“There are two exceptions,” he said. “One is a sincerely held religious belief and two is if someone has a disability such that they would have an adverse reaction to a vaccine.”
How does one define “sincerely held”, “religious belief”, “disability” and “adverse reaction”? They could be defined in such a way to apply to everyone, or to no one.
I sincerely believe God gave me an immune system.
Stop throwing away those Jehovah's Witnesses brochures and keep them handy to give to your boss, make sure to memorize a few of the catch phrases and ask if he or she would like to be converted.
Defining “Sincerely Held Religious Beliefs” That Might Excuse Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination?
Mark S. Spring
Whether or not a religious belief is sincerely held by an applicant or employee is rarely at issue in most religious discrimination lawsuits. With both the EEOC and DFEH guidance requiring employers to accommodate an employee who has a sincerely held religious belief that prevents an employee from receiving any of the COVID-19 vaccinations, the issue of what is a “sincerely held religious belief” has become more important in employment law. This is particularly true for those employers that decide to mandate the COVID-19 vaccination as a condition of employment or condition of receiving certain employment benefits.
Challenging the Sincerity of a Religious Belief
Whether a belief is “sincerely held” is generally an issue of individual credibility. While evidence proving that an employee acted inconsistently with his alleged sincerely held religious belief is relevant to determine whether the belief is sincere, this evidence is difficult to obtain in most cases, and often can be overcome, as sincerely held religious beliefs are not static and often change over time. See, e.g., EEOC v. Ilona of Hungary, Inc., 108 F.3d 1569, 1575 (7th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (finding that a Jewish employee proved her request for leave to observe Yom Kippur was based on a sincerely held religious belief, even though she had never in her prior eight-year tenure sought leave from work for a religious observance, and conceded that she generally was not a very religious person, but evidence showed that the recent birth of her son and the death of her father strengthened her religious beliefs); EEOC v. IBP, Inc., 824 F. Supp. 147, 151 (C.D. Ill. 1993) (holding that Seventh-day Adventist employee’s previous absence of faith and subsequent loss of faith did not prove that his religious beliefs were insincere at the time that he refused to work on the Sabbath). The law is clear that a sincere religious believer doesn’t forfeit his religious rights merely because he is not scrupulous in his observance or had never openly demonstrated those beliefs in the past.
Sincerely Held Religious Beliefs Do Not Need to Be Express Tenets of a Religion in Order to Require Accommodation
In religious discrimination cases, employers often believe that the burden is on the employee to prove that the sincerely held religious practice (for example not getting vaccinated) is an express requirement of the employee’s religion, and absent proof of such requirement, no accommodation is necessary. However, the definition of sincerely held religious belief is not necessarily tied to express religious requirements.
Muslims will get a pass.
They were rejecting a lot of the religious objections in Houston at that hospital.
And yet many states permit people wearing spaghetti strainers on the heads in the driver’s license photos citing “legitimate” religious beliefs.
“How does one define “sincerely held”, “religious belief”, “disability” “
Easy. You would have to prove you regularly attended, and are a member of a church that doesn’t believe in shots.
A long time connection with one of the religions that are known to be opposed to medical treatment would be my guess. Christian Scientists, Scientology, Amish, Jehovah's Witnesses, and a few others.
... “disability” and “adverse reaction”?
Past history of serious reactions to other inoculations.