Obama was what the founders tried to prevent with the natural born citizen requirement.
A foreigner in the Oval Office.
An enemy agent as Commander in Chief.
Barry is getting a little nervous.
“Curious statement” means “flagrant lie”.
I’d like to see the same precedent statement from the Clintons. We all know with 100% certainty that Bill Clinton committed perjury, lying under oath, and the proof is as convincing as DNA on a blue dress. There is a lot of precedent for getting away with perjury, either because the accused is a democrat and thus above the law or because the prosecutor is a democrat and thus a corrupt abuser of power.
Very surprised to learn John Turley is a “liberal” law professor!!
I don’t find it curious at all. It fits right in with other left-wing commentators distortions of the truth.
Two words for obama
James Cartwright
The general was convicted of lying to the FBI about his role in leaking classified information that HELPED IRAN
Pardoned by obama on his last day in office
His hyprocrisy has NO bounds
Constitutional Law Professor goes head to head with Constitutional Law Substitute Teacher.
you poor bastard
There is a difference. Turley is an actual lawyer. Obama just plays a constitutional scholar on TV having gotten his law degree from the usual cracker jack box - Harvard.
What is at risk is their rules for our laws.
Flynn needs to be the crack in the dam.
.
How much of this is part of a power struggle between the clintoons and obungo. Turley’s been Backing the clintoons for ever.
The media will be all over this, right?
“There is a specific rule allowing for this motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a). There are specific Supreme Court cases like Rinaldi v. United States addressing the standard for such dismissals. The Justice Department has dismissed cases in the past including the Stevens case. That was requested by President Obama's own Attorney General Eric Holder for the same reason: misconduct by prosecutors. It was done before the same judge, Judge Sullivan.”
“How is that for precedent?” Turley asked.
And the frosting on the cake: Eric Holder's name enters the fray. Lol.
Most of the lawyerly type talkers are furiously searching for the "painfully obvious" difference in that case at this very moment.
That’s nice Barry, let’s talk about Holder, Lynch, Hillary and YOU!
That’s nice Barry, let’s talk about Holder, Lynch, Hillary and YOU!
Yes, apparently “rule of law” = “liberals can persecute people any time they want because they feel like it”.
He KNOWS who was calling out all the "ORDERS from HEADQUARTERS"... it WAS HIMSELF that called the shots.
He now KNOWS he may be caught in his own web unless Biden, or some other Dimm, can retake the presidency.
I'd say he's going to be FULLY EXPOSED.
Whether he's ever indicted and prosecuted is another matter altogether... that's all about POLITICS, NOT JUSTICE.
Be afraid, Obama, be very afraid. The Truth is stalking you!
Obama is correct about the threat to HIS rule of law. One that is derived from Stalin’s Show Trials from the Great Purge.