“Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters. This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated,” the Obama appointee wrote.
Everything you need to know right there.
Relatively cordial thus far....
No problem.
In Sidney we trust.
None of these early losses mean anything - the game should and will be played out in the Supreme Court......
“no rules regarding the “curing” of ballots”
Sounds like a teenager’s technical excuse. If they wanted people to fix their ballots, it would have been in the legislation. Was there anything in the legislation that stated that a voter could only vote once? If not, then how many times you vote won’t matter.
Pennsylvania Ping!
Please ping me with articles of interest.
FReepmail me to be added to the list.
Their risk is if the Supremes select not to hear the case.