“assuming some 200 million got the vaccine.... We’re well past that already, as 35,86410 people “
Where’s the comma supposed to be, please? This has shown up a few times in different posts and nobody ever corrects the comma.
“5,993 deaths”
300,000 have died from covid in the same period if we’re just talking the US. Somewhere around a quarter of the symptomatic survivors have long covid.
“Zelenko suspects the number of deaths may exceed 100,000 already.”
this could actually provable - except - the number of deaths in the US and in the UK have remained steady or declined since vaccinations began. Breakthrough infections and covid deaths in the first-served elderly vaccinated are rare, fatalities are largely limited to the unvaccinated or partly vaccinated.
” 15,472 deaths....27 of the 50 European countries.”
that’s 573 per country averaged. So why so ‘low’ for the EU and 10x higher for the US ? With the same vaccines? And with the EU having an overall lower standard of medical care?
the logic is just too crunchy for an argument against the vaccine and too long winded on how to cash in, which seems to be the primary theme of these reprints.
(VAERS) had posted 358,379 adverse events.....
35,86410 people “Where’s the comma supposed to be, please????
Poor editing. My guess is he’s basing his estimates on the Harvard study which estimates only 10% of adverse events get reported. Thus 10x 358K would put the commas ~ 3,586,410.
The 100K number seems based on anecdotal extrapolation.
Take away the heart attacks and everything else people really died of but tested positive and that 300,000 becomes a few thousand
The vax may have a better track record than the virus itself, but nearly 6,000 vax-related deaths, when compared to the normal acceptability range of 25 to 50 deaths for a new vaccine, means I’m not going to bother getting a booster. The two Pfizer shots I received are enough for me for the time being.