Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Government and WHO CORONA Lies
Robert W. Malone via https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/ ^ | 5-19-2022 | Dr. Robert W. Malone

Posted on 05/20/2022 8:10:35 AM PDT by Texas Fossil

This is not subtle. Incompetence or Nefarious Evil Intent? Hard to tell the difference.

As the sitting POTUS and his entourage is about to head over to the UN and WHO for a little quality time and a vote on circumventing the constitution, this seems a good time to briefly review the current state of affairs.

Ask yourself, have these people earned our trust? Do they have any right to set and police global health policies? Apparently Joe Biden (or whoever is his current puppet master) and Tony Fauci think so.

A brief list of some of the COVID lies we have heard over the last couple of years (with thanks and acknowledgment to Dr. Scott Atlas):

  1. SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus has a far higher fatality rate than influenza virus by several orders of magnitude

  2. Everyone has a significant risk of death from COVID-19.

  3. No one has immunity, because this virus is new (“novel”) and so expedited vaccine development and deployment is essential.

  4. Everyone is dangerous and spreads the infection

  5. Asymptomatic people are major drivers of the spread of disease.

  6. Locking down- closing schools and businesses, confining people to their homes, stopping non-COVID medical care, and eliminating travel will stop/eliminate the virus.

  7. Masks will protect everyone and stop the spread.

  8. Immune protection can only be obtained with a vaccine.

  9. Natural immunity conferred by infection and recovery is short lived and inferior to vaccine-induced immunity.

Who was responsible for these lies?

  1. Deborah Birx (who was trained by Anthony Fauci).

    She wrote virtually all official White House guidance to state Governors.

    This usurped constitutional authority of states to set public health policies.

  2. Anthony Fauci

  3. Francis Collins

What were their policy decisions?

  1. “Flatten the Curve”… Then “Stop all cases”

  2. No masks. All masked.

  3. Lockdowns: School closures, business shutdowns, limits on medical care, a host of restrictions, mandates and quarantines.

  4. Perverse financial incentives for hospitals to over diagnose COVID-19, over use Remdesivir and ventilation, and cause a massive wave of iatrogenic (drug/doctor caused) excess death.

  5. Stop early treatment and block repurposed drug use.

  6. “come back to the hospital when your lips are blue”

What was the effect of their policy decisions?

  1. Virus? >1,000,000 American deaths attributed to the virus. One of this highest mortality rates per capita in the world.

  2. Lockdowns? Caused massive deaths and severely harmed millions of families and children, especially working class and poor.

The better alternative was known by March, 2020, known as “targeted protection”

What were the alternative policies proposed?

  1. Increase the protection of the high-risk groups with an unprecedented focus

  2. Reopen society, including medical care, schools, businesses and hospitals

  3. Carefully monitor hospital capacity and supplement when needed

This set of policy recommendations was codified on October 04, 2020 as the Great Barrington Declaration.

According to Wikipedia:

“The Great Barrington Declaration was an open letter published in October 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdowns.[1][2] It claimed harmful COVID-19 lockdowns could be avoided via the fringe notion of "focused protection", by which those most at risk could purportedly be kept safe while society otherwise continued functioning normally.[3] The envisaged result was herd immunity in three months as SARS-CoV-2 swept through.[1][2][3] Authored by Sunetra Gupta of the University of Oxford, Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford University, and Martin Kulldorff of Harvard University, it was drafted at the American Institute for Economic Research in Great Barrington, Massachusetts, signed there on 4 October 2020, and published on 5 October.[2][4] The document presumes without evidence that the disease burden of mass infection can be tolerated, that any infection confers long term sterilizing immunity, and makes no mention of physical distancing, masks, contact tracing,[5] or long COVID, which has left patients suffering from debilitating symptoms months after the initial infection.”

Why did the public believe the Lockdowners"?

  1. Culture of trust (of the credentialed class)

  2. Fear (actively weaponized against the public by the government, WHO, and legacy media)

  3. Demonization of opposing views (globally coordinated propaganda and censorship campaign)

  4. Legacy media, social media, and political campaigns

Key messaging to support the lies.

  1. If you are against lockdowns, you are selfish and choosing the economy over lives

  2. If you are against lockdowns, you are for allowing the infection to spread without mitigation and therefore in favor of unnecessary and preventable deaths

Active Destruction and Denial of fundamental public health ethics.

“If a school is implementing a testing strategy, testing should be offered on a voluntary basis. It is unethical and illegal to test someone who does not want to be tested, including students whose parents or guardians do not want them to be tested”

CDC, October 13, 2020

Mandating vaccines for Children

“But we’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it. That’s just the way it goes.”

Eric Rubin, MD. Editor in Chief, New England Journal of Medicine. October 26, 2021

FDA Advisory meeting on vaccine approval in children.

How to restore trust in Science?

  1. Admit errors in public forums

  2. Change Leadership

  3. Strengthen conflict of interest rules and add term limits on government agency leadership positions

  4. Clarify definition of “public health emergency” with strict time limits, adding legislative action requirement to extend

  5. Restore appropriate roles of health agencies to advise, rather than set rules

  6. Fact check the media

  7. Decentralize research funding

  8. Introduce new transparency and accountability

    1. De anonymize reviews of papers and grants

    2. Increase independent oversight to government agencies and committees

    3. Evaluate universities regarding ethics, free debate

    4. New training programs, including logic and ethics for journalists, doctors, and scientists



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chinavirus; corona; government; lies; malone; robertmalone; who
There are many more links at the source, and photo's for the text.

The globalists never give up.

1 posted on 05/20/2022 8:10:35 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

“How to restore trust in science?”

Arrests. Life sentences.


2 posted on 05/20/2022 8:15:00 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

Dr. Pierre Kory on having COVID-19 research censored by Big Tech

Sen. Johnson and Dr. Pierre Kory on the impact of censorship in fight against COVID-19

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., and Dr. Pierre Kory, Chief Medical Officer of the FLCCC Alliance, weigh in on ‘Sunday Morning Futures.’

“I’m a lifelong Democrat. I voted for Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. I used to have an inherent aversion to Republicans, as I joke with colleagues, similar to how the vaccinated feel about the unvaccinated today. But as the pandemic unfolded, and I discussed with doctors across the country and around the world my experience treating patients, I met many new conservative colleagues and friends who put politics aside to focus on doing our best at the bedside. It made me more tolerant and understanding of their worldviews.

At the same time, I used to view Democrats, and the center-left more broadly, as the champions of free speech both in civil society and in our professional institutions. But now, as with today’s progressive political movement, medical boards are adopting policies that censor opinions, defining such speech as mis- or disinformation, especially scientific opinions around COVID.

Medical professionals who refuse to toe the party line risk censorship, cancellation, and even the loss of license—a fate far worse than getting banned from Twitter.

The trend is forcing doctors who exhibit critical thinking to face an existential choice: join the mob and support what many of us believe are dangerous policies without a sound scientific basis, or stand up and risk losing your livelihood.

This trend has troubling long-term implications for patients—something all of us will become at some point in our lives.”

excerpted:
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/doctor-democrat-covid-censorship-pierre-kory


3 posted on 05/20/2022 8:15:45 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (,JUST LEAVE US ALONE!...Be whatever, you think you are!!!! On YOUR Time and Dime, NOT OURS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron

It is very bad.


4 posted on 05/20/2022 8:17:18 AM PDT by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

The million death figure is exaggerated, because it was in their interest to exaggerate it… but accepting that figure as real, the virus didn’t kill a million people, CDC protocols killed a million people. The war on hydroxy and ivermectin killed a million people.


5 posted on 05/20/2022 8:17:54 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Absolutely correct.


6 posted on 05/20/2022 8:18:54 AM PDT by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

Ingests let pill with chips, a la Pfizer at Davos

https://nitter.net/loffredojeremy/status/1527521228688445442#m


7 posted on 05/20/2022 8:20:08 AM PDT by combat_boots (Nothing is built. Nothing is back. Nothing is better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

Ethics won’t help this.

The only thing that will is a thriving private sector insurance market that allows folks to be in charge of their healthcare instead of the government.


