Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

I would not want to be guilty of wishful thinking but anybody sane would see the writing on the wall that the court will not support the ETS and therefore not support the “Regular Standard”

Of course we we are not dealing with sane people.


51 posted on 11/18/2021 1:31:55 PM PST by Sequoyah101 (Politicians are only marginally good at one thing, being politicians. Otherwise they are fools.I ha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Sequoyah101
I see the OSHA route as eventually killed. Out of their lane.

BUT ... we are dealing with courts here, and any outcome is possible.

Timeline of final standards is varibale depending on whther OSHA grants hearings and so on. Could drag outuntil June 2020 pretty easily. Time for comments on a final rule runs to January 4, 2022.

All this is waste - waste by OSHA (I wonder how much ot cost to put together that 154 page notice in the FR), waste by compliance officers in companies (although most will comply because they just love to boss people around andnow they have a reason), lawyers and experts all around.

Crazy world.

Feds have other agencies that could overreach to similar effect. Jerk the country around. Satan's minions, hard at work.

52 posted on 11/18/2021 1:37:57 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson