From WHAT?
Speak all you want, but know this:
>
Posted on 03/16/2021 11:57:05 AM PDT by george76
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees free speech to all private citizens. But as conservatives have had to learn the hard way, our First Amendment protections are not safe in the era of Big Tech.
Recently, we’ve witnessed unprecedented efforts on the part of Big Tech monopolies to coordinate the censorship of conservative political views. Just recently, Amazon Web Services, Google, and Apple conspired to boot the conservative-friendly social media app Parler off the web. And every day, more stories emerge of conservatives and Christians who find their social media accounts suspended, banned or otherwise censored for voicing their views.
If these trends continue, it won’t matter that we have the First Amendment at all; conservatives and Christians will still find it impossible to voice their opinions online and in the media. We need a change, and we need to hold Big Tech accountable.
America was founded to be a safe haven for free speech and religious liberty. Many, if not most, of the original colonists were fleeing religious and political persecution at home. In response, the Founding Fathers built our country from the ground up to protect people from persecution for expressing different viewpoints or practicing their religion peaceably.
Today, Americans still enjoy greater freedoms than almost any other country in the world, and our Constitution protects every citizen from censorship by state actors. But those same constitutional protections don’t safeguard speech from Big Tech.
For years now, Big Tech companies have grown ever more left-leaning. While these companies have a legal right to decide what speech is published on their platforms, they’re increasingly abusing that right to advance a partisan political agenda. Mainstream media sites, alongside many leftist politicians, treat censorship by Big Tech as an essential instrument in the fight to protect American democracy. In reality, Big Tech censorship means silencing, distorting, and suppressing ordinary American viewpoints for no other reason than political gain.
I have firsthand experience of how misguided and inappropriate Big Tech censorship can be. For months, my daughter had her own Pinterest account. She used that account to create informative pins with inspiring Bible verses, and even utilized Pinterest to organize an online Bible study. But Pinterest banned her, on the specious grounds that her posts contained “violent language.”
I can personally attest that all my daughter posted was Biblical language. It frankly doesn’t matter whether Pinterest has the legal right to moderate content on its own platform; this kind of one-sided and politically charged censorship of straightforwardly Christian views should be intolerable to all of us in America. When just a handful of companies can decide what views count as appropriate or inappropriate in the public sphere, we’re no longer living up to the vision our founders had for this country.
Luckily, a few politicians are taking action to protect free speech. Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida has put forward new laws to prevent unbridled tech censorship, and there is a bill in Texas that would give citizens a legal right to petition for declaratory relief if their online accounts are unfairly suspended.
We need more politicians to step up to the task and tackle censorship head-on. And we need conservatives and Christians across the country to advocate for their right to speak their minds, discuss their views and share their faith.
Political tensions are high in America today. We can’t afford to let private tech monopolies conspire to make politically motivated decisions about what is or is not allowable speech. There may not be an easy fix for the situation we’re in. But the time is now to fight for a better, smarter framework for moderating speech. Inaction or silence might cost us our freedom.
Declare large-scale social media anti-competitive and a defacto public utility, then current law applies. Problem solved.
Google’s Nest unit is expanding into health technology with a feature that tracks sleep patterns, offering a potential new revenue stream but also raising privacy concerns.
Here at FreeRepublic, we don’t have any problems. JimRob owns his own domain, and his own servers.
Liberals took full advantage of the lack of specific and established law to push their own agenda.
There was a power vacuum and with predictable Republican inertia, Liberals OF COURSE, could NOT help themselves.
Democrats and big tech are a team. Ain’t gonna be no laws passed protecting free speech. Just the opposite.
Has there ever been a time when those who ban books and limit free speech, have been the “Good Guys”?
Libs and Karens will leave any platform where the other side gets to show their arguments are total trash. The big sites know this. They would rather get rid of a few conservatives, than lose a much larger number of libs and Karens.
The framework is to tighten up the First Amendment!
We used to have a really smart framework for protecting free speech called the US SC. Then we put Roberts, Gorsuch, fratboy and RCB redux on the court and the dumb clucks have been sitting on their brains for so long they can't find standing in any case of any import to protecting the Republic.
We need to define what "large-scale" means. And we need to make sure that places like Free Republic and DU are exempted.
Facebook has 221 million US users.
Twitter has 69 million US users.
Youtube has 197 million US users.
So I say "Large-scale" means a user count more than 5% of the population of the United States. (340 million * 5% = 17 million users. Define it as a percentage not a hard number so that it grows with the population.
But have exemptions...If the social media platform prominently portrays that the platform has a political bias and that opposing political viewpoints may be censored. Then they are exempt up to 25% of the population.
Why would you need MOAR laws when free speech is already enshrined in our founding documents?
Can someone just email and call the webhost and they cave and Free Republic disappears?
WHOIS search results
Domain Name: FREEREPUBLIC.COM
Registry Domain ID: 2351706_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.gkg.net
Registrar URL: http://www.gkg.net
Updated Date: 2020-11-15T15:24:03Z
Creation Date: 1996-09-23T04:00:00Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2025-09-22T04:00:00Z
Registrar: GKG.Net, Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 93
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@gkg.net
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.8776951790
From WHAT?
Speak all you want, but know this:
>
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.