8 posted on 05/20/2022 8:20:12 AM PDT by mewzilla (We need to repeal RCV wherever it's in use and go back to dumb voting machines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

There’s another choice for docs: Go concierge. Even if Deep State yanks licenses, I’d still be more than happy to pay for advice from someone I trust.

I’d even be willing to sign the mother of all liability waivers to get it.


9 posted on 05/20/2022 8:22:35 AM PDT by mewzilla (We need to repeal RCV wherever it's in use and go back to dumb voting machines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marron

yes


10 posted on 05/20/2022 8:46:06 AM PDT by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Go concierge!

The costs out here in LaLa land were/are prohibiting to everyone but the super rich elites.

That was before the Covid B$, and it is even more expensive now.


11 posted on 05/20/2022 9:17:57 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (,JUST LEAVE US ALONE!...Be whatever, you think you are!!!! On YOUR Time and Dime, NOT OURS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

There’s another choice for docs: Go concierge. Even if Deep State yanks licenses, I’d still be more than happy to pay for advice from someone I trust.

There are alternatives to our system which are more economical and probably better than our current system with the roots based post WWII.

Skin rashes and problems seem to be very treatable with photos of the rashes sent to the clinic or doctors’s office.

My wife had a hip replacement on 1 Mar and was home that evening and never spent anytime/night in the hospital.

Her doctor wanted to see how she was healing at 2 weeks post op, and the drive was 45 minutes on a good day and an hour + on a bad traffic day. She really didn’t want to do it.

So I asked the doctor if we could send photos of her post op scar and temps. He seemed a little hesitant. I asked, “How about me taking and sending pics and taking temps.?”

He said okay, but he wanted the RN/PT on her upcoming visit to take pics, temps and her feelings.

So we did both, and she did see him 2 months postop, we combined Xrays minutes before her appointment with him.

So, he had our photos, the RN/PT’s photos and her status on my wife.

He examined my wife and told her to keep up the PT, and when we removed the bandage, he put on in the office. She did not need any more bandages. He would see her in a year unless problems happened.

She has done very well for an 82 year old with a new hip.
Zero nights in a hospital, one return visit to the surgeon hospital and pt at home recovering instead of a hospital.

A grand daughter was graduated from a good RN school a year ago. She passed the national tests. Then the hospital where she worked for pay for 2 years, hired her as a full time RN.

She is now in charge of their COVID unit for the pm shift on Fri, Sat and Sunday.

She originally wanted to be a traveling RN with the great pay and different hospitals every few months.

Another opportunity may be coming out.

The old Visiting Nurse program, may evolve into the High Tech RN making house calls for diagnosis with incredible equipment that would enable them to take lab specimens and transmit a sample to live techs and doctors to make a diagnosis or to measure how treatment is going. She would take videos of the patients explaining their symptoms, before, during and after treatment to go with the current lab values.

Patients with the new cardiac pacemakers can be evaluated and calibrated with the patients hundreds of miles away from the cardio techs and cardiologists. We know a woman who got a new pacemaker a year ago and then moved from N. California to just south of Portland. Her pacemaker is managed from California, and the data is sent to Portland and back to California. Somehow, the new 5G nets will handle this data and adjustments made on the go or at the patients home.


12 posted on 05/20/2022 10:44:31 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (,JUST LEAVE US ALONE!...Be whatever, you think you are!!!! On YOUR Time and Dime, NOT OURS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long; Jan_Sobieski; metmom; LucyT; 2ndreconmarine; Fitzcarraldo; Covenantor; Mother Abigail; ..

Ping


13 posted on 05/20/2022 11:57:20 AM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil
The globalists never give up.

Next, the Monkey epidemic. At least until they can steal another election.

14 posted on 05/20/2022 5:11:05 PM PDT by Don Corleone (leave the gun, take the canolis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

Not a good time for satans warriors to keep pushing.


15 posted on 05/20/2022 5:23:46 PM PDT by eyedigress (Trump is my President! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

We will see.

There are elements of our culture and society that will never accept what they are selling.

Some of them may deal with them.


16 posted on 05/20/2022 6:40:28 PM PDT by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

4 am - thx.


17 posted on 05/25/2022 10:57:05 PM PDT by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here ; - )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson