy should give in on ‘motion to vacate’ (Eyepatch McCain VERY upset!)
cnn.com ^ | 12/13/22 | Lauren Fox, Melanie Zanona, Kristin Wilson and Sarah Fortinsky

Posted on 12/14/2022 5:47:42 AM PST by cotton1706

The House Republican Conference is still entrenched in an internal war over whether to reinstate an arcane rule that would empower any member to bring up a vote to oust a speaker at any time.

The bitter divide is only heating up and has emerged center stage in House GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy’s quest for 218 votes to win the position. For McCarthy’s backers, the so-called motion to vacate is seen as little more than a promise of hostage taking, a tool that could be used by the right flank to hamstring McCarthy’s ability to lead the conference and effectively govern.

“There’s a reason [the motion to vacate] already got debated. You can’t govern with a gun to your head and that is what they are asking for. It makes us highly unstable, and it lays out the potential too for Democrats to take advantage of this and create absolute chaos,” Rep. Dan Crenshaw, a Texas Republican, told CNN. “There is a reason people are against it. You can scream the word accountability all you want … in the end it’s just a path to chaos, not stability, and we are going to have to be very united and very stable if we are going to govern properly. “

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; electionz; electionzzz; elekchunz; mccarthy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Four people wrote this story!

More than one author is the tell-tale sign that this issue is REALLY important to the media Oligarchy.

1 posted on 12/14/2022 5:47:42 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

The motion to vacate is nothing more that allowing the House to have the ability to choose another speaker during the session or during the congress if it feels the need to.

But the Ruling Oligarchy does not like checks to its power (they see them as “guns to their head”)


2 posted on 12/14/2022 5:50:07 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Since CNN is advocating against this (and their love of the Republicans), I think it is a great idea!


3 posted on 12/14/2022 5:56:35 AM PST by silent majority rising
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

The issue in other language is called “a vote of confidence”

Does the current Speaker have the confidence of the majority party?


4 posted on 12/14/2022 5:59:29 AM PST by bert ( (KWE. NP. N.C. +12) Juneteenth is inequality day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
Rep. Dan Crenshaw, a Texas Republican, told CNN. “There is a reason people are against it. You can scream the word accountability all you want … in the end it’s just a path to chaos, not stability, and we are going to have to be very united and very stable if we are going to govern properly. “

You are not there to govern. You are there to SERVE!

5 posted on 12/14/2022 5:59:54 AM PST by OSHA (The Constitiution is a small box carefully crafted to keep government in. We let it escape.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

The motion to vacate is nothing more that allowing the House to have the ability to choose another speaker during the session or during the congress if it feels the need to.

——————————————————

This would be a primary motion, Therefore .democrats could play havoc by constantly bringing the motion and stopping all business until the motion is addressed. Then we know if .democrats regain majority they would eliminate the rule so Republicans could not challenge their speaker.


6 posted on 12/14/2022 6:05:48 AM PST by georgiarat (We must be free not because we claim freedom, but because we practice it. William Faulkner )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: silent majority rising

“Since CNN is advocating against this (and their love of the Republicans), I think it is a great idea!”

When Mark Meadows, in the summer of 2015, submitted the privileged motion to vacate the chair just before the summer recess, it was a beautiful thing!

And it PISSED the Establishment off like nothing else.

The motion sat out there stewing for the rest of the summer and in September, John Boehner announced he was resigning as speaker.

A powerful oligarch was removed. And they didn’t like that at all!


7 posted on 12/14/2022 6:06:38 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

“The motion to vacate is nothing more that allowing the House to have the ability to choose another speaker during the session or during the congress if it feels the need to.”

The Rule is CRITICAL to making sure that McCarthy isn’t another Paul Ryan, who looked at his job as nothing more than protecting Democrats. Without it, as you imply, McCarthy can promise ANYTHING (like the West did with Minsk 2) to get elected Speaker, and then TOTALLY IGNORE everything he promised.

And the rule is far from “Arcane” in that it was used to get rid of Boehner in 2015. (didn’t do us no good, but that’s another story)


8 posted on 12/14/2022 6:09:02 AM PST by BobL (By the way, low tonight in Latvia: 11 degrees, brrrr!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: georgiarat

“This would be a primary motion, Therefore .democrats could play havoc by constantly bringing the motion and stopping all business until the motion is addressed. Then we know if .democrats regain majority they would eliminate the rule so Republicans could not challenge their speaker.”

The Democrats have already removed the rule in the last congresses, and it should be restored.

The House sets the rules at the beginning of the Congress, so they could not change it mid-congress.

We can’t go through life worrying what the Democrats might do. The motion to vacate the chair is a legislative check to oligarchic power and should be restored.


9 posted on 12/14/2022 6:10:25 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

It takes 4 journalism majors who are dumb as a box of rocks to understand what a “motion to vacate” is.

It is similar to the UK’s parlimentary rules where a vote of no confidence can be taken at any time. And since I have no confidence in McCarthy, I think it is a great idea. Unless we get racist Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) in his place. :(


10 posted on 12/14/2022 6:19:36 AM PST by Kaiser8408a (z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706; All

Govern properly? I thought you were only 1 half of 1 third. That talking point seems to have disappeared. Now it’s on you to “govern properly”. If the people didn’t want chaos then you would have a stronger mandate. Let’s try a little chaos, governing properly leads to trillion dollar deficits, prioritizing gay marriage, sending jobs overseas, uncontrolled immigration and unlimited money to Ukraine. The more I think of it, maybe a little chaos is called for.


11 posted on 12/14/2022 6:29:48 AM PST by wiseprince (Me,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OSHA

Rep. Dan Crenshaw, a Texas Republican is a WEF Devotee, WEF Stooge, WEF Butt-Boy. Pick your description. HE believes HE is there to GOVERN. HE did not misspeak.

Crenshaw and the WEF want to be WORLD RULERS and believe they DESERVE to be!!!!


12 posted on 12/14/2022 6:31:01 AM PST by OHPatriot (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

a tool that should be used by the right flank to unstring McCarthy’s refusal to lead the conference and effectively govern by forcing him to represent his constituents.

*/

They work for US

Not the other way around.


13 posted on 12/14/2022 6:38:48 AM PST by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OSHA

Amen!


14 posted on 12/14/2022 6:40:46 AM PST by pghbjugop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
"You can’t govern with a gun to your head...You can scream the word accountability all you want … in the end it’s just a path to chaos, not stability, and we are going to have to be very united and very stable if we are going to govern properly. “

Typical WEFpedoprattle. Your job in Congress is not to govern. It is to represent the citizens of your district. And yes, hold government accountable to the people you represent. This asshat needs to be primaried out, stat!

15 posted on 12/14/2022 6:59:57 AM PST by Sirius Lee (They intend to murder us. Prep if you want to live and live like you are prepping for eternal life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wiseprince

“I thought you were only 1 half of 1 third. That talking point seems to have disappeared.”

Yes, you’re correct. That excuse vanished quite quickly and conveniently.


16 posted on 12/14/2022 7:02:34 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Republicans are like a bunch of children on the playground arguing over whether to use a 30-inch circle or a 32-inch circle to play a game of marbles. In the meantime...a Democrat gang from another school, armed with rocks and baseball bats, is sneaking up behind the Pubbies...getting ready to bash heads and steal lunch money.


17 posted on 12/14/2022 7:29:15 AM PST by moovova ("The NEXT election is the most important election of our lifetimes!“ LOL...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
When Mark Meadows, in the summer of 2015, submitted the privileged motion to vacate the chair just before the summer recess, it was a beautiful thing!

It brought us Paul Ryan! Hell yeah!

18 posted on 12/14/2022 7:37:13 AM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: moovova

The “..30-inch circle or a 32-inch circle ...” is another way of describing the Republican obsession with purity!

Purity first before power so the result is the Republicans rarely get power. Rats power first, power second, power, power, power, maybe if they get bored, they’ll talk about purity but well after power!


19 posted on 12/14/2022 7:40:48 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

The problem with McCarthy is that he has been more focused over the past 6-12 months on securing HIS speakership than getting conservative candidates to win elections. If he won another 10-15 seats this probably wouldn’t be happening.


20 posted on 12/14/2022 7:43:59 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson