[jimtorr]

Nothing in the article about why the judges reasoning.

[jimtorr]

Reads like a bad google translation.

Nothing in the article about the judges reasoning.

[Starboard]

Nothing in the article about why the judges reasoning.

***************

You don’t understand. It has nothing to do with reason or legality. Its about visceral and partisan emoting. /sarc

[TexasGator]

“Nothing in the article about why the judges reasoning.”

This denied an emergency injunction. The suit is still proceeding.

[GOPJ]

I’m guessing the judge felt if people who live on the beach can use the beach then townspeople will also come and cops will spend all their time checking ID’s... If Huck owns the land up to the water then he should be able to walk in his backyard. If on the other hand his backyard comes up to the beach - but does not include it, then he should follow the rules the rest of us have to follow.