Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Replicating Covid variants in culture without BSL4 protections.
Osong Public Health Res Perspect ^ | 4/21/2020 | nevergiveup

Posted on 04/21/2020 1:31:04 PM PDT by neverevergiveup

Virus isolation

The virus was isolated from nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal samples from putative COVID-19 patients. Oropharyngeal samples were diluted with viral transfer medium containing nasopharyngeal swabs and antibiotics (Nystadin, penicillin-streptomycin 1:1 dilution) at 1:4 ratio and incubated for 1 hour at 4°C, before being inoculated onto Vero cells. Inoculated Vero cells were cultured at 37°C, 5% CO2 in 1× Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum and penicillin-streptomycin.

Virus replication and isolation were confirmed through cytopathic effects, gene detection, and electron microscopy. Viral culture of SARS-CoV-2 was conducted in a biosafety Level-3 facility according to laboratory biosafety guidelines of Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

(Excerpt) Read more at ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: covid; regulation; research
The link is a study, done in South Korea, in which coronavirus was isolated from patients suspected of having Covid, and was cultured and replicated in a BSL-3 facility - to facilitate studies of the viral genome.

My point in posting this is that this isn't a high-containment BSL-4 laboratory. This is a BSL-3 laboratory, that may or may not be diligent with BSL-3 criteria. I am essentially certain that this kind of research is common.

This is vanity, but I truly believe that science is 'broken', and is driven by ambition more than intellectual curiosity or ethical scienctific principles. I'm not singling out this South Korean group, who likely are very diligent, and produced a relatively good study. It's more about the breadth of the scientific 'community' these days. It's become 'Hollywood' for those (like me) who liked to play with chemistry sets as a kid. The problem is that the technology has advanced to the point that great harm can be done by individual labs.

I believe this is an issue that needs to be addressed by non-scientists and the scientific community. We may be suffering the results of this type of unethical science with the current Covid outbreak. Thoughts?

1 posted on 04/21/2020 1:31:04 PM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverevergiveup

Someone could do that in their basement.

I am sure there are places in the world where that HAS happened.

I imagine that if I tried that in my basement I would arrested and thrown in jail.


2 posted on 04/21/2020 1:47:13 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

If you knew someone who had this disease you could get them to blow their nose a dozen or so times, maybe cough up phlegm too, and freeze it. And the disease would live long enough to be thawed out someplace else?


3 posted on 04/21/2020 2:17:05 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverevergiveup

It’s not like BSL-3 is willy nilly. It’s pretty solid containment. Really BSL-4 is only necessary for hardcore killers like Ebola.

Ambition and intellectual curiosity aren’t mutually exclusive. Science has long been ruled by people who want to find something first. Because that’s where the fun lies. And most scientists really fail on practical application, so forget ethics. Scientific ethics means no bombs. We make bombs.

Great harm has been able to be done in individual labs for a long time. And you can’t put the genie back in the bottle.

Covid is natural. Don’t believe the conspiracy weenies.


4 posted on 04/21/2020 2:22:48 PM PDT by discostu (I know that's a bummer baby, but it's got precious little to do with me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverevergiveup

Another genie that’s out of the bottle, on the streets and available for just about any suburban bio-hacker’s mom’s basement.

Bruce Sterling once wrote a bit (not the entire story, just a sort of “for example”) about some hackers engineering a virus what would activate melanocytes in white people making them, effectively, black.

A sort of bioengineered social justice worrier terrorist attack.

Now if someone could only do that for sleeping hair follicles the world would beat a pathway to his mom’s basement.


5 posted on 04/21/2020 3:09:02 PM PDT by normbal (normbal. somewhere in socialist occupied America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I would imagine if you put it in the proper solution and “fed it” properly you could easily transport it pretty much anywhere.


6 posted on 04/21/2020 3:31:11 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: discostu

“It’s not like BSL-3 is willy nilly. It’s pretty solid containment. Really BSL-4 is only necessary for hardcore killers like Ebola.”

Years ago I worked at the Cummings Life Science Center, part of the University of Chicago on 58th street.
At the time it was a CDC Lv 3 Lab and there was only one Lv4 lab (Atlantia) at that time. IIRC.
The main difference is the Lv 4 exhaust air passed through a burner and heated before discharge into the atmosphere.

Photo of Cummings:
http://storage.lib.uchicago.edu/ucpa/series2/derivatives_series2/apf2-02046r.jpg

Back then residential buildings across the street. Now surrounded by U of C.

The odd-looking chimneys are building exhaust air, discharged above the roof.

Some of the floors had doors like on a large safe or from a submarine.

An architectural delight if you like brutalist towers.


7 posted on 04/21/2020 3:36:08 PM PDT by DUMBGRUNT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: normbal

“Now if someone could only do that for sleeping hair follicles the world would beat a pathway to his mom’s basement.”

LOL. It’s being worked on. I could see it going wrong and turning a bunch of guys into Sasquatch.


8 posted on 04/21/2020 3:52:27 PM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: discostu
“Covid is natural. Don’t believe the conspiracy weenies.”

Be happy to debate you on that one from a molecular perspective. What are the odds that a novel highly pathogenic coronavirus just happens to have its index case in a city in China, at which the ONLY BSL-4 virology institute in China is based, and at which the director of this institute has spent a good portion of her ‘career’ working on coronavirus (specifically ‘gain of function’ mutations in coronavirus), and that these facts are unrelated? Really? I've engineered viruses. If you are going to be dismissive about the possibility that this virus is related to the Wuhan institute, please elucidate why.

Oh, and BSL-3 might not be ‘willy nilly’, but it isn't sufficient to be culturing a virus that is responsible for a current pandemic that is shutting down the economies of the world.

9 posted on 04/21/2020 4:04:57 PM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverevergiveup

“We may be suffering the results of this type of unethical science with the current Covid outbreak. Thoughts? “
____________________________________________________________________________

Why was “Gain of Function” authorized for this virus after it was prohibited and strongly advised against?


10 posted on 04/21/2020 7:15:19 PM PDT by Captain7seas (UN EXIT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverevergiveup

There is nothing to debate. It is natural. Period. Anybody thinking otherwise is being silly. The odds of a novel pathogen indexing out of China, given it’s largely 3rd world conditions, high pollution, high population, and high connectivity to the rest of the world are about 100%. This is China’s 3rd big scary this century. And there will be another. And another. And another. China is the perfect petrie dish. With high levels of contact between live animals, and live animals and humans, and humans and humans, and retarded immune system in everything from the smog, and the world’s manufacturing focused there.

BSL-4 is for things that if you get them you die. CV19 is not on that list.


11 posted on 04/22/2020 7:12:30 AM PDT by discostu (I know that's a bummer baby, but it's got precious little to do with me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: discostu
There is plenty to debate, but if you want to be dogmatic, based upon no solid facts, you are entitled. I have a ton of experience with viruses, including having run a facility at one point. What I wrote in the post you out of hand dismissed as ‘silly’ is conjectural - but it is conjecture based upon what this group has already done with regards gain of function mutations. Luc Montagnier (French virologist & Nobel laureate who jointly discovered HIV) has claimed that Coronavirus originated in a lab. Is he ‘silly’?

As far as BSL3 vs BSL4 for Covid-19 goes, BSL-4 is also for those infectious agents that are emerging/new, can cause death, and about which not a lot is known. Covid-19 fits that criteria.

12 posted on 04/22/2020 8:00:12 AM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverevergiveup

No there isn’t. There’s conspiracy whack jobs and there’s truth. That’s not debate. Yes Luc Montagnier, and all the other guys who are waving around certificates without ACTUALLY EXAMINING THE VIRUS are silly.

Once must also keep in mind on facilities that you get what you’ve got. When ebola breakouts happen they setup their tents and equipment and get to work. It’s not possible in those mobile conditions to get past BSL2, and they’re working with a BSL4 pathogen. But it’s what they do, because they have to. If all you’ve got is a BSL3 facility then that’s all you have. You work with it.


13 posted on 04/22/2020 8:15:42 AM PDT by discostu (I know that's a bummer baby, but it's got precious little to do with me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: discostu
The sequence for the virus (and variants of it) are available and many of us HAVE examined them. It's not conspiracy to speculate that a virology institute that exists in the city in which Covid-19 originated, and that just happened to be working on gain of function coronavirus mutants could be the source for Covid-19. Mistakes happen (e.g. smallpox from a lab in the UK causing the death of photographer Janet Parker in 1978).

Before she was silenced, Shi Zhengli, who directs the Wuhan lab, stated that she had been worried that the virus had originated in the lab. She then said that after they ‘checked the sequences’ she found that it wasn't from the lab. Given the lack of straightforward answers from China to date, who knows whether her comments about the sequences were truthful or managed. More to the point, is that even she admitted to the possibility that a pathogen could escape from that facility.

Dogma and truth are rarely compatible.

14 posted on 04/22/2020 8:33:10 AM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: neverevergiveup

It most definitely is a conspiracy theory to speculate without proof. And that’s what they’re doing. Oh look more “speculation”. The favorite ting of conspiracy junkies. you’re the one with the dogma. Taking all the random BS and “speculation” as the truth that fits what YOU WANT TO BELIEVE. Meanwhile, out here in reality. Bugs come out of China on a fairly regular basis, and this one is showing no signs of being any different. A natural mutation of a shared bug between humans and other mammals that came out kind of nasty.


15 posted on 04/22/2020 8:36:21 AM PDT by discostu (I know that's a bummer baby, but it's got precious little to do with me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Whatever you want to believe is your decision. Assuming that this virus spontaneously mutated in bats and jumped to humans is also speculative. The sequencing that has been done to date does not provide ‘proof’ of either ‘natural’ mutation or of genetic manipulation - although there are sequences in Covid-19 that raise questions/suspicions of genetic engineering.

It’s not ‘conspiracy’ that Dr. Shi Zhengli was doing gain of function research on coronavirus. That’s documented.


16 posted on 04/22/2020 9:05:12 AM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: neverevergiveup

But Dr Shi’s speculation, more importantly YOU acting like that’s absolute proof, IS conspiracy. That’s the thing with the conspiracy crowd. You’re completely fed by confirmational bias. Every “maybe” that agrees with you becomes total proof. Meanwhile we know how this works. We know how it worked with SARS, we know how it worked with bird flu, we know how it works with ebola, we know how it worked with swine flu. Anything saying this isn’t like every single other damned one of these bugs is an extraordinary claim and requires extraordinary proof. And some guy we don’t even know if he’s gotten sample to work with saying “I think maybe” ain’t extraordinary proof.


17 posted on 04/22/2020 9:12:09 AM PDT by discostu (I know that's a bummer baby, but it's got precious little to do with me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Have you ever bioengineered a virus? Are you a virologist? A molecular biologist? An M.D.? A genetic evolutionary biologist? You are making lots of very dogmatic and definitive statements about what motivates me, what I think, etc. etc., with absolutely no knowledge about who I am, what I am, what my experience is, and how I conduct myself in the world. That, my dear FRiend, is bias, and conjecture.

Stay safe and well.

18 posted on 04/22/2020 9:53:11 AM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: neverevergiveup

Oh look appeal to authority. Give extraordinary proof for your extraordinary claim.


19 posted on 04/22/2020 9:56:51 AM PDT by discostu (I know that's a bummer baby, but it's got precious little to do with me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson