Posted on 09/10/2022 10:31:17 AM PDT by nickcarraway
“Not all women are like that - this was my point.”
That’s like saying not all pitbulls are mean. In a democracy where everyone gets to vote, it’s not the exception that counts but the average.
The Margaret Thatchers are few and far between.
Women have a lot of wonderful qualities but being effective, rational leaders is not their strong point.
Also, on AVERAGE, they more often vote for superficial qualities and emotional appeal rather than more substantive reasons. Not a good criteria for electing leaders.
“The corresponding type of male is not the stud, but rather the cuckold — someone who gives his commitment and support without receiving in return her love and faithfulness, and who may not even be getting any sex out of the relationship.”
That’s true, and I by no means was saying that stud corresponded to slut, but that feminists want to equate the two.
What corresponds to stud in the female world would be “vixen”, or “siren”, or “gold digger”.
That's why she was known as the "Iron Lady".
But not women or men?
Also known as a simp.
It is a majority of women vote for big government, not ALL.
Well... I’m not an ordinary woman obviously.
Lol!
Not buying that premise since many Republican men and women love that “compound interest”/COLA of SS, Medicare subsidies, and Earned Income Tax Credits.
If your premise was correct, Nixon would of got killed in the primary by someone who was a fiscal zealot, Carter would have never gotten close to the White House, Reagan would of vanquished Federal agencies especially *cough, cough* Department of Education he ran on ending... yet Administrative Law and debt grows and grows. Hard putting that “Genie back into the bottle”. People have traded self-government for security many decades ago.
Worse still, why go into debt for a cow that won't give you any milk but gave (and may still give) it away for free to others?
What leftists call feminism is actually masculinism. There's nothing feminine about tattoos, one-night stands, high confidence, assertive confrontation of strangers. Leftists always name their causes the opposite of what they really are, because they have to.
Read later.
>>>They are more fearful than men in general and it’s obvious why they simply aren’t as capable of defending themselves physically<<<
If you’re a 20 year old man you probably wouldn’t think like this. I myself was born in 1970 and I remember being taught anything a man could do, a woman could do. Now I’m pretty sure most of us boys thought that wasn’t really true. Think about occupations like police and fire that were almost 100% male back in those days. But fast forward a few decades and why wouldn’t a young man believe anything a man can do, a woman can do? Women are everywhere. There are zero male spaces left. And Hollywood is always showing little women doing a spin kick and beating up men twice her size. The media goes to extraordinary lengths to highlight a woman’s accomplishment.
So what’s the point of this? It’s simply that I don’t think young men view women as the weaker sex. They aren’t thought of as fragile and need to be treated with care. And that’s helping women go nuts imo. Because isn’t that exactly what a woman needs? Especially if she’s going to be a new mother?
Women can’t have it both ways. They can’t choose having the best of traditionalism and feminism. If they want to compete with men for jobs, they will be treated like a man in my opinion. If women run around telling men they don’t need them, men will respond accordingly.
I agree completely with your post, the most clear, concise and comprehensive on the thread.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.