Funny how insecure leftards are. They have to remind us in every paragraph that this is a "baseless" claim, or a "false" claim. Can't trust us to think for ourselves.
Please! Free us from freedom! Direct us what to think, o great 4th estate. Where is a truth czar when you need one. I'm so confused!/s
I don’t trust any of the shyster lawyers who said they had “proof”
Discovery is a beautiful thing!
Bring it.
This just may be the match to ensure fair and free elections going forward...
Freedom of speech is being squeezed and the squoze is almost complete.
Given there are around 1500 affidavits from people either witnessing irregularities or outright fraud, isn’t it possible to add a disclaimer to that effect when posting articles which use such gaslighting terms as “baseless claims of election fraud.”
I’m not playing Posting Police here, but that terminology just gets on my nerves like you wouldn’t believe!
Carry on, and may your day be merry.
OK, you already included a disclaimer. My apologies. I will now get more coffee. :-)
What we need are laws requiring voting machine to have 10% open source software. Better yet, laws requiring paper ballots. Machine counting is fine, but the ultimate authority must be human readable.
Then comes discovery. 😆
It is not a false claim. There is enough evidence that makes any intelligent person question.
I suspect they’ve found a judge that’ll block discovery.🤔
These lawsuits are farcical. The statements made were based on affidavits. If this stands, no lawyer could publicly present their client’s side of a case without being sued into oblivion.