Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christopher Columbus ... crusader?
Hotair.com ^ | 10-12-22 | The Stream

Posted on 10/12/2022 7:10:26 PM PDT by DeweyCA

While all this is true, Columbus stands for and is a reminder of something else that is now little known if not completely (and intentionally) forgotten: he was, first and foremost, a Crusader — an avowed enemy of the jihad. His expeditions were, first and foremost, about circumventing and ultimately retaliating against the Islamic sultanates surrounding and terrorizing Europe — not just “finding spices” as we were taught in high school.

Many Europeans were convinced that if only they could reach the peoples east of Islam — who if not Christian were at least “not as yet infected by the Muhammadan plague,” to quote Pope Nicholas V (d.1455) — together they could crush Islam between them. The plan was centuries old and connected to the legend of Prester John, a supposedly great Christian monarch reigning in the East who would one day march westward and avenge Christendom by destroying Islam.

All this comes out clearly in Columbus’s own letters: in one he refers to Ferdinand and Isabella as “enemies of the wretched sect of Muhammad” who are “resolve[d] to send me to the regions of the Indies, to see [how the people thereof can help in the war effort].” In another written to the monarchs after he reached the New World, Columbus offers to raise an army “for the war and conquest of Jerusalem.” That his voyages centered on liberating Jerusalem from Islam is evident in the title of one 2011 book titled, Columbus and the Quest for Jerusalem.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ageofdiscovery; ageofsail; bloggers; christophercolumbus; columbus; columbusday; godsgravesglyphs; islam; islamofascism; islamofascists; koranimals; reconquista; spain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
Much more information in this very interesting article at the original source. I certainly was never taught any of this information in my public school education.
1 posted on 10/12/2022 7:10:26 PM PDT by DeweyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

Did you know that there are no indigenous people in the western hemisphere


2 posted on 10/12/2022 7:15:51 PM PDT by Captain Jack Aubrey (There's not a moment to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Jack Aubrey
Did you know that there are no indigenous people in the western hemisphere

You are correct.

By the time of Columbus, all the tribes in the Americas had replaced the first inhabitants many times over.

That is the same all over the world.

There are no cultures composed of "first inhabitants".

3 posted on 10/12/2022 7:21:58 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

.


4 posted on 10/12/2022 7:26:03 PM PDT by sauropod (Unbelief has nothing to say. Chance favors the prepared mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Jack Aubrey; All

🎚🇺🇸 Unfortunately, such an obvious honest historical axiom has become a “racist” and revolutionary thought.


5 posted on 10/12/2022 7:30:22 PM PDT by patriotfury ((May the fleas of a thousand camels occupy mo' ham mads tents!) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Captain Jack Aubrey

Perhaps you could get a dictionary and find out what indigenous means.
It’s one of the weird things about Free Republic that there are so many people offended that there are indigenous people in the Americas. I’ve yet to see one complaint about the indigenous people of Europe or other places.


6 posted on 10/12/2022 7:39:47 PM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Varda

It’s one of the weird things about Free Republic that there are so many people offended that there are indigenous people in the Americas. I’ve yet to see one complaint about the indigenous people of Europe or other places.

If you buy the “Out of Africa” theory, then there are no indigenous peoples anywhere but Africa. What most are saying is that almost everyone came from somewhere else.


7 posted on 10/12/2022 7:43:09 PM PDT by rxh4n1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Taxman

Ping


8 posted on 10/12/2022 7:47:06 PM PDT by Taxman (SAVE AMERICA! VOTE REPUBLICAN IN 2022, 2023 AND 2024!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxh4n1
That's not what indigenous means.
It simply means first group to occupy an area. Which means some indigenous people have only occupied their territory for a few hundred years. Others for many thousands.
9 posted on 10/12/2022 7:49:58 PM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Varda

That’s not what indigenous means.
It simply means first group to occupy an area. Which means some indigenous people have only occupied their territory for a few hundred years. Others for many thousands.

That’s how it is used by the race hustlers.


10 posted on 10/12/2022 8:00:58 PM PDT by rxh4n1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Taxman

Bookmark


11 posted on 10/12/2022 8:05:32 PM PDT by kelly4c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA; All

🎚🇺🇸🇮🇱 Columbus and His Creator

BY PAUL G. HUMBER, M.S. |

🔹️ TUESDAY, OCTOBER 01, 1991



“Some years ago, the Philadelphia Daily News published a cartoon characterizing Christians who hold to the fundamentals of the Bible as out of touch with reality.

