WTF has he been doing while presiding over the trial for the past 3 years?
Well he saw enough facts to call him a traitor. Kind of prejudicial mind showing there, eh Judge?? I hope our paths never cross in the court room because I know I would not get a fair hearing.
Actually, no. His recital of the facts were completely wrong. He was citing Rachel Maddow’s talking points from the day before, talking points that also completely mischaracterized Flynn’s case. Maddow’s claimed that Flynn had been “representing Turkey while he was National Security Advisor” and was a Traitor. She waxed apoplectic about Flynn talking about Obama’s sanctions on Russia for its meddling in the 2016 presidential election. . . But Obama did not impose sanctions for the 2016 presidential election, he expelled specifics Russian diplomats. That’s all. The US Congress introduced Sanctions on Russian three weeks AFTER Flynn’s conversation with Kislyak, sanctions that Obama never mentioned. Flynn just suggested that the Russians not proceed with a tit-for-tat retaliation on the diplomat expulsions in advance of a new administration being inaugurated.
Judge Sullivan showed he knew NOTHING about the case when he called Flynn a traitor, but that he did watch Rachel Maddow.