Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai

No, I get it. I said the reason the Civil War erupted. It wasn’t Slavery, it was the Succession movement. Slavery was only part of the equation.

Remember, Lincoln wanted the Blacks sent back to Africa after the War.

The North benefitted financially from the Agriculture Economy of the South, which means they benefitted from the Slave Labor used in the South.

The issue of Slavery was not the reason the Civil War started. It evolved as the reason in our History Books, but it was not the spark.


25 posted on 06/23/2020 8:03:55 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (THEY LIVE, and we're the only ones wearing the Sunglasses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Kickass Conservative

What was the secession movement about?


27 posted on 06/23/2020 8:08:39 AM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Kickass Conservative
The North benefitted financially from the Agriculture Economy of the South, which means they benefitted from the Slave Labor used in the South.

More than most people understand. Imports have to be paid for by exports, and the South produced 73% of the total export value for the United States.

All the taxes came from tariffs on imports, which essentially meant they were paid for by exports produced mainly from the South.

The North was hardly getting taxed at all. With 5 times the South's population, it was paying a little over 1/4th of the tax burden the South was paying.

29 posted on 06/23/2020 8:26:40 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson