Posted on 06/23/2020 8:51:48 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
The Civil War ended in 1865. From the end of Reconstruction in 1877 until around 1960, there was an unofficial truce between the North and South. Each side saluted the other’s courage. Americans agreed that the North had fought to preserve the Union and because Old Glory had been fired upon, and the South had fought for independence and liberty. Even prominent Northern professor Dr. James McPherson of Princeton University—no great friend of the South—agreed on the latter point. For eighty decades the two great heroes of the war were Abraham Lincoln and Robert E. Lee. And though they may not have been willing to admit the full extent of its cruelty, Southerners did concede that slavery was wrong.
All of this changed with the rise of a brilliant politician named Lyndon B. Johnson. He was not a good man, but he was a brilliant politician: in 1960, when he was running simultaneously for Vice President of the United States and for Senator from Texas, he advocated for integration in the national race, but segregation when he campaigned in Texas. Johnson was responsible for the invention of identity politics. He believed that he could appeal to African American voters and attract them into the Democratic Party en masse by advocating for rights. He was right. In 1956, 75 percent of African Americans voted for Eisenhower, the Republican candidate for President. But in 1964 more than 90 percent of black Americans voted Democrat—even as Johnson was still referring to them by the N-word when the cameras were not rolling.
And so things continued until Donald Trump pointed out that the Democrats’ policies had failed African Americans and asked them, “What have you got to lose?” Many black people answered: “Not much.”
It appears that President Trump’s strategy is working. Recent polls show black support for Trump at 36, 38, and 40 percent. If these numbers hold up in the election in November, it will fundamentally change American politics. No wonder there is panic among certain leftist groups. Could this be the real cause behind the riots?
George Floyd’s horrific death was wrong, but it is the pretext for, rather than the cause of, the current mob violence.
The leftists are attempting to apply the policy of divide and conquer. They are acting out of desperation. They realize that they are finished if they lose the African American vote, and they are smart enough to know that their grip on that vote is weakening. Their attack on Confederate monuments and Southern heritage is a last-ditch effort to hold on to the votes of blacks by stoking entirely understandable fears and resentments arising from the historical injustices of slavery and Jim Crow. But it is not just about Confederate monuments. Leftist thugs and their myrmidons have destroyed an impressive number of historical monuments that have nothing to do with the Confederacy: statues of Columbus across the country have been vandalized and defaced; a monument commemorating World War II in Albany, Georgia; the Los Angeles Vietnam War memorial; a Michigan monument to Troy Nealey, a lance corporal killed in the Iraq War; a World War I memorial in Adams County, Massachusetts; across the country, statues of Columbus have been vandalized and defaced; someone painted “Tear It Down” on a St. Joan of Arc statue in New Orleans.
The simple true is that the Left wants no heroes except its own. So they have converted Robert E. Lee, who opposed both slavery and secession, into the symbol for both. Franklin D. Roosevelt called Lee the most Christ-like American who ever lived. Winston Churchill said he was the most noble man to ever speak the English language. Yet suddenly he is evil incarnate.
Some people aver that you cannot change history. I suppose that depends on how you define history. When I was a freshman in college (back when Moses was a sophomore) one of my professors defined history as “the study of the past with interpretation.” By that definition, if you change the interpretation you change the history—not the actual past, but the history. And that is exactly what is going on today.
Churchill is credited with saying that a lie can go halfway around the world before the truth gets its trousers on in the morning. When the truth about the moment that we are living through finally comes out, I predict that it will be vastly different than the current leftist media narrative. I just hope that when it does, we still have something of our American heritage—and some of our cities—left.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Dr. Samuel W. Mitcham, Jr. is a retired professor and the author of forty books, including "It Wasn’t About Slavery: Exposing the Great Lie of the Civil War and Bust Hell Wide Open: The Life of Nathan Bedford Forrest." A former army helicopter pilot and company commander, he lives in Louisiana.
I agree. I cannot see this a getting more of the Black vote. I think it only helps President Trump.
I would be surprised if it is true that Eisenhower received 75% of the black vote in 1956. Of course in 1956 it was hard for blacks to vote in a number of states.”
Eisenhower was a quarter black. More black than Obozo who is mostly Arab. Eisenhower was our own natural born citizen black and not a foreign invader.
Its no movement, maybe a bowl movement....Its led by criminals and followed by criminals...
I doubt they were losing the black vote to begin with.
Half their voting places have been burned down.
November 3rd will be the left’s Hiroshima
I never heard that Eisenhower had any black ancestry before. His mother’s maiden name was Stover and she was born in Virginia. His appearance was not like that of someone with 25% African ancestry.
On the contrary.
RE: On the contrary.
Can you elaborate?
No look at the numbers. Rasmussen last week Trump approval from African Americans has never been higher- 40% approve and 26% approve very highly.
Think about it!
Eisenhower’s maternal grandmother was Elizabeth Ida Juda Link. She lost her parents when she was six and was raised by a white family. If you look closely at President Eisenhower you will see the somewhat broader features of a black person. There were issues raised about race during his campaign.
The black community was prospering during the 50s with more black small businesses. When LBJ got in he had to stop this success in the black community, thus the Great Society that destroyed the black families by driving out the fathers.
Maybe the minorities ought to reconsider voting for dems. Dems were the party of lynchings and the KKK and white supremecy. The dems voted against allowing blacks to vote and making them citizens. There’s more. Watch this short video. There is also one on Repubs. Dems won’t like that one either.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_a7dQXilCo
"Gather round, kids. while I tell you a tale from 1220 A.D."
Losing the black vote? Yeah, all the way down to 94%.
Sorry. Not sorry. Many of these folks are out everyday talking to AA. They are more successful then ever. Will it take awhile ?
yep. 38 percent of this country will vote by party NO MATTER HOW AWFUL they are. But we have to keep trying. And they are. I commend them.
Right burning,looting, stealing, and generally criminal thugs burning Cities..Yea that should sell well with the Voters..
This is the message we need to keep putting out there. That many of these statues are of men who were Democratic racists.
The thugs in charge timed this very badly. The “fun” of looting will be long gone, and the pain of no longer having a business district will still be fresh. I imagine this will give Trump a small bump with urban voters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.