Posted on 05/12/2020 4:49:37 AM PDT by yardboyd
It was absolutely high treason, fits the classic definition.
Unfortunately, the Founders chose to define “treason” in the Constitution specifically to prevent the entry of high treason into US law, so this is not an option to go after Obama and Biden.
Seditious conspiracy is going to have to do for now.
This is the reason the FBI needs to be eliminated. Every last employee, no matter how innocent, should not be rehired by government
btt
Obama, Biden guilty of treason against the USA Nation Republic. They and many other guilty Democrat Scum & vermin need to be cuffed, arrested and charged with treason.
If found guilty by their fellow American Citizens in a jury trail...they, and many other Democrats should be promptly jailed or executed as the law calls for!!!
As President Trump has said,They are gonna pay!
The perpetrators, including Obama, now find themselves in extreme civil jeopardy, so Obama is now spreading disinformation. Here is what Obama so wrongly and tortiously organized for Flynn :
1) A crime with no predicate.
2) falsification of FBI forms 302
3) FBI investigator notes which indicate political motivation
4) Meetings at the highest level in which Rice revealed in her memos what strategy was to be followed in framing Flynn, Obama,Biden,YAtes, Comey, Rice, Clapper and Brennan were present at a series of such meetings beginning January 5th.
Obama now taking to the media posturing himself to limit his exposure to liability, ( He will pay big time)
Add this up and it is but one result:
A civil law suit for Malicious Prosecution#
Because it involved organizational crime and racketeering, the extraordinary remedies available from a RICO civil offense are obvious.
And the various perpetrators of this crime , include a law firm which acted in conflict of interest ( Flynns original legal team that advised him to plead guilty), FBI Agent Strzok, Comey, McCabe,Yates, Rice, Brennan, Clapper and Obama himself. All of the perpetrators exceeded their governmental authorities of office so that the legal jeopardy is personal for these perpetrators, the government nor the taxpayers are liable for these millions of dollars in damages. All of the perpetrators are personally liable in the millions of dollars. (Not to mention the federal crimes of sedition, treason and espionage, and the likely disbarment of several attorneys involved in Flynns original defense team.)
I expect that letters pleading settlement have already been received by Flynns legal counsel. For the benefit of America, I hope General Flynn proceeds to a public civil trial in a malicious prosecution suit for damages.Let them all lose their homes and livelihoods in return, for that is indeed what Justice demands.
**********************************************
#
Malicious prosecution is an intentional tort designed to provide redress for losses flowing from an unjustified prosecution....
Under the first element of the test for malicious prosecution, the plaintiff must prove that the prosecution at issue was initiated by the defendant. This element identifies the proper target of the suit, as it is only those who were actively instrumental in setting the law in motion that may be held accountable for any damage that results....
The second element of the tort demands evidence that the prosecution terminated in the plaintiffs favour. This requirement precludes a collateral attack on a conviction properly rendered by a criminal court, and thus avoids conflict between civil and criminal justice. The favourable termination requirement may be satisfied no matter the route by which the proceedings conclude in the plaintiffs favour, whether it be an acquittal, a discharge at a preliminary hearing, a withdrawal, or a stay. However, where the termination does not result from an adjudication on the merits, for example, in the case of a settlement or plea bargain, a live issue may arise whether the termination of the proceedings was in favour of the plaintiff....
The third element which must be proven by a plaintiff absence of reasonable and probable cause to commence or continue the prosecution further delineates the scope of potential plaintiffs. As a matter of policy, if reasonable and probable cause existed at the time the prosecutor commenced or continued the criminal proceeding in question, the proceeding must be taken to have been properly instituted, regardless of the fact that it ultimately terminated in favour of the accused....
Finally, the initiation of criminal proceedings in the absence of reasonable and probable grounds does not itself suffice to ground a plaintiffs case for malicious prosecution, regardless of whether the defendant is a private or public actor. Malicious prosecution, as the label implies, is an intentional tort that requires proof that the defendants conduct in setting the criminal process in motion was fueled by malice. The malice requirement is the key to striking the balance that the tort was designed to maintain: between societys interest in the effective administration of criminal justice and the need to compensate individuals who have been wrongly prosecuted for a primary purpose other than that of carrying the law into effect.
***********************************************
http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/M/MaliciousProsecution.aspx
************************************************
Democrats have been, for decades, loading up the government agencies, especially the FBI, DOJ, CIA, DOE, and all intelligence agencies, with liberals who would advocate for and carry out the marching orders from the democratic party.
Thus, by the time Trump took office, it’s safe to say that most of the government agencies that went after Trump and republicans, were loaded up staffs that one could easily estimate to be 80% or more democrat stooges.
I’ve been saying it since the beginning of Trump’s presidency, which is when the democrats started the multiple ways of going after Trump. The signs were there even before Trump started running for the presidency, but, oh no!, the government was there to serve the people and was not there to do anything sinister. Lessons learned, and the purging of the government of those who were trying to undo a presidency and the actual American form of government, needs to happen, and Trump (and hopefully, Pence) need to do that purging in the next 8 years and more. Anything less puts the U.S. and its people in jeopardy.
ehhhh Sessions may be the reason
Any who doesn't support the constitution and live up to their oaths must be removed!
How disgraceful that Representative Massie (R-KY) is the ONLY member of the House that votes 100 % of the time to uphold the Constitution.
Trust Sessions
Great photo of three traitorous running dogs for the damned communists!
The fact that Flynn plead guilty may put a crimp in those plans. He said under oath he broke the law.
I knew this day was coming, and expected to feel vindicated and happy. However, I just feel sad and depressed that this could happen in America. The extent of the traitorous and criminal actions of the “Deep State” (to nice a description) is almost too much to fathom.
Deep State Trials coming. We live in interesting times.
Lois Lerner from the IRS is still laughing at you.
(Living comfortable on her $102,600 per year pension paid for by you.)
Nixon’s guys sent a couple of guys to listen to his opponents. This became forever known as “Watergate”. About 45 years later Obama sent the FBI,DOJ,CIA,NSA and a multitude of other agencies to spy on this opponents. Somebody please flush when you leave the room.
Rush predicts nothing will happen to the great 0 emperor...PDJT, however, doesn’t play by traditional rules.
Not one person came forward, not one!
The fact that Flynn plead guilty may put a crimp in those plans. He said under oath he broke the law. >>>>>>>
The plea was made under duress, and also through the conflicyt of interest advice from his first team of potentially disbarred attorneys.
It might be a pleaded defense to malicious prosecution, but an unsuccessful one IMHO, because the plea, although on the record under oath ,was not only hasty, but fraudulently contrived.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.