Realistic ways to a tie, or just mathematically possible?
“...or just mathematically possible?”
Yeah - they would have California going for Trump and South Dakota for Clinton.
Something like 172 different ways it “could” be a tie. So to be read as “172 ways that Hillary could be president!”
The most realistic path to a tie would be for Trump to lose PA and MI, which were his narrowest wins in 2016, and the Omaha district, which he is supposedly doing very poorly in — it being an entirely suburban district chock full of suburban Karens.
Then, with everything else being identical to 2016, we would have a tie.