Posted on 04/15/2020 4:04:11 AM PDT by Kaslin
America's colleges are rife with corruption. The financial squeeze resulting from COVID-19 offers opportunities for a bit of remediation. Let's first examine what might be the root of academic corruption, suggested by the title of a recent study, "Academic Grievance Studies and the Corruption of Scholarship." The study was done by Areo, an opinion and analysis digital magazine. By the way, Areo is short for Areopagitica, a speech delivered by John Milton in defense of free speech.
Authors Helen Pluckrose, James A. Lindsay and Peter Boghossian say that something has gone drastically wrong in academia, especially within certain fields within the humanities. They call these fields "grievance studies," where scholarship is not so much based upon finding truth but upon attending to social grievances. Grievance scholars bully students, administrators and other departments into adhering to their worldview. The worldview they promote is neither scientific nor rigorous. Grievance studies consist of disciplines such as sociology, anthropology, gender studies, queer, sexuality and critical race studies.
In 2017 and 2018, authors Pluckrose, Lindsay and Boghossian started submitting bogus academic papers to academic journals in cultural, queer, race, gender, fat and sexuality studies to determine if they would pass peer review and be accepted for publication. Acceptance of dubious research that journal editors found sympathetic to their intersectional or postmodern leftist vision of the world proves the problem of low academic standards.
Several of the fake research papers were accepted for publication. The Fat Studies journal published a hoax paper that argued the term bodybuilding was exclusionary and should be replaced with "fat bodybuilding, as a fat-inclusive politicized performance." One reviewer said, "I thoroughly enjoyed reading this article and believe it has an important contribution to make to the field and this journal." "Our Struggle Is My Struggle: Solidarity Feminism as an Intersectional Reply to Neoliberal and Choice Feminism," was accepted for publication by Affilia, a feminist journal for social workers. The paper consisted in part of a rewritten passage from Mein Kampf. Two other hoax papers were published, including "Rape Culture and Queer Performativity at Urban Dog Parks." This paper's subject was dog-on-dog rape. But the dog rape paper eventually forced Boghossian, Pluckrose and Lindsay to prematurely out themselves. A Wall Street Journal writer had figured out what they were doing.
Some papers accepted for publication in academic journals advocated training men like dogs and punishing white male college students for historical slavery by asking them to sit in silence in the floor in chains during class and to be expected to learn from the discomfort. Other papers celebrated morbid obesity as a healthy life choice and advocated treating privately conducted masturbation as a form of sexual violence against women. Typically, academic journal editors send submitted papers out to referees for review. In recommending acceptance for publication, many reviewers gave these papers glowing praise.
Political scientist Zach Goldberg ran certain grievance studies concepts through the Lexis/Nexis database, to see how often they appeared in our press over the years. He found huge increases in the usages of "white privilege," "unconscious bias," "critical race theory" and "whiteness." All of this is being taught to college students, many of whom become primary and secondary school teachers who then indoctrinate our young people.
I doubt whether the coronavirus-caused financial crunch will give college and university administrators, who are a crossbreed between a parrot and jellyfish, the guts and backbone to restore academic respectability. Far too often, they get much of their political support from campus grievance people who are members of the faculty and diversity and multicultural administrative offices. The best hope lies with boards of trustees, though many serve as yes men for the university president. I think that a good start would be to find 1950s or 1960s catalogs. Look at the course offerings at a time when college graduates knew how to read, write and compute, and make them today's curricula. Another helpful tool would be to give careful consideration to eliminating all classes/majors/minors containing the word "studies," such as women, Asian, black or queer studies. I'd bet that by restoring the traditional academic mission to colleges, they would put a serious dent into the COVID-19 budget shortfall.
There’s a sucker born every minute! No compassion for idiots capable of getting into college and taking worthless degrees at enormous cost.
Another rat scam. College on line is the future hope they destroy these criminals
Yep! Untold thousands are paying really big bucks to major in degrees of unemployment—degrees that offer no value to a prospective employer.
Best descriptor I have seen!
Unfortunately it has bled past the “studies” curricula and is starting to infect STEM.
I still say take away football (and associated tailgate parties), basketball, and frat parties, and colleges would fold.
I used to edit papers for a scholarly journal. A lot of them were so full of jargon they made no sense at all.
I feel the same way about a thread focused on the Shroud's authenticity now on FR.
The only legitimate purpose of baccalaureate education is to make THE STUDENT a better person. It was never supposed to be a trade school, we have trade schools (including medical, dental, nursing, veterinary, law, etc) for those who aspire to a good living.
I majored in English, which offered (virtually) no value to an employer (since most employers are too stupid to understand the value of that field of study). However, I was a different person at 22 compared to 18, and the personal value of my studies was enormous.
My trade school experience after college is what made my career.
The whole college phenomenon as currently executed is rotten to the core. OF COURSE there should be sheltered places where high school nerds can improve their minds by studying Renaissance poetry or military history.
There should be (as there used to be) direct entry six year medical and dental schools, with strict exam- and personal interview-based entry criteria.
Colleges of Liberal Arts should remain, but with a strict "no loans" policy and a disclosure that most smart people who enroll test worse after four years than they do at entry AND that additional schooling/training will be required after graduation to make the student employable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.