Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

One more blockbuster Supreme Court decision could still be coming even after Friday's abortion ruling
Fox News ^ | June 28, 2022 | By Liz Peek | Fox News

Posted on 06/29/2022 10:10:03 PM PDT by 11th_VA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: kabar; 11th_VA

The next things that needs to be reigned in are executive orders and prosecutor discretion.


21 posted on 06/29/2022 11:21:35 PM PDT by aquila48 (Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you is how they control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

Amen!


22 posted on 06/29/2022 11:31:57 PM PDT by spirited irish ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

They had two. They post all their decisions here.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinion/21


23 posted on 06/29/2022 11:34:22 PM PDT by matt04 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

the bad part is that Congress is still either controlled by the deep state or soros. I heard what’s “really” coming is fag marriage validity and immigration.


24 posted on 06/29/2022 11:37:58 PM PDT by max americana (Fired leftards at work since 2008 at every election just to see them cry. I hate them all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Besides the EPA ruling, coming down tomorrow is the remain in Mexico ruling.


25 posted on 06/29/2022 11:44:05 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (My body, my choice....but not when it comes down to unconstitutional "vaccine" mandates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

If SCOTUS declares the energy rule to be unconstitutional and also declares that the Remain in Mexico rule cannot be rescinded in violation of the APA it will make the Dems’ heads explode. They have lost the religion case, Roe v Wade and NY gun case already. That’s 5 major cases this session that “if Garland had been confirmed” that would not have been ruled against the left.


26 posted on 06/30/2022 1:26:47 AM PDT by usnavy_cop_retired (Retiree in the P.I. living as a legal immigrant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Supreme Court says states can be sued for discriminating against veterans (called to active duty - returned to no job).

Reservists right?


27 posted on 06/30/2022 2:24:11 AM PDT by Clutch Martin ("The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

Amen


28 posted on 06/30/2022 2:33:05 AM PDT by gattaca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: exnavy

Do not count your chickens before they hatch.

There will be great resistance to all these SCOTUS decisions and those will come back as court cases.

We are only safe as long as we have the majority on the court.


29 posted on 06/30/2022 2:52:35 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (We are being manipulated by forces that most do not see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Equine1952

You are correct... the fundamental issue is the 17th Amendment.

It’s past time to repeal the 17th Amendment and eliminate the Senior Executive Service.


30 posted on 06/30/2022 2:55:58 AM PDT by Article10 (Roger That)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA
2) Supreme Court says states can be sued for discriminating against veterans (called to active duty - returned to no job)

I'd like to know what the case was that resulted in that decision because there already is The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA).

Maybe it was an employer's violation of that law that made it to the Supreme Court.

The question I have is how does an employer adhere to the law if that employee's department was eliminated while in the service.

Back in the early 80's, my unionized manufacturing plant in Detroit sold off a division that resulted in the loss of approx. 300 jobs. After that, an employee who was serving 4 years in the Army was discharged and requested to come back to work in the department that no longer existed.

I can't remember how that turned out but I think we had to place him on layoff status due to his low seniority. Meaning, the employees who lost their jobs had the right to bump into another department if they had higher seniority, which this Vet didn't have......

31 posted on 06/30/2022 3:29:07 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Don't walk thru the watermelon patch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Prayers up! This is really big!


32 posted on 06/30/2022 3:36:51 AM PDT by griswold3 (When chaos serves the State, the State will encourage chaos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Where would the lawmakers stuff the 20 million unemployed bureaucrats. Even they do not have the room where I think they need to be stuffed.


33 posted on 06/30/2022 3:44:00 AM PDT by eartick (Stupidity is expecting the government that broke itself to go out and fix itself. Texan for TEXIT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Having things forced down our throats by unelected and elected officials needs to end


34 posted on 06/30/2022 3:45:44 AM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Why wouldn’t environmental laws be the purview of the states?


35 posted on 06/30/2022 3:56:10 AM PDT by gitmo (If your theology doesn't become your biography, what good is it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

West Virginia vs. the EPA asks whether important policies that impact the lives of all Americans should be made by unelected D.C. bureaucrats or by Congress. This SCOTUS could well decide that ruling by executive agency fiat is no longer acceptable.

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

So would this ruling also cover such things as vax or mask mandates?


36 posted on 06/30/2022 4:11:55 AM PDT by thinden (buckle up.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Dear mercy, this would be astounding!


37 posted on 06/30/2022 4:13:53 AM PDT by Guenevere (“If the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do?”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cletus

This WVA vs EPA may be the biggie?


38 posted on 06/30/2022 4:15:24 AM PDT by thinden (buckle up.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Clutch Martin
Reservists right?

Yes - Reservist was injured on active duty; couldn’t return to his same job. Said state still had to accommodate a new job; SCOTUS agreed 5-4;

5 = the leftist plus Kavanaugh and Roberts.

Odd majority, but I agree with the outcome

39 posted on 06/30/2022 4:31:03 AM PDT by 11th_VA (I can still remember an America where dissent was the highest form of patriotism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

This was the TX state troopers firing a guy who had deployed to the sandbox and came back with damaged lungs from being around a burn pit. He should have a lot of back pay coming to him.


40 posted on 06/30/2022 4:35:04 AM PDT by afsnco (18 of 20 in AF JAG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson