Joe Biden PARTNERED With Chinese COMMUNISTS For $30M [ Rudy Giuliani ]

Rudy Giuliani continues his investigation of the Joseph Biden Crime Family's illegal activities. In this episode, Rudy presents the evidence that, as rudy says, should put Joe in jail.

behind paywall:

28 Oct: WSJ Editorial: The Bidens and Tony Bobulinski
Joe owes the public a response about the family’s business
Joe Biden is asking voters to elect him on the strength of his character, honesty and judgment. Which is why Mr. Biden owes a response to new allegations about his son Hunter’s business deals.

Tony Bobulinski on Tuesday sat with Fox News’ Tucker Carlson to provide details of a 2016-17 business venture involving Hunter, Jim Biden (Joe’s brother), and CEFC China Energy, a conglomerate tied to the Chinese government. Mr. Bobulinski, a Navy veteran and financier, was recruited by Hunter and associates to serve as CEO, and the interview shed more light on...
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-bidens-and-tony-bobulinski-11603927190

28 Oct: NY Post Editorial: Tony Bobulinski’s evidence means media should push Biden to answer big questions
Journalists had a rare chance to ask Joe Biden a few questions Wednesday and — of course — failed to ask him anything about his knowledge of his son’s business dealings.
Even though former ally Tony Bobulinski gave sitdown interviews with Fox News and The Post’s Michael Goodwin outlining in detail his evidence disproving Joe’s repeated claims of lifelong ignorance of son Hunter’s profitable affairs.

And even though Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey was testifying to the Senate about the company’s censoring of stories about the Bidens. Two big developments that the press felt wasn’t worthy of mention.

What questions should media be asking Joe Biden, nonstop?...
https://nypost.com/2020/10/28/tony-bobulinskis-evidence-means-media-should-push-biden-to-answer-big-questions/

VIDEOS: 28 Oct: Fox News: ‘Lapdog press’ blacks out explosive Tony Bobulinski claims as CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WaPo skip story
‘Mainstream liberal media has shown itself unworthy of public trust,’ media critic William A. Jacobson says
By Brian Flood; Fox News’ Adam Shaw and Brooke Singman contributed to this report
Critics are baffled that the mainstream media has largely ignored Tucker Carlson’s interview with Tony Bobulinski...
While the mainstream media has scrutinized President Trump and his family members at every turn, there has been a near blackout of coverage of Bobulinski’s shocking claims...

Bobulinski’s comments to Carlson were completely ignored by CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times and Washington Post as of 8 a.m. EST on Wednesday, exactly 12 hours after the start of the damning interview.
“It is pretty much a 100 percent blackout of the Bobulinski story in the traditional media. Of course, there are lots of stories that need to be covered in the busy 2020 news agenda, but the total omission of Bobulinski’s accusations is curious, to say the least,” DePauw University professor and media critic Jeffrey McCall told Fox News.
“Even if this story is not front and center on the news agenda, it does need to be approached somewhere along the way. Odds are that most mainstream media outlets are devoting very few reporting resources, if any, to the Bobulinski story,” McCall added. “It would seem those outlets could at least be investigating the accusations to try to prove them invalid.”...

Political satirist Tim Young told Fox News said it’s astounding the media has ignored the story.
“When you realize that major media organizations such as CNN, MSNBC, Washington Post and the NY Times ran completely unsubstantiated stories like the pee tape from the dossier, Julie Swetnick and Michael Avenatti’s claims against now Justice Kavanaugh, and numerous anonymous senior administration officials statements that ‘would definitely prove the Trump campaign colluded with Russia’ yet haven’t touched direct testimony with direct evidence and easily provable points from Tony Bobulinski after his Tucker Carlson interview, it goes beyond hypocrisy,” he said, “it’s election interference to try to install a potentially seriously corrupt candidate in Joe Biden.”

Cornell Law School professor and media critic William A. Jacobson told Fox News that it’s clear the liberal media “thinks this could hurt their preferred candidate” so the story is simply being avoided.
“The easiest way to determine whether ignoring or minimizing the Bobulinski interview and documents reflects media bias is to imagine if something similar happened to Donald Trump. If Bobulinski were blowing the whistle on Trump influence peddling, all the networks and newspapers would be carrying the story nonstop through election day,” Jacobson said...
Jacobson feels that despite the media’s attempt to mute the story, it’ll eventually be covered in some capacity.
“They cannot keep a total lid on the story considering it is being covered on the top-rated cable news show and is being picked up by conservative media and social media,” Jacobson said. “Regardless of the election outcome, the mainstream liberal media has shown itself unworthy of public trust.”...

Others took to Twitter with thoughts on the media blackout of news that could hurt the Democratic nominee...
Richard Grenell responded, “Reporters think because they don’t cover this story that people don’t see it. But they certainly do. They also see the bias in ignoring it to help Joe Biden.”...
https://www.foxnews.com/media/lapdog-press-blacks-out-explosive-tony-bobulinski-claims

27 Oct: Real Clear Investigations: Senate Panel Investigating Hunter Biden’s Failure to Register as Foreign Agent
by Paul Sperry
A search of Justice Department databases reveals that Hunter Biden failed to register as a foreign agent while promoting the interests of foreign business partners in Washington, including brokering meetings with his father and other government officials, and RealClear Investigations has learned that at least one Senate committee is investigating whether Joe Biden’s son violated federal laws requiring disclosure of such foreign contacts.

The Obama administration did not prosecute Hunter Biden for potential violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act, despite its much more aggressive pursuit of FARA cases relative to other administrations — including its opening of criminal investigations on no fewer than six Trump campaign advisers in 2016...

Some former investigators and prosecutors say the uneven enforcement of the federal statute smacks of politics. “It’s a double standard, 100%,” said former assistant FBI director Chris Swecker, who led public corruption cases out of Washington.
Added Swecker, who also served as a federal prosecutor: “It’s strange how in this election there is no curiosity whatsoever about foreign influence on a potential president of the United States, especially from this country’s greatest threat — China.”...READ ON
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/10/27/senate_probes_hunter_bidens_failure_to_register_as_foreign_agent_125798.html

I know Rudy is not everyone’s cup of tea and frankly some of these podcasts are difficult to listen to and/or to follow.

However, he has been proven correct repeatedly about the Biden’s and Ukraine and he started releasing stuff almost a year ago.

The latest “spin” today from the leftwing media and even people like Ben Shapiro, is that nothing Biden did was “criminal” and it is just the usual swampiness (although in fairness to Shapiro he still calls it corruption).

This is simply NOT TRUE. If Biden got a dime or took an official act to financially benefit his son (Burisma) that is a crime. We also have corrupt foreign practices act, money laundering, and FARA by all of them to include...... Joe Biden.

Why are so many people suggesting this was not criminal? There is ample evidence of criminality.... you cannot cover this up with “plausible deniability.”

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.