As an educator, I found it particularly offensive. Sammy, standing on the Bible in a classroom with his back to the others, was looking at a flat “globe” of the earth. The other students and teacher, with quizzical looks on their faces, encompassed a normal (i.e. round) globe.

The teacher, presumably responding to a student’s question, is depicted as saying, “Because Sammy’s mom is a *fundamentalist, that’s why.”[1]

The intent seems to be to ridicule Bible-believing Christians and their view of science. Apparently neither the cartoonist nor the editors realized that Christopher Columbus, a round-earth activist of the highest degree, was driven far more by the Bible than by the science of his day. A dedicated student of the Scriptures, he put his faith into action.

Columbus’ own words

At last, after almost 500 years, *Libro de las profecias (Book of Prophecies), written and compiled by Columbus, may be seriously considered in English!

In her Christopher Columbus - His life and discovery in the light of his prophecies,[2] Kay Brigham has provided translations of major portions and analysis of his book. She describes it as “a compilation of passages from the Bible which the Admiral believed were pertinent to his mission of discovery, selected by Columbus himself with the help of his friend, Fray Gaspar de Gorricio.”

[2] Excerpting from folios 4-6 (using her book as source), I quote Columbus, who in turn was addressing his Spanish sovereigns:

🔹️ “At this time I have seen and put in study to look into all the Scriptures, cosmography, histories, chronicles and philosophy and other arts, which our Lord opened to my understanding (I could sense His hand upon me), so that it became clear to me that it was feasible to navigate from here to the Indies; and He unlocked within me the determination to execute the idea. And I came to your Highnesses with this ardor.

All those who heard about my enterprise rejected it with laughter, scoffing at me.

Neither the sciences which I mentioned above, nor the authoritative citations from them, were of any avail. In only your Highnesses remained [in] faith and constancy. Who doubts that this illumination was from the Holy Spirit? I attest that He (the Spirit), with marvelous rays of light, consoled me through the holy and sacred Scriptures . . . encouraging me to proceed, and, continually, without ceasing for a moment, they inflame me with a sense of great urgency. . . .

I am the worst of sinners. The pity and mercy of our Lord have completely covered me whenever I have called (on Him) for them. I have found the sweetest consolation in casting away all my anxiety, so as to contemplate His marvelous presence.

I have already said that for the execution of the enterprise of the Indies, neither reason, nor mathematics, nor world maps were profitable to me; rather the prophecy of Isaiah was completely fulfilled . . . .

Your Highnesses, remember the Gospel texts and the many promises which our Savior made to us, and how all this has been put to a test: (for example) St. Peter, when he leapt into the sea, walked upon (the water) as long as his faith remained firm.

The mountains will obey anyone who has faith the size of a kernel of corn.

All that is requested by anyone who has faith will be granted. Knock and it will be opened to you.

No one should be afraid to take on any enterprise in the name of our Savior, if it is right and if the purpose is purely for His holy service . . . .

The working out of all things was entrusted by our Lord to each person, (but it happens) in conformity with His sovereign will, even though he gives advice to many. He lacks nothing that it may be in the power of men to give him.

O, how good is the Lord who wishes people to perform that for which he holds himself responsible! Day and night, and at every moment, everyone should give Him their most devoted thanks.”[2]


Noted author, Simon Wiesenthal, in his Sails of Hope, confirmed earlier what is now clear from Columbus’ own writings:

“That religious elements played a great part in Columbus’s thoughts and actions is evident from all his writings. It may come as something of a surprise to us that his concept of sailing west to reach the Indies was less the result of geographical theories than of his faith in certain Biblical texts — specifically the Book of Isaiah.”[3]

Columbus - A Scoundrel?

William Loren Katz, though affirming Columbus’ “enormous skills, courage and ambition,” added that “Columbus carried in his heart the burning embers of hate” and repaid the “generosity” of the natives with “treachery.”[4] Others have similar concerns.

Sadly, exploitation of peoples and lands followed in Columbus’ wake, and Columbus himself contributed in part. His own testimony of being “the worst of sinners” has already been mentioned, but he also viewed himself as “Servant . . . of the Most High Saviour, Christ the Son of Mary.”[5]

He trusted apparently in Creator Jesus who forgives the sins of repentant sinners. Indeed, he named the very first island he landed on San Salvador out of regard for his “Holy Savior” (translation).

The esteemed Harvard historian, Samuel Eliot Morison, who dedicated a copy of his Pulitzer Prize-winning book, Admiral of the Ocean Sea to his “shipmate,” Lieutenant Commander Millard J. Klein, Kay Brigham’s father,[2] was more generous in his appraisal of Admiral Columbus. He wrote:

“I cannot forget the eternal faith that sent this man forth, to the benefit of all future ages.”[6]

Columbus sought the conversion of the natives. On the premise that people are lost without Christ, such a concern could be interpreted as an expression of genuine love rather than of hate. He prayed on San Salvador:

🔹️ “O Lord Almighty and Everlasting God, by Thy holy Word Thou hast created the heaven, and the earth, and the sea; blessed and glorified be Thy Name, and praised be Thy Majesty, which hath deigned to use us, Thy humble servants, that Thy holy Name may be proclaimed in this second part of the earth.”[7]

According to Morison, Columbus and his family were different from many of the others who wanted “to get gold quick and go home.” Only Columbus, “his family and a few faithful, humble souls” cared for establishing a “permanent settlement” and the transfer of Christianity to the Indies.[6]

Morison was not unaware of some of Columbus’ [failures], but he also wrote of his “humanity:”

“It was to Columbus’ credit that humanity prevailed over glory. It must have been a temptation to parade this brilliant savage royalty with their gold and feather ornaments at court.

But he thought of the cold weather in which they would suffer and die, of what the pretty daughters might expect from his men, of the disillusion that would await these innocent souls in Castile.

So he took compassion on them, declined the cacique’s request, and sent the Indians ashore in the ship’s boat after receiving their homage and fealty.”[6]

Kay Brigham’s assessment of Columbus is very positive:

“On account of faith — ‘being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we do not see’ (Hebrews 11:1) — Columbus discovered America, the most significant event for the human race after the birth, death, and resurrection of the Savior of the world. Faith liberated Columbus from the chains of human myopia, launching him on a divine mission and propelling him to a providential destination . . . initiating the histories of the United States, Canada, and the numerous American Republics and the phenomenal expansion of the Christian faith.”[2]


What Bible Passages Affected Columbus?

Scriptural passages cited by Columbus in his book, 🔹️ Libro de las profecias (Book of Prophecies)[2] include the following:

🔹️”The LORD reigneth, let the earth rejoice; let the multitude of isles be glad thereof” (Psalm 97:1)

🔹️”Sing unto the LORD a new song, and His praise from the ends of the earth, ye that go down to the sea, and all that is therein; the isles, and the inhabitants thereof” (Isaiah 42:10)

“Listen, O isles, unto Me; and hearken, ye people from far” (Isaiah 49:1)

“My righteousness is near; My salvation is gone forth . . . . The isles shall wait upon Me, and on Mine arm shall they trust” (Isaiah 51:5)

“I am sought of them that asked not for Me; I am found of them that sought Me not; I said, Behold Me, behold Me, unto a nation that was not called by My name” (Isaiah 65:1)

🔹️”Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: And, lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world” (Matthew 28:19,20)

🔹️”But ye shall receive power after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you; and you shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth” (Acts 1:8)


Conclusion

“Columbus always loved to apply the Sacred Scriptures to his own life and adventures,”[6] according to Morison.

Wilbur E. Garret, National Geographic Editor, shares that this was also true at his death: “Son Ferdinand reports that 🔹️Columbus repeated the words attributed to Christ on the Cross — `Into your hands, Father, I commend my soul’ — and died.”[8]


— References —

Philadelphia Daily News, October 28, 1986, p. 33.

Kay Brigham, Christopher Columbus - His life and discovery in the light of his prophecies (Terrassa, Barcelona: CLIE Publishers, 1990), pp. 53, 61, 82, 85, 86, 115, 124, 125, 127, 129, 131, 167.

Simon Wiesenthal, Sails of Hope (New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., 1973), p. 122.

William Loren Katz, “’Ill Winds’ Drove Columbus,” The New York Times, October 8, 1979.

Samuel Eliot Morison, “Christopher Columbus, Mariner,” American Heritage, December 1955, p. 93.
Samuel Eliot Morison, Admiral of the Ocean Sea (Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1942), pp. 6, 206, 476, 494.

Peter J. Marshall, Jr., and David B. Manuel, Jr. The Light and the Glory (Old Tappan, NJ: Fleming H. Revell Co., 1977), p. 41.

Wilbur E. Garrett, “Columbus and the New World,” National Geographic, November 1986, p. 564

https://www.icr.org/article/347


12 posted on 10/12/2022 8:08:52 PM PDT by patriotfury ((May the fleas of a thousand camels occupy mo' ham mads tents!) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rxh4n1

That’s how it’s used in archeology and anthropology. It’s been used that way for many decades.
Of course there are people who attach a value to the designation but that’s on the person who does it. For instance many freepers seem to think it has inherit property rights. I don’t think so but if you do that’s on you. It doesn’t change the meaning of the word.


13 posted on 10/12/2022 8:11:22 PM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: patriotfury
Interesting post. One tidbit a history professor mentioned to us was that the authorities that opposed Columbus’ plan did so because they thought he had miscalculated the circumference of the earth. They were right but Providence provided a continent for Columbus to find.
14 posted on 10/12/2022 8:24:34 PM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

You assume Columbus’ motivation mattered. It didn’t, not one whit. In the end, only the motives of the financiers of his voyages — the Spanish monarchs — mattered.

The Catholics drove the occupying Moors from the Iberian peninsula the same year as when Columbus began his first voyage, 1492. And on his return, Columbus undoubtedly would have told Ferdinand and Isabella that the natives he had encountered in the Americas all were primitives who lacked the wheel and any form of ferrous metallurgy, all far too backward to be of any material assistance in the war against the Muhammadans.

Not only did the 1492 expulsion of the Moors take the heat off the Spanish monarchy to bring allies from the other side of the world to help fight them, Spain knew the American civilizations were entirely too backward to be of any help in that regard anyway.

In light of which, it beggars belief that the Spanish would have financed a further two voyages for Columbus if they were in the least bit concerned with recruiting allies for their fight against the Muhammadans.


15 posted on 10/12/2022 8:30:26 PM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

Quite correct.

Also: Columbus was responsible for changing the diet of Europeans by bringing tomatoes and potatoes to the “Old World”.

Can you even imagine pre-Columban Italian cuisine?

And by bringing potatoes Columbus was indirectly responsible for the early 19th century Irish immigration spurred by the potato famine.


16 posted on 10/12/2022 8:42:15 PM PDT by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA
Many Europeans were convinced that if only they could reach the peoples east of Islam — who if not Christian were at least “not as yet infected by the Muhammadan plague,” to quote Pope Nicholas V (d.1455) — together they could crush Islam between them.

Too bad it didn't work

17 posted on 10/12/2022 9:14:46 PM PDT by GaryCrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Varda
"...he had miscalculated the circumference of the earth. They were right but Providence provided a continent for Columbus to find. ..."

Spain was fourth on Columbus' list for potential financiers for his first voyage. England, France and Portugal already had turned him down because they knew he had miscalculated and the voyage would take much longer than he was anticipating.

Not only had Columbus misunderestimated earth's circumference, he had bought Marco Polo's story hook, line and sinker. Polo exaggerated the expanse of China so as to make his voyages sound all the more remarkable. Take the two errors in combination and Columbus was expecting to find the easternmost edge of Asia about 7000 miles further to the east than it actually is.

The range of all sailing vessels is determined by how long the food and water will hold out. All of Columbus' ships were substantially smaller than the Pilgrim's Mayflower. I can't find a reference confirming this but I'd once read the range of a Spanish caravel was about 3500 miles. Which meant exploratory voyages usually sailed out about 1750 miles and then turned back. Except from the Azores to San Salvador, Bahamas is more than 3000 miles.

There's a story that Columbus was awake in his bunk, weighing the decision to turn back just as they sighted land. What's not clear is whether they might already have sailed too far and had too little provisions on board to get back to the Azores.

A lot of crew routinely died from scurvy and such under best of conditions, so it's a certainly a substantial portion of them would have died trying to get back to the Azores. And without fair winds and good luck, it's entirely possible they all would have perished and we never would have heard the name "Cristoforo Corombo."

Which is why I long have considered Columbus to be the luckiest explorer who ever lived. Because I don't know of another whose life was saved by discovering an unknown continent.

But I also think Columbus had to have been one of history's greatest salesmen. It's a certainty he was a smooth-talking son-of-a-gun, else the crew would have slit his throat and tossed his body into the sea long before they'd got to 3000 miles, turned around, sailed back to Spain and told Ferdinand and Isabela their captain was taken by the bloody flux.

18 posted on 10/12/2022 9:22:47 PM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA
Yep.

A Jewish Crusader.

Who was sailing to prove the earth was round. Except everyone knew the earth was round.

19 posted on 10/12/2022 9:27:44 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (The nation of france was named after a hedgehog... The hedgehog's name was Kevin... Don't ask)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
There are no cultures composed of "first inhabitants".

Iceland.

20 posted on 10/12/2022 9:28:38 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (The nation of france was named after a hedgehog... The hedgehog's name was Kevin... Don't ask)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson